Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Stocks, Bitcoin and Crypto Markets Breaking Bad on Donald Trump Pump - 21st Nov 24
Gold Price To Re-Test $2,700 - 21st Nov 24
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: This Is My Strong Warning To You - 21st Nov 24
Financial Crisis 2025 - This is Going to Shock People! - 21st Nov 24
Dubai Deluge - AI Tech Stocks Earnings Correction Opportunities - 18th Nov 24
Why President Trump Has NO Real Power - Deep State Military Industrial Complex - 8th Nov 24
Social Grant Increases and Serge Belamant Amid South Africa's New Political Landscape - 8th Nov 24
Is Forex Worth It? - 8th Nov 24
Nvidia Numero Uno in Count Down to President Donald Pump Election Victory - 5th Nov 24
Trump or Harris - Who Wins US Presidential Election 2024 Forecast Prediction - 5th Nov 24
Stock Market Brief in Count Down to US Election Result 2024 - 3rd Nov 24
Gold Stocks’ Winter Rally 2024 - 3rd Nov 24
Why Countdown to U.S. Recession is Underway - 3rd Nov 24
Stock Market Trend Forecast to Jan 2025 - 2nd Nov 24
President Donald PUMP Forecast to Win US Presidential Election 2024 - 1st Nov 24
At These Levels, Buying Silver Is Like Getting It At $5 In 2003 - 28th Oct 24
Nvidia Numero Uno Selling Shovels in the AI Gold Rush - 28th Oct 24
The Future of Online Casinos - 28th Oct 24
Panic in the Air As Stock Market Correction Delivers Deep Opps in AI Tech Stocks - 27th Oct 24
Stocks, Bitcoin, Crypto's Counting Down to President Donald Pump! - 27th Oct 24
UK Budget 2024 - What to do Before 30th Oct - Pensions and ISA's - 27th Oct 24
7 Days of Crypto Opportunities Starts NOW - 27th Oct 24
The Power Law in Venture Capital: How Visionary Investors Like Yuri Milner Have Shaped the Future - 27th Oct 24
This Points To Significantly Higher Silver Prices - 27th Oct 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Glenn Hubbard Wannabe Fed Chairman Devises New Bailout Plan

Interest-Rates / Credit Crisis Bailouts Nov 11, 2008 - 07:32 AM GMT

By: Brady_Willett

Interest-Rates Although he didn't get the nomination to replace Greenspan, Columbia's Glenn Hubbard often comments on what he believes is the best path for policymakers to take. Yesterday Mr. Hubbard was at it again, offering a brief commentary on the Nightly Business Report:


“Policymakers should take action to blunt expected future declines in house prices…Consensus forecasts predict additional house price declines of 15 percent over the next 18 months. If we could lower mortgage interest rates by one percentage point, we could blunt this decline. And we can accomplish this change without costly new subsidies.”

Hubbard has devised a new bailout plan to stop housing prices from falling that won't cost that much - wonderful!.  Unfortunately this may not the case:

“…Financing mechanisms are available for the government to lower current borrowing costs for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and lower mortgage rates and raise house prices.” [bolds added]

Financing mechanisms are available to lower borrowing costs for Fannie and Freddie?  Isn't this akin to saying the government can lend money to itself more cheaply? Granted, it wouldn't take an entirely ‘new' bailout scheme to enact this type of plan, but isn't added taxpayer exposure to the already bailed out Freddie and Fannie potentially very ‘costly' Mr. Hubbard? 

As for Hubbard's assumption that lower mortgage rates raise house prices (recent activity in the U.S. housing market would suggest otherwise), in October Hubbard said “The price of a home is partially dependent on the mortgage rate” and “Rising mortgage spreads and down-payment requirements are what's still driving down housing prices.” In other words, Hubbard believes that lowering mortgage rates/spreads and loosening down-payment requirements could help ‘blunt' the decline in housing prices.  Also from October, Hubbard said that government endorsed mortgages “would be backed by houses and the verified ability to repay the debt by millions of Americans” , and that for borrowers with lower credit scores, the mortgage rate would be greater [ than Hubbard's prescribed rate].”  Apparently since these details infringed upon the optimistic noise Hubbard wanted to espouse on NBR they were not mentioned.

Suffice to say, Hubbard is reticent to acknowledge that falling mortgage rates are not a panacea.  He is also myopically ignoring common sense when he says that his “plan could offer a $100 billion annual stimulus.” Where in the world did Hubbard pull this $100 billion figure from anyway? The answer, again, may come from his comments made back in October:

“So if home prices increased 10% above where they would have been without government intervention, we estimate consumers will have an additional $100 billion annually to spend.”

Remember, Mr. Hubbard is a well respected professor that almost became Chairman of Federal Reserve, not a crackpot. If you ignore the costs of a housing bailout consumers could have an $100 billion to spend if housing prices increase by 10%?  Baffling, to say the least.

There are real costs when trying to stop housing prices from falling Mr. Hubbard, and these costs are already threatening to build: Yesterday Fannie Mae reported a $29 billion loss for 3Q08 and warned that the government's $100 billion lifeline may not be enough, and Freddie Mac is expected to report terrible results later this week. In other words, while Hubbard's plan to further utilize the Fannie and Freddie bailout conduit is plausible but not without costs, financial losses lead to the creeping possibility that more taxpayer funds will be required to simply keep these conduits solvent in the future.  Imagine Hubbard as a chef preparing his secret recipe, all the while unsure if his oven is about to blow-up.

November 10, 2008: http://www.pbs.org/nbr/site/onair/transcripts/081110c/
October 2, 2008: First, Let's Stabilize Home Prices Hubbard

By Brady Willett
FallStreet.com

FallStreet.com was launched in January of 2000 with the mandate of providing an alternative opinion on the U.S. equity markets.  In the context of an uncritical herd euphoria that characterizes the mainstream media, Fallstreet strives to provide investors with the information they need to make informed investment decisions. To that end, we provide a clearinghouse for bearish and value-oriented investment information, independent research, and an investment newsletter containing specific company selections.

Brady Willett Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in