Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Trump or Harris - Who Wins US Presidential Election 2024 Forecast Prediction - 5th Nov 24
Stock Market Brief in Count Down to US Election Result 2024 - 3rd Nov 24
Gold Stocks’ Winter Rally 2024 - 3rd Nov 24
Why Countdown to U.S. Recession is Underway - 3rd Nov 24
Stock Market Trend Forecast to Jan 2025 - 2nd Nov 24
President Donald PUMP Forecast to Win US Presidential Election 2024 - 1st Nov 24
At These Levels, Buying Silver Is Like Getting It At $5 In 2003 - 28th Oct 24
Nvidia Numero Uno Selling Shovels in the AI Gold Rush - 28th Oct 24
The Future of Online Casinos - 28th Oct 24
Panic in the Air As Stock Market Correction Delivers Deep Opps in AI Tech Stocks - 27th Oct 24
Stocks, Bitcoin, Crypto's Counting Down to President Donald Pump! - 27th Oct 24
UK Budget 2024 - What to do Before 30th Oct - Pensions and ISA's - 27th Oct 24
7 Days of Crypto Opportunities Starts NOW - 27th Oct 24
The Power Law in Venture Capital: How Visionary Investors Like Yuri Milner Have Shaped the Future - 27th Oct 24
This Points To Significantly Higher Silver Prices - 27th Oct 24
US House Prices Trend Forecast 2024 to 2026 - 11th Oct 24
US Housing Market Analysis - Immigration Drives House Prices Higher - 30th Sep 24
Stock Market October Correction - 30th Sep 24
The Folly of Tariffs and Trade Wars - 30th Sep 24
Gold: 5 principles to help you stay ahead of price turns - 30th Sep 24
The Everything Rally will Spark multi year Bull Market - 30th Sep 24
US FIXED MORTGAGES LIMITING SUPPLY - 23rd Sep 24
US Housing Market Free Equity - 23rd Sep 24
US Rate Cut FOMO In Stock Market Correction Window - 22nd Sep 24
US State Demographics - 22nd Sep 24
Gold and Silver Shine as the Fed Cuts Rates: What’s Next? - 22nd Sep 24
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks:Nothing Can Topple This Market - 22nd Sep 24
US Population Growth Rate - 17th Sep 24
Are Stocks Overheating? - 17th Sep 24
Sentiment Speaks: Silver Is At A Major Turning Point - 17th Sep 24
If The Stock Market Turn Quickly, How Bad Can Things Get? - 17th Sep 24
IMMIGRATION DRIVES HOUSE PRICES HIGHER - 12th Sep 24
Global Debt Bubble - 12th Sep 24
Gold’s Outlook CPI Data - 12th Sep 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Is the Fed Guilty of Treason?

Politics / Central Banks Mar 22, 2013 - 06:09 AM GMT

By: Brian_Bloom

Politics

An important  issue that the gold lobby has raised  in the past (regarding the application of Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution), gave rise to a court decision that any complainant who wished to challenge the relationship of the Fed and the US Government had to have locus standi in judicio. Apparently, the reason for this was that, because of the fact that Congress must approve borrowing limits of the Federal Government, and because of the double sided bookkeeping entry that clearly links new treasury bond issuance with money creation, it was (at that time) a fact that Congress was ultimately in control of the country’s  money supply. Theoretically, if Congress had refused to raise the Sovereign borrowing limit then that would have put a stop to the Fed’s money creation.  


As I understand it, that is why the courts threw out the complaints, because only a shareholder in the Fed would have locus standi to question any alleged abuse of the relationship between the two parties (Federal Government and Federal Reserve). i.e. There was no breach of the Constitution.

Thinking about it now, I suspect that the ground has shifted. From memory, TARP was approved by Congress and therefore it was still constitutionally lawful. However, the Fed’s decision (without Congressional approval) to increase its balance sheet post-TARP is, arguably, a decision to increase the money supply of the country that is in breach of Article 1, Sec 8.  In particular, the decision to buy mortgage backed securities would need Congressional approval.  In general, the “repurchase” of an existing treasury bond may also be prohibited but this is a grey area. As I understand the law, under circumstances of the Fed’s unilateral decision to increase its balance sheet in this manner, one would not need to have locus standi to lodge a complaint. i.e. any citizen could lodge a complaint,  but I’m not sure what the charges might be.  An “act of treason” might be one of them.

Of course, Congress might pass an Act retrospectively giving the Fed permission to buy these various securities but  I’m uncertain of the legalities of this. It would be a question of constitutional law whether a historical act of treason can be “unwound” by a simple majority of Congress given that the Constitution can only be modified by a 2/3 majority of both houses and a 2/3 majority of all States. If the Constitution, once breached, can be un-breached at the stroke of a pen, then what is its value?  I suppose a “Presidential Pardon” would be all that would be necessary to save Dr Bernanke’s neck, but what about an act of treason by the Fed as an organisation? What about the Boards of Directors of the various Fed shareholder banks?

So here’s a thought: If patriotic, bi-partisan politicians genuinely want to bring “order” out of the “chaos” that is now emerging as Ben Bernanke rides into the sunset with six guns blazing trying to flood the  markets with cash and keep interest rates low at the same time, they could introduce a law that PROHIBITS retrospective approval of the Federal Reserve’s actions. In that way, Dr Bernanke would have no future wriggle room to work outside the supervision of Congress. I’m sure there are many inside both Congress and the Senate who are questioning the wisdom of injecting $85 billion fresh cash into the economy every month.  Although Dr Bernanke certainly doesn’t have unanimity even within his own Board,  he seems to be managing this by force of his personality and his position as Chairman. But let’s understand this: Effectively, as things stand, one man is deciding monetary policy for the entire country and that is certainly not mandated by the Constitution. It would be a very brave President who would veto a law that prohibits a retrospective law of this nature that has been passed by both houses – especially a President who is supposedly an expert in Constitutional Law.

Maybe this idea could be aired by people who are better qualified than I am – which is why I am circularising all of you. It’s a very fine point of law but, at face value, it might be the thin end of the wedge that could bring the loose-cannon decision makers under control. Would there be pain? Of course there would!  But that’s life, and life has a way of carrying on. And we certainly cannot carry on in this manner. Just stop and think about the implications of what happened in Cyprus over the past week end.

Brian Bloom

Author, Beyond Neanderthal and The Last Finesse

www.beyondneanderthal.com

Beyond Neanderthal and The Last Finesse are now available to purchase in e-book format, at under US$10 a copy, via almost 60 web based book retailers across the globe. In addition to Kindle, the entertaining, easy-to-read fact based adventure novels may also be downloaded on Kindle for PC, iPhone, iPod Touch, Blackberry, Nook, iPad and Adobe Digital Editions. Together, these two books offer a holistic right brain/left brain view of the current human condition, and of possibilities for a more positive future for humanity.

Copyright © 2013 Brian Bloom - All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Brian Bloom Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in