Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Stocks, Bitcoin and Crypto Markets Breaking Bad on Donald Trump Pump - 21st Nov 24
Gold Price To Re-Test $2,700 - 21st Nov 24
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: This Is My Strong Warning To You - 21st Nov 24
Financial Crisis 2025 - This is Going to Shock People! - 21st Nov 24
Dubai Deluge - AI Tech Stocks Earnings Correction Opportunities - 18th Nov 24
Why President Trump Has NO Real Power - Deep State Military Industrial Complex - 8th Nov 24
Social Grant Increases and Serge Belamant Amid South Africa's New Political Landscape - 8th Nov 24
Is Forex Worth It? - 8th Nov 24
Nvidia Numero Uno in Count Down to President Donald Pump Election Victory - 5th Nov 24
Trump or Harris - Who Wins US Presidential Election 2024 Forecast Prediction - 5th Nov 24
Stock Market Brief in Count Down to US Election Result 2024 - 3rd Nov 24
Gold Stocks’ Winter Rally 2024 - 3rd Nov 24
Why Countdown to U.S. Recession is Underway - 3rd Nov 24
Stock Market Trend Forecast to Jan 2025 - 2nd Nov 24
President Donald PUMP Forecast to Win US Presidential Election 2024 - 1st Nov 24
At These Levels, Buying Silver Is Like Getting It At $5 In 2003 - 28th Oct 24
Nvidia Numero Uno Selling Shovels in the AI Gold Rush - 28th Oct 24
The Future of Online Casinos - 28th Oct 24
Panic in the Air As Stock Market Correction Delivers Deep Opps in AI Tech Stocks - 27th Oct 24
Stocks, Bitcoin, Crypto's Counting Down to President Donald Pump! - 27th Oct 24
UK Budget 2024 - What to do Before 30th Oct - Pensions and ISA's - 27th Oct 24
7 Days of Crypto Opportunities Starts NOW - 27th Oct 24
The Power Law in Venture Capital: How Visionary Investors Like Yuri Milner Have Shaped the Future - 27th Oct 24
This Points To Significantly Higher Silver Prices - 27th Oct 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Unemployment: How Do We Measure A Shortage Of Work?

Economics / US Economy Jan 23, 2009 - 06:16 AM GMT

By: Ronald_R_Cooke

Economics Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleA Modest Proposal - According to the U. S. Department of Labor (DOL), employers cut 524,000 jobs in December, 2008. The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate increased to 7.2%. That’s bad news for a struggling economy. Unemployed people have fewer spending options. They tend to buy only what they absolutely need. Food tops the list. Rent or mortgage payments come next. Then utility bills, emergency medical expenses, and money for transportation – most likely in the form of car or truck payments and fuel. Purchases of clothing, a new car, electronics, toys, and so on can be deferred. Savings erode all too quickly. Personal confidence ebbs. Family life is strained.


But December’s unemployment numbers do not tell the whole story. It would appear the unemployment rate could exceed 10% before the end of 2009. And although media reporters and pundits like to focus on the unemployment rate as a benchmark for how bad things are, they are ignoring a far more important number.

Total unemployment plus under-employment.

Call it the Work Shortage Index (WSI).

Why is this number important? Aside from its use as a measure of human misery, it also gives us an indication of how many consumers are being forced to curtail their spending. The DOL attempts to provide an alternative measure of labor under-utilization in Table A-12, U-6. For December, 2008 “Total Unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force, plus all marginally attached workers was 13.5%”. If my math is correct: A total labor force of 154,349,000 persons X 13.5% = 20,837,000 “under-utilized” workers. From their point of view, there is a shortage of work.

I did my own WSI estimate. I wanted to know how many people were either unemployed or under-employed, wanted to work, and were available for work.* From a cultural perspective, these people – and their families – are experiencing a growing sense of personal tension that inevitably leads to frustration and anger. Historically, that has frequently led to momentous social change. In terms of economics, these people are not making enough money to sustain their potential (or usual) rate of consumption. In our current economy, the decline of consumer spending power is contributing to fixed asset depreciation, corporate contraction, and lower GDP.

Using DOL/BLS* A Table data, we start with a total labor force (age 16 or older) of 154,349,000 workers. Of this number:

9,468,000 are looking for full time work

1,531,000 are looking for part time work

That gives us a total unemployment figure of 10,999,000, or 7.1 %.

To this we add:

· 1,200,000 estimated number of people who have become discouraged and are no longer looking for work, or have been unable to find a job they able to take;

· 3,186,000 estimated number of people who usually work full time, but are working part time because they can not find full time employment;

· 1,562,000 estimated number of people who are working part time, but would like to find a full time job;

· 829,000 estimated number of self-employed persons who left the labor force in 2008 because they could not find work;

· 5,711,000 estimated number of self-employed persons who are unable to find enough work to keep them employed on a full time basis.

That gives a total of 23,487,000 unemployed or under-employed persons, and a Work Shortage Index of 15.2%.

Think about it. That’s over 23 million people, and their families, whose financial wellbeing has been restricted by a shortage of work. Worse, the longer the recession - the higher this index. As the recession drags on, employers tend to schedule fewer hours of work, place additional workers on part time employment, and find ways to eliminate jobs. Self-employed persons find it increasingly difficult to find productive work. And another key point: Under-employment increases faster than unemployment as earning power erodes.

If unemployment climbs above 10% in 2009, we can expect the Work Shortage Index to exceed 21.9%. Over 33.5 million Americans would be forced to sharply curtail their spending. Over 27% of all American households would be in financial trouble. Not only would that curtail consumer spending, it would also prolong our existing housing crisis and extend the depth of our existing financial crisis.

Counting noses to determine employment status is certainly useful. That’s the methodology used by the DOL/BLS to collect the unemployment data usually quoted by the media. But if we want to measure the economic impact of restricted spending, we need to find out how many hours people are actually working for money. For example, one may be tallied as being self-employed, but that in no way tells us if a self-employed person is actually making any money. Think of all the independent real estate agents, contractors, carpenters, electricians, health care workers – and so on, who are unable to find enough work that pays hard money.

These people are under-employed.

Conclusion

We can have a lively discussion about my methodology, but the basic thesis will not change. If we want to measure how a shortage of work impacts our economy, we should take a look at adding under-employment statistics to unemployment data.

*All data is from the January 2009 DOL/Bureau of Labor Statistics A tables, which are not corrected for seasonality

Ronald R. Cooke
The Cultural Economist
Author:  Detensive Nation
www.tce.name

Cultural economics is the study of how we interact with economic events and conditions. Culture, in this sense, includes our political systems, religious beliefs, psychology, history, customs, arts, sciences, and education. The term "Economics" refers to the extent and process of how we employ capital, labor and materials. If human existence is dynamic, then economics – as a science – must be able to characterize the interaction of culture and economics in contemporaneous terms.

Ronald R Cooke Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in