Challenging the Mainstream Propaganda

Mike Shedlock has written an article on how GDP is distorted by the Bureau of Economic Analysis

Peter Schiff also covers the manipulation.

Apart from examining statistics, a simple look at some of the obvious realities brings the official numbers into question. When one considers that, while the official unemployment rate is supposedly 5%, when you use the methodology established in the late 1980s the real unemployment rate is approximately 23%.  This is confirmed by the declining  labour participation rate of 63%, the lowest in thirty seven years.  Real wages have seen no improvement, and are at the lowest level in thirty six years.  Food stamp usage is at a record high, with nearly half the US population dependent on some form of government handout.  This reality means that recovery is an illusion (at best), or a lie (at worst). Aldous Huxley, the writer and philosopher, said, “Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.” Jim Quinn quotes Huxley in his article “Should You Believe What They Tell You or What You See?”, which provides an excellent explanation of the many distortions and lies the mainstream media is asking us to believe.

Nowhere is the propaganda and distortion of economic reality more pervasive than in the negative media barrage against gold.  The biased commentary, rife with misrepresentations and purposeful omissions, is spun by the media almost on a daily basis. No other asset class or investment category is subject to this level of bias and misrepresentation.  Anyone who cares to look outside of the mainstream media propaganda will conclude that the drop in gold prices was clearly an orchestrated event, first in 2011 with a one day drop of 7.2%, and then in April 2013 for an 8.5% drop.  In the early morning hours of  January 6th, 2014, 12,000 gold contracts representing  $1.5 billion of naked short selling was forced onto the paper gold COMEX market. Without speculating about who did it or why, it should be obvious that no trader would sell that much gold into the market at one time, effectively minimizing their sales proceeds.  Dr. Paul Craig Roberts provides a detailed overview in “Rigged Gold Price Distorts Perception of Economic Reality”.

What most observers miss is the connection between the paper COMEX markets and the exchange-traded fund, GLD.  Unless you have read the original 2005 Prospectus and the Authorized Participant Agreement, it is impossible to understand how GLD, and in fact all ETFs, work. ETFs are not like open-end mutual funds with low management fees.  They are designed as tracking vehicles that use assets borrowed by Authorized Participants in exchange for ETF shares that are sold to the public, while the Authorized Participants keep all the proceeds of sale.  It is not about earning management fees. This article by David Ranson details some of the concerns with GLD.

When the gold price declines due to orchestrated naked shorting on the COMEX, redemption requests increase at the GLD. The Authorized Participants, likely the same entities that naked shorted gold on the COMEX exchange, redeem ETF shares for the borrowed physical gold. Either the gold is returned to the central banks from which it was borrowed, or it is sold to China via their sovereign wealth fund after being refined in Switzerland.

When China eventually announces that it now holds 5,000 to 6,000 tonnes of gold, the quants among us will have to figure out where that gold came from, because mainstream supply/demand statistics have already accounted for all the gold.  What mainstream statistics do not account for is leased gold that, by some estimates, has averaged over 1,500 tonnes per year, when mine supply has averaged 2,800 tonnes per year.  In addition, the US Geological Survey shows annual exports of about 700 tonnes over mine supply.  This amount of gold can only come from aboveground central bank holdings.  When China makes their announcement it will seriously undermine the credibility of Western central banks, and bring into question how much gold, and how many gold IOUs, they hold. In 2002 Frank Veneroso estimated that central banks only held about 16,000 tonnes vs the 32,000 tonnes they claimed. Recently Don Popescu provided a detailed analysis in “How Much Gold is on Loan Worldwide?”.

While many think that this manipulation of the gold price makes any investment in gold a losing proposition, the reality is that when the manipulation can no longer be sustained, gold will skyrocket as the public loses confidence in fiat currencies.  Paul de Sousa discusses this in a video presentation, “Why the Manipulation of Gold is the Greatest Investment Opportunity of this Century”.

What should investors do – believe the government statistics and mainstream propaganda?  Do they have the strength to challenge the propaganda and change their mindset, or will they simply follow the herd over the cliff at the next financial crisis?  Today, being without gold in a portfolio is like not having flood insurance when the hurricane is bearing down on you.  There are a host of events that could topple the world economy’s delicate balance: Geopolitical concerns; a bubble in the DOW, the strength of which is based solely on Federal Reserve policy, unsustainable stock buybacks and financial engineering; derivatives at the major banks that have grown by about 54% from $450 trillion in 2007 to $691 trillion by the second quarter of 2014. Of course, corporate debt around the world may be the trigger for the next financial crisis.  In “The Biggest Economic Story Going into 2015 is Not Oil,” Raul Ilargi Meijer discusses the corporate debt around the world, and the vulnerabilities it causes. 

With all of these vulnerabilities it goes without saying that, in order to reduce risk and improve returns, a diversified, balanced portfolio is the best way to preserve capital. Yet most portfolios are neither balanced nor diversified, and contain only three of the six asset classes of cash, stocks, bonds, real estate, commodities and precious metals.  Precious metals have the least correlation to financial assets such as stocks and bonds, and provide the greatest protection for the least amount of allocation.  Standard Deviation, the Sharpe Ratio and the Sortino Ratio are improved, and adding gold reduces the number of years with losses, and average loss. A traditional US portfolio of 60% stocks and 40% bonds would have yielded 10.5% over the last 43 years, with volatility of 12.8%.  A portfolio that included a 20% allocation to gold would have yielded 10.8% return, with a significantly reduced volatility of 9.2%.  In Canada, a traditional portfolio would have yielded 10.2% return, with 11.4% volatility, while one with 20% gold would have yielded 10.4% again a significantly lower volatility of 9.8%.

I publish a free weekly newsletter, the BullionBuzz, which summarizes some of the best articles available on the Internet, to help people understand economics and the underlying fundamentals for precious metals. For those interested in a more comprehensive understanding of gold, my book, $10,000  Gold – Why Gold’s Inevitable Rise Is the Investors Safe Haven, is available.