The JFK Conspiracy Theory Paradox

By: Robert_Singer

The assassination of the President of the United States on national television by the “lone” assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald—who according to authorities used an obsolete bolt-action WWI rifle that was not capable of firing bullets fast enough to wound John F. Kennedy—who is then assassinated the next day by another “lone” assassin, is so stupid that whoever is behind the assassination didn’t expect you to believe it.

Why would the conspirators, with the ability to plan and manage the JFK Assassination—involving the CIA, FBI, Secret Service, Police Departments and Coroners offices in two cities—come up with such a senseless plan riddled with mistakes, anomalies and discrepancies (Errant Data)? And then, to add a feather to your tin-foil hat, inexplicably allow that same Errant Data to be exposed in the media ad nauseam for everyone to question for the last 50 years.

• Does anyone have an explanation for why the conspirators would come up with such a convoluted plan, when a much simpler plan would accomplish the same goal? If the goal was to simply kill the president, why not have it done by a rogue agent from the CIA, FBI or Secret Service? Anyone of those could have quickly killed, JFK in the middle of the night, out of sight of any witnesses or, in those days, cameras.

• Does anyone have an explanation for why the conspirators would allow the mistakes, anomalies, discrepancies and the holes in the “official story” [Errant Data] to find it’s way into the official institutional record and then allow that same data to be aired on national television for all to question?

• Does anyone have an explanation for how trivial it would have been for the conspirators to change or falsify the alleged discrepancy or anomaly and avoid the stupid “mistakes?” Consider how easy it would be for these master criminals to just keep the Errant Data from being aired on national television, compared to the magnitude of the criminal acts they are alleged to have committed.

Put another way, isn’t it obvious that the JFK Assassination was a conspiracy to make you believe in a conspiracy:

The CIA killed JFK; the Mob killed JFK; the CIA and the Mob working together killed JFK; last but not least, Fidel Castro contracted with the KGB to have JFK killed.

All of the conspiracy theories, except mine, ha-ha (The 1961 JFK Speech that Kicked the American Dream into High Gear), are nonsense but that’s not the point.

The question that needs to be answered: Why was the JFK Assassination such a moronic plan?

Writer Michael Morrisey believes it was. In The Transparent Conspiracy he writes that the leaders [conspirators] “failed on purpose, and he coined the phrase “Mass Psychology of Partial Disclosure. Morrisey makes a compelling argument that there exists a conspiracy [to make us believe in a conspiracy] that involves the controlled media disclosing the errant data concerning the government’s culpability in atrocities such as the JFK, MLK and RFK assassinations. Morrisey believes in the existence of a shadow government, The Powers That Be (TPTB, a non-conspiracy acronym) that orchestrates these well-managed conspiracies/cover-ups. [1]

Morrissey believes TPTB are fully aware that a well-managed conspiracy will intimidate, demoralize and alienate the population of “useless eaters.” TPTB, he claims, want us in a state of fear and helplessness so we won’t rise up and upset their plans for a New World Order. But, I am not so sure. Revisionist history has shown that none of the revolutions were actually popular uprisings. [2]

What if the solution to the JFK Conspiracy Theory Paradox is negative energy?

Few would deny that a well-managed conspiracy/cover-up, when executed in such a stupid way on National TV, caused 50 years of controversy and negative energy.

Negative Energy, it turns out, is key to the solution to the Sandy Hook Conspiracy Paradox. The latest lone-nut massacre at Newtown, the worst school shooting in U.S. history, was allegedly staged by FEMA with crisis actors and made to look like a joint government-media operation false flag event.

It is inconceivable that Adam Lanza, a scrawny, socially-awkward 20-year-old, could have shot 20 innocent children (and six adults) at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in less than five minutes with an assault rifle [still in the trunk of his car] and handguns that his cheerful, self-reliant mother purchased for self-defense and target shooting. Further, Lanza could not have shot anyone anywhere on December 14 because, according to the Social Security Death index, he died the day before on December 13. [3] Again, the contradictions, outright lies, photographic evidence, lack of photographic evidence, inconsistencies, weird statements and strange behaviors appear to be endless fodder creating Negative Energy for those simply trying to discern the truth.

The Sandy Hook Conspiracy Paradox

A conspiracy involving the CIA, FBI, police departments in two cities, the coroners office, crisis actors, FEMA, Homeland Security, and the Newtown Bee is a Paradox because someone from the CIA, FBI, police departments in two cities, the coroners office, crisis actors, FEMA, Homeland Security, and the Newtown Bee would have come forward, and buzzed the real truth about what really happened.

They Live is the key to solving the paradox. They Live is a movie about a nameless, unemployed drifter referred to as “Nada” (Roddy Piper), who discovers a special pair of sunglasses that allows him to see an alternate reality of a bleak world populated by humanoid aliens with grotesque skull-like faces who thrive on negative energy.

What proof do I have that They Live is the key to solving the paradox?

Answer: Until April 5, 2013 the 1988 American science fiction-horror film, They Live, directed by John Carpenter could be streamed or downloaded from a number of websites. [3]

They Live (Full movie)" was in the playlist below created by Buddy Huggins:

By Robert Singer

http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2013/11/24/the-jfk-conspiracy-theory-paradox

Robert Singer is an Entrepreneur and the author of a forthcoming book on the Federal Reserve. His articles cover politics and the financial and environmental implications of our consumer society. 

© 2013 Copyright Robert Singer - All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.