Why Cheap Oil is Great for the Oil Majors
Commodities / Oil Companies Oct 24, 2008 - 10:46 AM GMT
For the last 3 years, the world's oil majors have not had an easy time from the oil producing states. Increasing oil prices has led to a complacent attitude by oil reliant governments. This often masks inefficiency, sometimes corruption, and has led to high taxation coupled with unsound business practices. Russia's oil production for instance, has been reducing each year despite the governments desire to increase output.
Easy credit and a speculative environment has resulted in many new oil companies coming to the market, with high valuations and little, if any, proven reserves. As the oil price increased so did the tax receipts and so did the smaller companies share prices. This resulted in state influenced companies investing less and the global situation where finding new oil, or purchasing oil reserves, became ever more expensive due to the barrel price and the demand for people and equipment.
Times change, oil is now trading around $65 per barrel, a 16 month low, but still way above it's 2002 price of $25. Prior to this it has not been higher than $30 since 1987. Was $25 artificially low, has China, India and Russia really started using so much more oil in the last six years that oil should be substantially more than $25? Who knows, but from a long term investment, the price can be ignored. The share price of the large oil companies does not fluctuate with the price of oil, and nor should it. Long term contracts and many different aspects to the business means the month-by-month barrel price makes little difference to revenues and earnings. A world recession will make a difference but the long-term case for building an investment over the next 12 months is compelling.
The current price of oil is very bad news for many of the OPEC countries whose governments, or ruling factions, often manage to exist through maintaining social programs funded by oil receipts. Russia less so, but it's hugely dependent on oil revenues and the health of the oil industry. These countries have followed the rest of the western world and spent while the going was good, but now it's a different story. Consider that to balance the books, Russia needs oil above $70, Iran and Venezuela need $80 and a similar figure for all the rest.
So what are the likely actions of oil producing countries, state influenced companies and the impact to the majors?
If we assume that the oil price continues to fall, or not recover, and that demand falls or production is cut, then none of this is good news for the oil states. In a slowing world economy it is likely that all three will occur. Apart from making life very difficult for the leaders of the countries dependent on oil, it is likely to result in less investment in the industry. When the economic cycle turns, as it will, they will turn to the majors to bring in expertise and assistance with increasing output and efficiency with a need to enter new or enhanced joint ventures.
They will also be more open to providing access to possible reserves that they do not have the skill or experience to develop. The majors will negotiate hard in any venture or partnership remembering the treatment received during the last few years, the obvious example being the tactics and problems encountered with the TNK-BP venture. For their own future planning the major's use a long-term investment assumption of $ 30 - $40 per barrel, so any investments in their own business should not be too badly impacted by the lower barrel price. An additional benefit is that the planned investments will not be competing for the physical and human resources that have been so scarce for the last few years.
This situation cannot be said, however, for the many small oil producers and explorers who's share price is almost totally dependent on the barrel price. Large oil companies are well funded and have access to credit, which many of these smaller companies do not, and this makes them highly vulnerable to being taken over at depressed prices by the majors, thus acquiring long term reserves at sensible prices. There is certainly no shortage of small companies, which have been funded by other people's money, that now look attractive targets.
In medium to long term we are looking at a relatively healthy and well prepared commercial industry, with the state influenced sector under invested and in a weaker position. This might not be good for the economy as again it indicates supply and demand imbalances, but the oil major's plan for volatile oil prices, they always have done and always will do.
So the fall in demand will impact the large oil companies but this is a short term impact and many of these firms have been around for a long time and are used to planning for economic cycles. The cycle is key to the reason why these companies now make a compelling case for investment. If we assume that within 3 -5 years the world economy starts to grow again, and continues it's upward path of growth, which it always has done, the long term benefits of cheaper reserves and under investment by others will be good for the future of the independent oil companies. With good yields, strong balance sheets and a long term growing market it gives a strong argument for investing into the likes of Exxon, Chevron, BP and Shell over the next twelve months as a traditional buy and hold stock.
By John Henry
www.sensibleinvesting1. blogspot.com
John is a private investor who manages his own investments. He has been
interested and involved with the markets for 18 years. Over this time has
developed an investment style based on the principals that the markets are
not rational and by using a value approach you can take advantage of markets
ultimately driven by emotion.
© 2008 Copyright
John Henry
- All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.
John Henry Archive |
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.