Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Stock Market Rip the Face Off the Bears Rally! - 22nd Dec 24
STOP LOSSES - 22nd Dec 24
Fed Tests Gold Price Upleg - 22nd Dec 24
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: Why Do We Rely On News - 22nd Dec 24
Never Buy an IPO - 22nd Dec 24
THEY DON'T RING THE BELL AT THE CRPTO MARKET TOP! - 20th Dec 24
CEREBUS IPO NVIDIA KILLER? - 18th Dec 24
Nvidia Stock 5X to 30X - 18th Dec 24
LRCX Stock Split - 18th Dec 24
Stock Market Expected Trend Forecast - 18th Dec 24
Silver’s Evolving Market: Bright Prospects and Lingering Challenges - 18th Dec 24
Extreme Levels of Work-for-Gold Ratio - 18th Dec 24
Tesla $460, Bitcoin $107k, S&P 6080 - The Pump Continues! - 16th Dec 24
Stock Market Risk to the Upside! S&P 7000 Forecast 2025 - 15th Dec 24
Stock Market 2025 Mid Decade Year - 15th Dec 24
Sheffield Christmas Market 2024 Is a Building Site - 15th Dec 24
Got Copper or Gold Miners? Watch Out - 15th Dec 24
Republican vs Democrat Presidents and the Stock Market - 13th Dec 24
Stock Market Up 8 Out of First 9 months - 13th Dec 24
What Does a Strong Sept Mean for the Stock Market? - 13th Dec 24
Is Trump the Most Pro-Stock Market President Ever? - 13th Dec 24
Interest Rates, Unemployment and the SPX - 13th Dec 24
Fed Balance Sheet Continues To Decline - 13th Dec 24
Trump Stocks and Crypto Mania 2025 Incoming as Bitcoin Breaks Above $100k - 8th Dec 24
Gold Price Multiple Confirmations - Are You Ready? - 8th Dec 24
Gold Price Monster Upleg Lives - 8th Dec 24
Stock & Crypto Markets Going into December 2024 - 2nd Dec 24
US Presidential Election Year Stock Market Seasonal Trend - 29th Nov 24
Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past - 29th Nov 24
Gold After Trump Wins - 29th Nov 24
The AI Stocks, Housing, Inflation and Bitcoin Crypto Mega-trends - 27th Nov 24
Gold Price Ahead of the Thanksgiving Weekend - 27th Nov 24
Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast to June 2025 - 24th Nov 24
Stocks, Bitcoin and Crypto Markets Breaking Bad on Donald Trump Pump - 21st Nov 24
Gold Price To Re-Test $2,700 - 21st Nov 24
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: This Is My Strong Warning To You - 21st Nov 24
Financial Crisis 2025 - This is Going to Shock People! - 21st Nov 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Sure Fire Sign that Gas Prices are Heading Higher

Commodities / Gas - Petrol Apr 13, 2008 - 08:41 AM GMT

By: Keith_Fitz-Gerald

Commodities

The U.S. Energy Department said earlier this week that it expects average monthly gasoline prices to peak at $3.60 a gallon this spring, since the high prices will serve to curb demand.

For investors who are tired of feeling like they've been mugged every time they fill up at the corner gas station, this forecast had to nurture a feeling of relief - as well as a belief that pump prices will finally start to decline.


That may well happen in the short term (although even the Energy Department report said that before prices level off there could be interim price spikes that will take pump prices up over the $4 a gallon level).

But for the long haul, after looking at this prediction, we can't think of a more powerful indicator - or surefire sign - that prices at the gas pump are headed higher … much higher.

Here's why.

First and foremost, governments have had an unbelievable record of making bad decisions using bad data. And that record goes back centuries. Unfortunately, it's the taxpayer who usually ends up dealing with the consequences of these ill-advised government "predictions" after these civil-servant prognostications lead to such maladies as inflationary spirals, taxation cycles, recessions, monetary-policy miscues.

Why should this time be any different?

History suggests it won't be.

When it Doesn't Compute

Economic forecasters - especially those employed by the government - have a spectacular history of getting little, if anything, right. Not only that, but according to a study conducted by Societe Generale (OTC: SCGLY ), financial analysts lag reality badly and change their minds only when there is irrefutable proof they are wrong.

William A. Sherdan, author of the book, " The Fortune Sellers: The Big Business of Buying and Selling Predictions ," notes that "economic forecasters have routinely failed to foresee turning points in the economy, the coming of major recessions and the starts of recoveries."

As if that weren't bad enough, University of Chicago Professor Victor Zarnowitz - a leading global expert on business cycles and forecast evaluation - specifically analyzed the U.S. Federal Reserve, the President's Council on Economic Advisors and the Congressional Budget Office to assess the error rates associated with their predictions. His work found that 46 of 48 predictions made by this bunch missed major economic turning points including - most notably, the severe recession beginning in 1974.

Don't expect their marksmanship to get better anytime soon, either. Data we're familiar with suggests that conventional governmental forecasting is actually getting worse over time - not better.

Which makes us all the more suspicious of the $3.60 per gallon price point, particularly since it flies in the face of nearly everything we here at Money Morning know about global gasoline demand - which is accelerating dramatically even as long-term supplies are slowly being squeezed.

We'd love to say that's a surprise, but there's evidence of more government meddling here, too.

A Streetcar Named … Greed

Today, few investors remember the Great American Streetcar Scandal , but it helped set the fuel pinch we're feeling today in motion decades ago. In case you're not familiar with it, the scandal was a joint effort between General Motors Corp. ( GM ), Firestone Tire , Standard Oil Corp. and Phillips Petroleum ( COP ) to acquire streetcar systems nationwide … after which this anti-streetcar syndicate ripped out the municipal trolley systems in order to force the mass adoption of the automobile. This all took place between 1936 and 1950.

Long story short, GM was fined a whopping $5,000 and its executives charged $1 each for conspiracy, but the damage was done. Throw in the Interstate Highway System - which came into existence at about the same time, not coincidentally - and one can easily imagine the links between higher demand and bad decision making, even if only in retrospect.

Which brings us back to the present day…

Gasoline prices are indirectly tied to oil and, as such, the $3.60 line the government drew in the sand stands directly in the face of everything we know about " peak oil " and global demand.

Originally proposed by Shell Oil geophysicist M. King Hubbert in the 1950s, the concept of peak oil refers to the point in time when the maximum rate of petroleum production is reached, after which this production rate endures an irreversible decline.

Originally, it was a highly controversial theory. But in an era where we're burning reserves four times faster than they're being replaced by new discoveries, it's increasingly being accepted as a reality. The sharper experts are no longer asking "if" we're going to run out of oil; now they're trying to predict "when."

It's certainly a vexing question, and we don't pretend to know the answer.

But we do know this: It's likely to be sooner than the world thinks, if for no other reason than global demand is accelerating at a record pace at a time when worldwide inventories are generally declining.

That's why investors can expect more days like Wednesday, when the disclosure that U.S. oil inventories were "lower than expected" torpedoed U.S. stock prices and sent oil futures soaring to a new intraday record of $112.21 a barrel.

The latest Energy Information Administration data suggests that world wide consumption will increase 37% by 2030, which puts demand at staggering 118 million barrels a day. For some perspective: Daily oil consumption in 2006 was 86 million barrels.

Not surprisingly, the lion's share of new demand is coming from the developing world, with China and India leading the way. China, which imports 55% of its oil, is on track to double consumption within 10 years, while India is expected to triple its oil usage in the same period to more than 5 million barrels a day.

Where this gets really interesting is that any number of factors that would reduce supply don't appear to be included in any of the generally accepted equations. For instance:

  • The growth rates in both China and India alone are fast enough and the countries large enough that they could potentially negate any savings we see in this country from higher prices.
  • Oil-exporting countries are becoming increasingly likely to "hold back" oil from the international export markets, opting to keep it at home literally to fuel domestic growth.
  • Several major oil suppliers - most notably Saudi Arabia - may not be accurately reporting their reserve capacity.

Which brings us full circle.

Why I Believe Oil Will Reach $187 a Barrel

I've been projecting energy prices for well over a decade. And I've always made sure to include all the potential catalysts in my forecasts. That's why my projections have been on the mark.

Back in early 2002, when oil was trading at less than $20 a barrel, I conservatively predicted that oil prices would reach $100 a barrel within 10 years. As we now know, it happened in a shorter period than that.

Where do we go from here?

Late last year, when oil was trading in the range of $90 a barrel, I first publicly predicted that crude would trade as high as $187 a barrel in the next three years . In the middle of March, just days after I reiterated that prediction and provided some potential related investment opportunities in an edition of Money Morning , Wall Street giant Goldman Sachs Group Inc. ( GS ) issued a report predicting crude oil prices would reach $175 in the next few years.

Real pricing changes and the altered behavior that flows out of such stressful stretches can only take place when prices are high and when shortages become apparent. Without the benefit of all the information uncovered by such a volatile environment, forecasting can be a fool's game.

As I've demonstrated, whenever I've made price projections, I've always made sure to factor in as many variables as possible. But it's clear to me that the Energy Department did not do the same.

Therefore, as much as we'd love to believe that gasoline prices will stop their incredible ascent at $3.60 a gallon this spring, we can't. Not only does the government's price point seem to be little more than another guess in a long line of baseless predictions, it's even contradicted by the saga that's unfolding on the global economic stage.

Absent the introduction of proven alternatives to gasoline, we're entering an era in which a pump price of $3.60 a gallon is going to be looked back on as a bargain.

And while it's going to be a painful period, investors who view this as an opportunity may well find ways to take the sting out of escalating energy prices. Check out these Money Morning investment research reports:

News and Related Story Links:

By Keith Fitz-Gerald
Investment Director
Money Morning/The Money Map Report

©2008 Monument Street Publishing. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), of content from this website, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Monument Street Publishing. 105 West Monument Street, Baltimore MD 21201, Email: customerservice@moneymorning.com

Disclaimer: Nothing published by Money Morning should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication, or 72 hours after the mailing of printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended by Money Morning should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Keith Fitz-Gerald Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in