Most Popular
1. Banking Crisis is Stocks Bull Market Buying Opportunity - Nadeem_Walayat
2.The Crypto Signal for the Precious Metals Market - P_Radomski_CFA
3. One Possible Outcome to a New World Order - Raymond_Matison
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
5. Apple AAPL Stock Trend and Earnings Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
6.AI, Stocks, and Gold Stocks – Connected After All - P_Radomski_CFA
7.Stock Market CHEAT SHEET - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.US Debt Ceiling Crisis Smoke and Mirrors Circus - Nadeem_Walayat
9.Silver Price May Explode - Avi_Gilburt
10.More US Banks Could Collapse -- A Lot More- EWI
Last 7 days
US Presidential Election Cycle and Recessions - 18th Mar 24
US Recession Already Happened in 2022! - 18th Mar 24
AI can now remember everything you say - 18th Mar 24
Bitcoin Crypto Mania 2024 - MicroStrategy MSTR Blow off Top! - 14th Mar 24
Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - 11th Mar 24
Gold and the Long-Term Inflation Cycle - 11th Mar 24
Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - 11th Mar 24
Two Reasons The Fed Manipulates Interest Rates - 11th Mar 24
US Dollar Trend 2024 - 9th Mar 2024
The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - 9th Mar 2024
Investors Don’t Believe the Gold Rally, Still Prefer General Stocks - 9th Mar 2024
Paper Gold Vs. Real Gold: It's Important to Know the Difference - 9th Mar 2024
Stocks: What This "Record Extreme" Indicator May Be Signaling - 9th Mar 2024
My 3 Favorite Trade Setups - Elliott Wave Course - 9th Mar 2024
Bitcoin Crypto Bubble Mania! - 4th Mar 2024
US Interest Rates - When WIll the Fed Pivot - 1st Mar 2024
S&P Stock Market Real Earnings Yield - 29th Feb 2024
US Unemployment is a Fake Statistic - 29th Feb 2024
U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - 29th Feb 2024
What a Breakdown in Silver Mining Stocks! What an Opportunity! - 29th Feb 2024
Why AI will Soon become SA - Synthetic Intelligence - The Machine Learning Megatrend - 29th Feb 2024
Keep Calm and Carry on Buying Quantum AI Tech Stocks - 19th Feb 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Four Things Missing From Obama’s First-Ever Energy Review

Commodities / Energy Resources Apr 24, 2015 - 08:53 AM GMT

By: Money_Morning

Commodities

Dr. Kent Moors writes: The Obama administration just released its inaugural Quadrennial Energy Review (QER).

The aim of the 348-page report, which was ordered by a Presidential Memorandum in January 2014, is to help the U.S. government create a “comprehensive and integrated energy strategy” by identifying the roadblocks to providing affordable and secure energy and energy services for the country.


The QER‘s concerns mirror those I have considered here in OEI and even addressed before the queen’s Windsor Energy Consultation last month at Windsor Castle outside London.

And as the severity of the problems outlined in the QER become apparent, there are going to be some very nice opportunities for investors to profit.

However, the report neglected to address a number of key issues that are crucial to understanding the challenges in the energy sector.

Here’s my take on what really needs to be fixed…

The Crisis Is Approaching in Three Areas

The QER, which will see a regular release, will have its own multi-departmental and agency task force charged with making policy recommendations. The government’s intention here is to meet a need I have demanded we fill for some time: the development of a genuine national energy plan.

Highlighted in the government’s treatment are detailed indications of a crisis fast approaching in three areas:

  1. A huge replacement need for broad areas of energy delivery systems inside the U.S.
  2. A rising situation threatening the nation’s ability to transmit, store, and distribute energy (TSD)
  3. Some pretty serious security considerations weighing on the integrity of the overall TSD system.

But there are many very important factors the report does not consider. Of this rather long list, there are four I would emphasize here at what I hope is the first stage of a long and serious process.

Energy Report Doesn’t Examine the Global Picture

First, nothing outside the U.S. is considered. Such is to be expected; this is, after all, a domestic policy report. But given the integrated nature of the global energy system, what is occurring elsewhere will have a decisive impact on what is done within America’s borders.

The global crisis is far worse and dovetails into some of our most pressing security and terrorism concerns. At current projections, a widening percentage of the world’s population will be cut off from any access to energy…

Literally living in the dark and ripe for whatever radical movement comes by.

As I discussed in my Windsor briefing, there will be a huge global price tag to avoid international infrastructure collapse.

My estimate of essential requirements to avoid a “World Collapse Scenario” is $2-5 trillion by 2035 in targeted areas. Currently, there is a 40% shortfall; investment is down despite long-term funding supply expanding.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) Projected Need stands at $48 trillion (in the agency’s New Policies Scenario – $40 trillion for energy supply, $8 trillion for improved efficiency). The need increases to $53 trillion with the so-called “450 Scenario,” which seeks to limit the global increase in temperature to 2 degrees Celsius.

Energy Supply Will Require the Greatest Commitment

At current projections, we are moving toward merely buying a Band-Aid to patch over the troubles in the existing global energy network with approaches tied to national and corporate debt limitations. Put simply, most of the world will be unable to cope without massive population and lifestyle disruptions.

This is the slide I used at Windsor to break down what the IEA regards as required through 2035:

Rising energy demand is progressively moving away from the developed industrial nations to the developing world, as another of my presentation slides graphically indicated (once again using the IEA’s New Policies Scenario):

However, the most significant conclusion is this: Less than 50% of the infrastructure needs are to meet increasing demand. Most are to offset declining energy production. As we move forward, it is energy supply that will require the greatest commitment. For example, I estimate that as much as 80% of future capital needs in oil and gas will be upstream – that is, at the production or generation point – not in the TSD addressed by the QER.

How to Avoid Repeated Problems

That leads to the second factor. Infrastructure needs can be neither estimated nor met without primary consideration given to the energy production side. Infrastructure connects upstream, midstream (this is really what the report’s TSD centers on), and downstream (processing and wholesale/retail).

The cost of rescuing the national energy infrastructure resides in this interconnection.

Third, security concerns deal with both the physical assets and the logistical support – that is, how the system coordinates the movement of energy from one place to another. We need to identify primary points of vulnerability. Most of these will actually be targets of cyber-attacks.

Finally, a cohesive energy plan must ask a fundamental question. This involves what infrastructure we will pursue. Is it to be a cut-and-paste job, basically keeping the same system, repairing where necessary? Or do we use this as an opportunity to develop new approaches that are more efficient and easier to maintain?

This factor will be the most contentious, both politically and financially. It will have to address the energy balance we choose, the combination of traditional energy sources and alternative, renewable options. Some regions of the U.S. will fare better in this competition than others. And that guarantees some knock-down, drawn-out political donnybrooks.

Nonetheless, one thing is clear: Repeating the same processes will produce the same problems. Only this time, they will be more acute and more expensive.

This week’s QER release may be a major first move in finally meeting the real energy challenges facing the country.

But it is just a small first step in a very long process.

P.S. Right now, all 30 seats at my London energy conference have been claimed. However, we are setting up a wait list. If you would like to be added to the list, please call (855) 509-6600.

Source :http://oilandenergyinvestor.com/2015/04/four-things-missing-from-obamas-first-ever-energy-review/

Money Morning/The Money Map Report

©2015 Monument Street Publishing. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), of content from this website, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Monument Street Publishing. 105 West Monument Street, Baltimore MD 21201, Email: customerservice@moneymorning.com

Disclaimer: Nothing published by Money Morning should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investent advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication, or after the mailing of printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended by Money Morning should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Money Morning Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in