Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Investing in a Bubble Mania Stock Market Trending Towards Financial Crisis 2.0 CRASH! - 9th Sep 21
2.Tech Stocks Bubble Valuations 2000 vs 2021 - 25th Sep 21
3.Stock Market FOMO Going into Crash Season - 8th Oct 21
4.Stock Market FOMO Hits September Brick Wall - Evergrande China's Lehman's Moment - 22nd Sep 21
5.Crypto Bubble BURSTS! BTC, ETH, XRP CRASH! NiceHash Seizes Funds on Account Halting ALL Withdrawals! - 19th May 21
6.How to Protect Your Self From a Stock Market CRASH / Bear Market? - 14th Oct 21
7.AI Stocks Portfolio Buying and Selling Levels Going Into Market Correction - 11th Oct 21
8.Why Silver Price Could Crash by 20%! - 5th Oct 21
9.Powell: Inflation Might Not Be Transitory, After All - 3rd Oct 21
10.Global Stock Markets Topped 60 Days Before the US Stocks Peaked - 23rd Sep 21
Last 7 days
BREWING FINANCIAL CRISIS 2.0 Suggests RECESSION 2022 - 28th Jan 22
Financial Stocks Sector ETF XLF $37.50 Continues To Present Opportunities - 28th Jan 22
Stock Market Rushing Headlong - 28th Jan 22
The right way to play Climate Change Investing (not green energy stocks) - 28th Jan 22
Why Most Investors LOST Money by Investing in ARK FUNDS - 27th Jan 22
The “play-to-earn” trend taking the crypto world by storm - 27th Jan 22
Quantum AI Stocks Investing Priority - 26th Jan 22
Is Everyone Going To Be Right About This Stocks Bear Market?- 26th Jan 22
Stock Market Glass Half Empty or Half Full? - 26th Jan 22
Stock Market Quoted As Saying 'The Reports Of My Demise Are Greatly Exaggerated' - 26th Jan 22
The Synthetic Dividend Option To Generate Profits - 26th Jan 22
The Beginner's Guide to Credit Repair - 26th Jan 22
AI Tech Stocks State Going into the CRASH and Capitalising on the Metaverse - 25th Jan 22
Stock Market Relief Rally, Maybe? - 25th Jan 22
Why Gold’s Latest Rally Is Nothing to Get Excited About - 25th Jan 22
Gold Slides and Rebounds in 2022 - 25th Jan 22
Gold; a stellar picture - 25th Jan 22
CATHY WOOD ARK GARBAGE ARK Funds Heading for 90% STOCK CRASH! - 22nd Jan 22
Gold Is the Belle of the Ball. Will Its Dance Turn Bearish? - 22nd Jan 22
Best Neighborhoods to Buy Real Estate in San Diego - 22nd Jan 22
Stock Market January PANIC AI Tech Stocks Buying Opp - Trend Forecast 2022 - 21st Jan 21
How to Get Rich in the MetaVerse - 20th Jan 21
Should you Buy Payment Disruptor Stocks in 2022? - 20th Jan 21
2022 the Year of Smart devices, Electric Vehicles, and AI Startups - 20th Jan 21
Oil Markets More Animated by Geopolitics, Supply, and Demand - 20th Jan 21
WARNING - AI STOCK MARKET CRASH / BEAR SWITCH TRIGGERED! - 19th Jan 22
Fake It Till You Make It: Will Silver’s Motto Work on Gold? - 19th Jan 22
Crude Oil Smashing Stocks - 19th Jan 22
US Stagflation: The Global Risk of 2022 - 19th Jan 22
Stock Market Trend Forecast Early 2022 - Tech Growth Value Stocks Rotation - 18th Jan 22
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: Are We Setting Up For A 'Mini-Crash'? - 18th Jan 22
Mobile Sports Betting is on a rise: Here’s why - 18th Jan 22
Exponential AI Stocks Mega-trend - 17th Jan 22
THE NEXT BITCOIN - 17th Jan 22
Gold Price Predictions for 2022 - 17th Jan 22
How Do Debt Relief Services Work To Reduce The Amount You Owe? - 17th Jan 22
RIVIAN IPO Illustrates We are in the Mother of all Stock Market Bubbles - 16th Jan 22
All Market Eyes on Copper - 16th Jan 22
The US Dollar Had a Slip-Up, but Gold Turned a Blind Eye to It - 16th Jan 22
A Stock Market Top for the Ages - 16th Jan 22
FREETRADE - Stock Investing Platform, the Good, Bad and Ugly Review, Free Shares, Cancelled Orders - 15th Jan 22
WD 14tb My Book External Drive Unboxing, Testing and Benchmark Performance Amazon Buy Review - 15th Jan 22
Toyland Ferris Wheel Birthday Fun at Gulliver's Rother Valley UK Theme Park 2022 - 15th Jan 22
What You Should Know About a TailoredPay High Risk Merchant Account - 15th Jan 22

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

US Living Standards and Productivity

Economics / US Economy Jun 04, 2008 - 10:18 AM GMT

By: Gerard_Jackson

Economics Boring as this might seem to some of our rightwing pundits, we can get no where in economic debate without the application of theory. Many of the questions that are popping up these days are linked to the alleged connection between productivity, unemployment and inflation. There are no links here in the functional sense. In a free market unemployment will not rise even where productivity is falling.


Of course, in such a situation real incomes will also be falling. In other words, productivity is linked to real wages and not the volume of employment. So long as there is sufficient capital and land available there will always be jobs for those able and willing to work. The alleged link between productivity and inflation is paraded in the press as if it is an established economic fact while in reality it is an economic myth. The source of the myth is the erroneous belief that rising prices are inflationary or cause inflation.

Irrespective of what politicians and their economic advisors think, inflation is a monetary problem. There is no way you can get a continuous rise in general prices (assuming output is not falling) without a monetary expansion. What rising productivity tends to do, however, is offset the price effects of an expanding money supply by continuously lowering production costs. The result is then stable prices or a lower rate of 'price inflation'. The point is that in the absence of inflationary policy prices would be falling. Therefore any attempt to stabilize prices requires an inflationary policy.

Unfortunately the confusion gets even worse. I have frequently said that people never seem to learn from economic history. But this view should be qualified with the observation that we need a theory if we are to learn the correct lessons. This is rarely the case as is evidenced by what passes for economic debate in the media. Now it is still being argued by some that the Fed should have applied the monetary brakes in 2000 because the labour market was tightening and a tightening labour market — in their opinion always signals inflation. Others argued that America was on a new growth path and its rising productivity could easily accommodate rising wages without triggering inflation.

Who was right? Neither, is the answer. During the 1950s the German and British economies suffered very tight labour markets, but for very different reasons. Rapid growth in Germany's capital structure created severe labour shortage which had to be alleviated by introducing guest workers'. There was nothing inflationary there. Quite simply, capital accumulation outstripped the labour supply. In Britain, on the other hand, labour shortages were created by Keynesian policies that generated inflation and balance-of-payments problems followed by recurring credit crunches.

Clearly, a tight labour market in itself is never evidence of inflationary pressures, even where real wage rates are rising. So which is it for America, the Germany of the '50s or Britain? In my view it is Britain. Productivity is not the clue because it was also rising in Britain during the '50s. The clues are savings, money supply and the current account deficit. American savings fell, the money supply rapidly expanded and this in turn fuelled the growing current account deficit, and still is, by sucking in imports. The dollar depreciation is now reversing the flow of trade. However, the fall in the dollar was the result of the Fed's Keynesian policy of using interest rates to stimulate the economy*.

Like Britain of the '50s the American economy was driven by credit expansion instead of genuine savings as was the case with German economy. The real consequences of the Fed's reckless monetary policy were largely hidden because America's flexible labour markets allowed the economy considerable room for cost adjustments. This means that labour and capital tend to be more efficiently used than in countries like Germany and Japan. Combined with newly applied technologies this meant rising productivity.

Now by real consequences I don't just mean the misallocation of resources (what the Austrian School of economics calls malinvestments) but also the distinct possibility that Keynesian policies reshaped America's capital structure in a way that has kept living standards lower than they would otherwise have been.

By Gerard Jackson
BrookesNews.Com

Gerard Jackson is Brookes' economics editor.

Copyright © 2008 Gerard Jackson

Gerard Jackson Archive

© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in