Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Stocks Correct into Bitcoin Happy Thanks Halving - Earnings Season Buying Opps - 4th July 24
24 Hours Until Clown Rishi Sunak is Booted Out of Number 10 - UIK General Election 2024 - 4th July 24
Clown Rishi Delivers Tory Election Bloodbath, Labour 400+ Seat Landslide - 1st July 24
Bitcoin Happy Thanks Halving - Crypto's Exist Strategy - 30th June 24
Is a China-Taiwan Conflict Likely? Watch the Region's Stock Market Indexes - 30th June 24
Gold Mining Stocks Record Quarter - 30th June 24
Could Low PCE Inflation Take Gold to the Moon? - 30th June 24
UK General Election 2024 Result Forecast - 26th June 24
AI Stocks Portfolio Accumulate and Distribute - 26th June 24
Gold Stocks Reloading - 26th June 24
Gold Price Completely Unsurprising Reversal and Next Steps - 26th June 24
Inflation – How It Started And Where We Are Now - 26th June 24
Can Stock Market Bad Breadth Be Good? - 26th June 24
How to Capitalise on the Robots - 20th June 24
Bitcoin, Gold, and Copper Paint a Coherent Picture - 20th June 24
Why a Dow Stock Market Peak Will Boost Silver - 20th June 24
QI Group: Leading With Integrity and Impactful Initiatives - 20th June 24
Tesla Robo Taxis are Coming THIS YEAR! - 16th June 24
Will NVDA Crash the Market? - 16th June 24
Inflation Is Dead! Or Is It? - 16th June 24
Investors Are Forever Blowing Bubbles - 16th June 24
Stock Market Investor Sentiment - 8th June 24
S&P 494 Stocks Then & Now - 8th June 24
As Stocks Bears Begin To Hibernate, It's Now Time To Worry About A Bear Market - 8th June 24
Gold, Silver and Crypto | How Charts Look Before US Dollar Meltdown - 8th June 24
Gold & Silver Get Slammed on Positive Economic Reports - 8th June 24
Gold Summer Doldrums - 8th June 24
S&P USD Correction - 7th June 24
Israel's Smoke and Mirrors Fake War on Gaza - 7th June 24
US Banking Crisis 2024 That No One Is Paying Attention To - 7th June 24
The Fed Leads and the Market Follows? It's a Big Fat MYTH - 7th June 24
How Much Gold Is There In the World? - 7th June 24
Is There a Financial Crisis Bubbling Under the Surface? - 7th June 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Too Much Capital

Stock-Markets / Economic Theory Jul 17, 2017 - 05:02 PM GMT

By: Submissions

Stock-Markets

Henri Schneider writes: Truisms and banalities: Investors must be able to assess the productivity of their capital. This is done by comparing returns to interest rates. But what, if all interest rates are rigged? What if they are artificially lower than they should be? Then, not only too much capital is invested, but it is invested in the wrong places. Even more pressing: what if there is simply too much capital in the financial system?


For sure, financial markets are up, investors are happy, politicians – central bankers just being a peculiar type of politicians – enjoy the merriment. But the population of question marks regarding the actual cycle is also increasing.

Is there real investment appetite in financial markets or is the upward trend a function of cheap central-bank money? Is a bull-cycle of roughly 7-years the fruit of higher productivity or a result of central-banks unwillingness to raise interest-rates? Is it the nature of development that tech assets and internet companies have higher valuations than those firms that produce stuff an employ people?

For sure, all these question marks have always been there. And they will always be. But keep in mind that in the cycle before the 2007-09 crisis, a similar discussion took place. Low interest rates that remained for an overly long period of time; cheap money created and circulated by central banks; and the built-up of capital in asset classes that turned out to not to be the ones that mattered – these were all features of the 2000s bull-cycle.

Back then, no person of sane mind would question the pace of globalization. No one would dare putting a question mark behind housing. Not even the craziest would contest the financial engineers’ ability to build products. Even the diehard atheists were convinced of the god-likeliness of the Chairman (of the Fed, that is).

Today, many of the same question marks remain but can be applied to different trends, sectors and skills. The trouble is twofold. First, there is too much capital in the system. The more capital there is and the more this capital deviates from the natural investment stock, the harder is the landing. Once market-agents realize that they were valuating a capital stock much higher than the real demand for that stock is, its value implodes – crisis. Second, the more this capital-stock deviates from the natural preference for capital or assets, the longer it takes to correct this misallocation – long crisis.

Granted: The “natural” investment stock and the “natural” preference for assets seem difficult to find out. But “natural” means nothing more than what market agents would do if there weren’t interventions from central bankers pouring money into the system and lowering interest-rates. “Natural” is only what agents would do if they were to choose freely, invest per their own risk-budgets and with their own money. All of these three are currently hindered by monetary policies.

Truisms and banalities? Of course. When investors use their own money, act per their individual risk-budges and choose freely, the risk of financial crises is considerably lower. Even if they hit, markets can shake off the effects of by themselves quickly. However, the next crisis is born when central banks meddle either by keeping interest rates low or by creating too much capital. Both of them being done right now.

Henrique Schneider is the chief economist of the Swiss Federation of Small and Medium Enterprises and board member in different funds and asset managers.

New Books
Mehr als Helden: Menschen; Portrait überraschender Liberaler
https://tinyurl.com/yceyvhpr

Uber: Innovation in Society
https://tinyurl.com/ycljdjwb

Creative Destruction and the Sharing Economy
https://tinyurl.com/y7apcebg

Indifferenz, Gegnerschaft, Identität: Veränderungen im politischen Verhältnis von Dorf und Staat im Kosovo
https://tinyurl.com/y8yzhlhd

Copyright © 2017 Henri Schneider - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.


© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in