Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Stocks, Bitcoin and Crypto Markets Breaking Bad on Donald Trump Pump - 21st Nov 24
Gold Price To Re-Test $2,700 - 21st Nov 24
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: This Is My Strong Warning To You - 21st Nov 24
Financial Crisis 2025 - This is Going to Shock People! - 21st Nov 24
Dubai Deluge - AI Tech Stocks Earnings Correction Opportunities - 18th Nov 24
Why President Trump Has NO Real Power - Deep State Military Industrial Complex - 8th Nov 24
Social Grant Increases and Serge Belamant Amid South Africa's New Political Landscape - 8th Nov 24
Is Forex Worth It? - 8th Nov 24
Nvidia Numero Uno in Count Down to President Donald Pump Election Victory - 5th Nov 24
Trump or Harris - Who Wins US Presidential Election 2024 Forecast Prediction - 5th Nov 24
Stock Market Brief in Count Down to US Election Result 2024 - 3rd Nov 24
Gold Stocks’ Winter Rally 2024 - 3rd Nov 24
Why Countdown to U.S. Recession is Underway - 3rd Nov 24
Stock Market Trend Forecast to Jan 2025 - 2nd Nov 24
President Donald PUMP Forecast to Win US Presidential Election 2024 - 1st Nov 24
At These Levels, Buying Silver Is Like Getting It At $5 In 2003 - 28th Oct 24
Nvidia Numero Uno Selling Shovels in the AI Gold Rush - 28th Oct 24
The Future of Online Casinos - 28th Oct 24
Panic in the Air As Stock Market Correction Delivers Deep Opps in AI Tech Stocks - 27th Oct 24
Stocks, Bitcoin, Crypto's Counting Down to President Donald Pump! - 27th Oct 24
UK Budget 2024 - What to do Before 30th Oct - Pensions and ISA's - 27th Oct 24
7 Days of Crypto Opportunities Starts NOW - 27th Oct 24
The Power Law in Venture Capital: How Visionary Investors Like Yuri Milner Have Shaped the Future - 27th Oct 24
This Points To Significantly Higher Silver Prices - 27th Oct 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Rumours of the Death of the U.S. Economy are Premature, Sovereign Debt Exchange For Equity

Economics / US Debt Aug 29, 2010 - 05:45 AM GMT

By: Brian_Bloom

Economics

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleConventional wisdom states that levels of Public Debt – in particular in the USA – are too high and there are only three possible outcomes:

  1. Helicopter Ben’s so-called Quantitative Easing leading to hyperinflation in the USA
  2. Debt default leading to Depression
  3. A sideways moving economy for 10-15 years accompanied by churning markets as income is used to repay debt. (A side-effect of this approach will be that tax rates will likely rise significantly even as standards of living decline).

The purpose of this article is to draw reader’s attention to a fourth possibility. Sovereign debt can be exchanged for equity – which is essentially how the Latin American crisis was resolved (?) in the 1980s.

The weekly chart below of the S&P 500 Industrial Index (courtesy DecisionPoint.com) shows that the Industrial markets in the USA are on the brink of another leg down.

The reader’s attention is drawn, specifically, to the position of the 17 week Moving Average (green line) relative to the 43 week Moving Average (purple line). Whilst the green line is still tracking above the purple line, the last time it crossed over was in December 2008 and this presaged the (first) Financial Crisis. Should it happen a second time what will follow from an economic perspective will likely be both severe and painful.

If we look at the same index (The $SPX) on a 3% X 3 Box reversal Point & Figure chart (courtesy stockcharts.com),  we see that a break below 1015 is likely to be very serious, with a measured move target of 778 – a potential fall of 26% from current levels.

This analyst has been consistent in his assessment – for reasons that he has repeated so often as to have become boring – that the probability of Primary Bear Market continuing for 10-15 years is high.

The question is: What will be the response of the authorities? Will they man the printing presses? Will they stand back and allow the markets to crumble? Will they do what they can to maintain the status quo?

From a financial perspective, the core issue is “sovereign debt” – as can be seen from the chart below: (source: http://www.businessinsider.com/pimcos-ring-of-fire-chart-shows-the-true-state-of-sovereign-debt-2010-1 )

US Debt as a percentage of US GDP is now in excess of 75% and trending towards 100%.

What many people appear to forget is that international trade is a zero sum game. When one country has a negative trade balance and is running down forex reserves, another one has a positive trade balance and its forex reserves are rising.  Profits become reserves, which are assets.

All balance sheets require double sided entries. Assets are funded by liabilities and accumulated shareholder funds.  Profitable countries like China have, effectively, high levels of shareholder funds relative to debt whilst unprofitable countries like those above in the ring of fire have high levels of debt relative to shareholder funds.

It follows that if liabilities rise to too high a level, perhaps its time for the debtor countries to raise the proportion of equity on their balance sheets. They can do this by selling off assets and using the proceeds to pay down their debts – or by increasing their shareholder equity.

Essentially, that is what “privatisation” has been all about.

But privatisation was really a sleight of hand. The argument wasn’t focused on debt:equity swaps, it was focused on operational efficiency. The argument was that public assets in private hands could be managed more efficiently. (And oh, incidentally, we will raise a bunch of cash).

Well, let’s focus on the debt:equity swap issue specifically. It is conceivably possible that, if the US (as an example) can raise sufficient capital to pay down its debts by selling off assets then, provided it can balance its budget thereafter, it can start to think about rebuilding its economic infrastructure.

Against this background of rising debts and potentially falling equity markets, the US Dollar is showing surprising strength – as can be seen from  the chart below (Courtesy decisionpoint.com)

Note how the 20 day Moving Average bounced up from the 200 day MA and how it seems to be wanting to cross over the 50 day MA which is tracking above the 200 day MA.

When we look at the Point & Figure Chart (courtesy stockcharts.com) it seems to be anticipating a measured move target of  114.

So this begs the question: If the Stock Market is looking so vulnerable, why is the US Dollar looking strong?

One facile reason might be that the bond market is looking unusually strong – as can be seen from the following chart – and on the face of it, perhaps it’s too strong.

Why is there such a demand for bonds?

The conventional argument is “flight to safety”.

But how can the bond market be regarded as a “safe haven” given the historically high levels of Public Debt. As of last night, for example, US Public Debt was $13.38 trillion (source: http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np ):

With such a high level of debt, surely the US Government represents a credit risk?

Well now, let’s refocus our attention on something that is seemingly outside the box. “Democracy” is defined as “Government of the people by the people for the people”.  There is no real differentiation between the government and the public. The government is appointed to represent the public.  What the government owns,  belongs to the public. What the government owes is owed by the public – hence the term “public” debt.

As an aside, in a communist environment, by contrast, what the public owns belongs to the government.  Communism is a function of a different mindset.  Socialism is a neither here nor there concept. Think of a dart board. If the first dart lands on double one and the second dart lands on double 20 you are not, on average, hitting the bull’s eye. Socialism kind of argues that you are.

OK, so in a truly democratic  environment where the government has amassed huge debts what has really happened is that it has amassed those debts as representatives of the public. The question is: Does the public have the assets to cover the total obligations of the public plus the government?

The chart below (source:   http://www.wordyard.com/2010/07/19/party-context-of-that-staggering-debt-chart/ ) shows total US (public and private debt) at 357% of GDP

By implication, if US GDP is around $14 trillion this implies total debt of around $50 trillion.

Well, that’s the liabilities side. What does the asset side of the balance sheet look like?

Back of the envelop calculations, ignoring foreign ownership:

A. Domestic Real Estate

Number of housing units in 2009: 129,925,421 (source: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html )

Median Value of owner-occupied housing units in 2000: $119,600 (source: ibid)

Total value of all housing units in USA, assuming all are at median 2000 value:

$15.5 trillion

B. Equity Markets

Quote:

 “year-to-date return [of the Wilshire 5000 Index] to -5.83 percent and resulted in an estimated decrease in market value of $1.6 trillion”

Source: http://www.wilshire.com/Company/June_2010_Wilshire_Indexes_News_Release.pdf

Bloom calculation: $1.6 trillion / .0583 = implied value of US Equities at June 30th 2010 of:

$27.4 Trillion

C. Capital Markets

It might surprise some readers to discover that of the $12.8 trillion public debt outstanding as at March 2010, only 3.9 trillion was held by foreigners. Therefore, approximately $8.9 trillion represented “assets” in the hands of local investors.

Source: www.fms.treas.gov/bulletin/b2010_2ofs.doc

In Q1 of 2010, the total size of the US Bond Market (assets in the hands of investors) was:

$35.2 Trillion

Source: http://www.sifma.org/research/research.aspx?ID=10806

Analyst observation:

Readers are starting to get the point. Although the total outstanding US debts are around $50 trillion, these are backed by assets well in excess of $75 trillion, ignoring foreign ownership, which is only a small proportion of the total.

Importantly, these are “tangible” assets. One cannot just ignore the value of Intellectual Property and neither can ignore the value of state and/or corporate owned real estate. In particular, Intellectual Property is where the true value of the US entrepreneurial culture lies.

D. The Value of Entrepreneurialism and Intellectual Property

Let’s now focus on this particular issue. Time Magazine recently ran an article entitled How the Stimulus Is Changing America which can be found at http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2013683-1,00.html

The following is a relevant quote:

“For starters, the Recovery Act is the most ambitious energy legislation in history, converting the Energy Department into the world's largest venture-capital fund. It's pouring $90 billion into clean energy, including unprecedented investments in a smart grid; energy efficiency; electric cars; renewable power from the sun, wind and earth; cleaner coal; advanced biofuels; and factories to manufacture green stuff in the U.S. The act will also triple the number of smart electric meters in our homes, quadruple the number of hybrids in the federal auto fleet and finance far-out energy research through a new government incubator modeled after the Pentagon agency that fathered the Internet.

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2013683-1,00.html#ixzz0xx7aCmd9

Conclusion

Through a process of financial engineering involving (possibly) Sovereign Debt:Equity swaps, the proportions of debt and equity on the US Sovereign Balance Sheet can be rebalanced. The country has more than sufficient assets and it will be a function of financial creativity.

Thereafter, with a waning interest burden on the national economy, the energy related “drivers” of the new economy which are now being put in place (see the Time Magazine article) can be relied upon to create employment opportunities. Yes, the world economy will still need to go through a period of painful readjustment. Yes, we will need to re-introduce at corporate and Government Board Level the concepts of integrity and value-for-money in respect of services rendered. Yes, it will take several years for the reorganization process to be completed. But, as Mark Twain once put it “Rumours of my death are premature”. Talk of “Hyperinflation” and “financial chaos” should be taken with a pinch of salt. The end is by no means nigh, even if the Primary Trend of the equity markets remains bearish for 10-15 years.

By Brian Bloom

www.beyondneanderthal.com

Once in a while a book comes along that ‘nails’ the issues of our times. Brian Bloom has demonstrated an uncanny ability to predict world events, sometimes even before they are on the media radar. First he predicted the world financial crisis and its timing, then the increasing controversies regarding the causes of climate change. Next will be a dawning understanding that humanity must embrace radically new thought paradigms with regard to energy, or face extinction.

Via the medium of its lighthearted and entertaining storyline, Beyond Neanderthal highlights the common links between Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism and Taoism and draws attention to an alternative energy source known to the Ancients. How was this common knowledge lost? Have ego and testosterone befuddled our thought processes? The Muslim population is now approaching 1.6 billion across the planet. The clash of civilizations between Judeo-Christians and Muslims is heightening. Is there a peaceful way to diffuse this situation or will ego and testosterone get in the way of that too? Beyond Neanderthal makes the case for a possible way forward on both the energy and the clash of civilizations fronts.

Copies of Beyond Neanderthal may be ordered via www.beyondneanderthal.com or from Amazon

Copyright © 2010 Brian Bloom - All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Brian Bloom Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Comments

dincer
29 Aug 10, 14:14
flawed reasoning

I want to remind Mr. Bloom something: if a substantial part (%20-30) of indebted people want to pay off his debt by selling his stocks, bonds or real estate; equity, bond and real estate markets surely collapse, but his mortgage or consumer credit obligations don't change, since they are nominal and almost constant values. In addition, top 1% of population owns 45% of financial wealth whereas only 5% of debt. Bottom 80% of population owns 7% of financial wealth and bottom 90% owes 75% of debt. I think your reasoning lacks those facts.



23 Mar 11, 16:11
us economy

sorry, but some of your stats are quite skewed.

there may be a reason why 1% of the population has 45% of the wealth. a good portion of their debt may be located within their companies and their holdings. it's still debt, but reallocated from personal to business. therefore, personal debt totals compared to the country total will appear unbalanced.

you might also thought out your argument a little more when you said 1% of the population has "only 5% of debt". if it were equal, 1% would have 1% debt, wouldn't it? but instead they have 5 times more that they are carrying. it's all in the way you look at it, wouldn't you say?

in addition, if you're going to indiscriminately quote stats, you should also have noted that 1% of the population pays 33.7% of the taxes, while at the same time the bottom 50% of the population only pays 2%. so essentially the top 50% of the country is bearing the brunt of the entire country, how is that fair?

on a side note, if someone either doesn't have a lot of money or doesn't know how to, how can they end up with a significant mortgage or consumer credit?


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in