Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Stocks, Bitcoin and Crypto Markets Breaking Bad on Donald Trump Pump - 21st Nov 24
Gold Price To Re-Test $2,700 - 21st Nov 24
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: This Is My Strong Warning To You - 21st Nov 24
Financial Crisis 2025 - This is Going to Shock People! - 21st Nov 24
Dubai Deluge - AI Tech Stocks Earnings Correction Opportunities - 18th Nov 24
Why President Trump Has NO Real Power - Deep State Military Industrial Complex - 8th Nov 24
Social Grant Increases and Serge Belamant Amid South Africa's New Political Landscape - 8th Nov 24
Is Forex Worth It? - 8th Nov 24
Nvidia Numero Uno in Count Down to President Donald Pump Election Victory - 5th Nov 24
Trump or Harris - Who Wins US Presidential Election 2024 Forecast Prediction - 5th Nov 24
Stock Market Brief in Count Down to US Election Result 2024 - 3rd Nov 24
Gold Stocks’ Winter Rally 2024 - 3rd Nov 24
Why Countdown to U.S. Recession is Underway - 3rd Nov 24
Stock Market Trend Forecast to Jan 2025 - 2nd Nov 24
President Donald PUMP Forecast to Win US Presidential Election 2024 - 1st Nov 24
At These Levels, Buying Silver Is Like Getting It At $5 In 2003 - 28th Oct 24
Nvidia Numero Uno Selling Shovels in the AI Gold Rush - 28th Oct 24
The Future of Online Casinos - 28th Oct 24
Panic in the Air As Stock Market Correction Delivers Deep Opps in AI Tech Stocks - 27th Oct 24
Stocks, Bitcoin, Crypto's Counting Down to President Donald Pump! - 27th Oct 24
UK Budget 2024 - What to do Before 30th Oct - Pensions and ISA's - 27th Oct 24
7 Days of Crypto Opportunities Starts NOW - 27th Oct 24
The Power Law in Venture Capital: How Visionary Investors Like Yuri Milner Have Shaped the Future - 27th Oct 24
This Points To Significantly Higher Silver Prices - 27th Oct 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Calling out the Central Bankers

Politics / Central Banks Apr 28, 2017 - 06:40 PM GMT

By: Rodney_Johnson

Politics I’m a fan of the Marvel Comics movies, like X-Men and Iron Man.

My lovely wife often catches me watching tidbits of the Avenger films when I sit down in front of the TV to relax for a few minutes. I’ll flip around until I find one, watch just 20 to 30 minutes, then move on to another project in the house.

It drives her nuts!

I know the ending. The characters use their skills to better the world. They have clear goals, choose their targets, and execute. These are nice, neat packages, which is completely unlike the real world.


Unless you ask central bankers.

For some reason, over the last 20 years and especially in the last decade, people have attributed Marvel-like superhuman knowledge and power to those who manage currency, money supply, and interest rates.

And the bankers appear to believe it, even though it’s not just irrational, it’s demonstrably false.

As we peer in the windows of their great halls, these figures traipse around as if in capes and costumes, espousing great theories on what should happen, only to note in their press conferences that the world isn’t turning out according to plan. Right.

Ben Bernanke was no Captain America, Mario Draghi isn’t Iron Man, and Janet Yellen isn’t the Black Widow. And by the way, these characters are fictional!

Central bankers have to live in the real world where drawing lines on a graph is easy, but getting consumers to comply with the economic theory is hard.

We have our own ideas of what to do with our money, thank you very much.

Which gets back to the problem at hand.

Central bankers are full of it… economic theory, that is. But short on success. And the recent conversation about soft inflation targets proves the point.

For years – years! – the Fed has noted a 2% inflation target as measured by the personal consumption expenditure (PCE), which is a bit different from the consumer price index, but close.

The goal was to boost the economy through monetary policy to the point that growth, which should drive up wages, would lead to higher prices. Well, here we are. The PCE now sits just over 2%, with core PCE (minus food and energy), just under the magic level.

But there’s a problem.

Wage are rising at a snail’s pace, and GDP growth is anemic at best.

But hey, don’t fret! We’ve got inflation back! So even though the economy is stumbling and your income is flat, prices are higher!

Brilliant!

So, central bankers are doing what they’ve done before. Changing the target. Two percent inflation isn’t getting the job done, so now they’ll tolerate inflation around 2%, which means they will keep doling out easy money, keeping interest rates lower for longer, as they hope and pray for more growth and higher wages.

If this sounds like the same story we heard with unemployment, that’s because it is.

The Fed targeted unemployment of 5%, noting that when we fell back to that level, it should represent something close to full employment, where companies would have to bid for workers, driving up wages, and leading to faster economic growth.

We got 5% unemployment, and then 4.9%, and then 4.8%, and so on. We’ve been here for years. And yet, in 2016 the economy expanded by a mere 2%, and the Atlanta Fed estimates first quarter GDP at a whopping 0.5%. That’s annualized, so if the Atlanta Fed is right then the economy expanded by 0.125% in the first three months of this year!

Uh-oh. That didn’t work out so well.

And now, neither is inflation.

When things don’t work out, the Fed pulls out its technical manuals and tries to explain why the real world is so different from what they expected. All I hear is a bunch of B.S. that can be simply translated as, “We have no idea.”

Today we have classic stagflation, with low growth and rising prices.

The low growth is attributable to all the things we’ve covered before – an aging population, which leads to a flat or falling workforce, the Boomers saving for retirement instead of spending with abandon, and a debt hangover that’s been talked about ad nauseam, but not addressed.

We’ve got a few more years of this to deal with before the next large generation, the Millennials, takes control.

As for prices, it doesn’t take a genius to parse out the problem.

Housing is on the rise as builders take a cautious approach after getting smacked so hard in the meltdown.

Lower housing stock with a rising population leads to higher prices… but only as long as people can pay for them.

Medical costs – both services and insurance – are marching higher as the population ages.

And then there’s energy. After holding down costs for 18 months as prices cratered, the rebound in oil is now filtering through the economy.

This is not the inflation the Fed had hoped for.

Which leads to one conclusion: Central bankers do not know how to create growth. Period.

And guess what?

They shouldn’t.

It’s not their job.

We should never have asked that of them, which our politicians did when they realized they were economically powerless themselves in the downturn.

And the bankers should never have assumed that responsibility because they can’t deliver.

Instead of setting unrealistic goals about things they can’t control, central bankers should instead focus on giving the real economic drivers, business owners and managers, the best set of circumstances possible.

The arrangement is simple.

Go back to being the lender of last resort against quality collateral, and oversee the modest expansion of currency to match the demographic growth of the nation, while using experience-based rules for setting interest rate policy, like the Taylor Rule, so that everyone knew what rates would be as the economy changed over time.

If bankers used such an approach, chances are we’d never know their names, but they’d be doing the best thing they could to keep the nation on stable monetary footing.

I’m not getting my hopes up.

They’ll keep trying, and failing, which will lead to ever-changing targets and more uncertainty in the economy and markets.

It’s like a bad movie that just won’t end.

Rodney

Follow me on Twitter ;@RJHSDent

By Rodney Johnson, Senior Editor of Economy & Markets

http://economyandmarkets.com

Copyright © 2017 Rodney Johnson - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Rodney Johnson Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in