Interest Rate Cuts WIll fail to Build Trust Between Financial Institutions
Interest-Rates / Credit Crisis 2008 Jan 31, 2008 - 01:39 AM GMT
A little more than a week ago a lone trader was able to rack up 4.9 billion euros in losses from trading in ‘plain vanilla' DAX futures. At the time of the discovery by SocGen officials, the losses were less than 2 billion euros. When the futures were sold off, the market crashed setting off a worldwide chain reaction which climaxed in the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates by 75 basis points.
The question on my mind is why the futures had to be sold off on the market immediately? SocGen notified the Governor of the Bank of France and the head of France 's AMF stock market when the rogue trades were discovered. The officials and counterparties could have worked together to alleviate the situation as the Federal Reserve did in the LTCM and Amaranth hedge fund situations. In each case, the Federal Reserve worked with counterparties to stem what would have been a major financial crisis in the markets.
When LTCM and Amaranth each collapsed the markets were under a much firmer financial footing but the markets would have had tremendous difficulty absorbing the positions responsible for the collapse. At the present time, counterparties in the marketplace are having difficulties working with one another which is causing extreme difficulties in more exotic derivative markets, not the more mature and developed ‘vanilla' futures markets.
Trust will not return between counterparties with rate cuts. Trust will only come with time and assurances that the values of the underlying assets are solid and transparent. In this instance, if there was trust between counterparties significant damage to the markets could have been alleviated.
One has to wonder what the ECB, who has so far been very transparent in their messages to the markets, was doing while the crisis raged on at SocGen. Did they give tacit approval to the selloff? Where was the European response? When did they notify the US Federal Reserve, before or after the cut? Why did they allow the Federal Reserve to respond to a European problem?
By David Urban
http://blog.myspace.com/global112
Communications are intended solely for informational purposes. Statements made should not be construed as an endorsement, either expressed or implied. This blog and the author is not responsible for typographic errors or other inaccuracies in the content. We believe the information contained herein to be accurate and reliable. However, errors may occasionally occur. Therefore, all information and materials are provided "AS IS" without any warranty of any kind. Past results are not indicative of future results.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN THE STOCK, BOND, AND DERIVATIVE MARKETS. WHEN CONSIDERING ANY TYPE OF INVESTMENT, INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS, YOU SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS: OFTEN ENGAGE IN LEVERAGING AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES THAT MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS, CAN BE ILLIQUID, ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PERIODIC PRICING OR VALUATION INFORMATION TO INVESTORS, MAY INVOLVE COMPLEX TAX STRUCTURES AND DELAYS IN DISTRIBUTING IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION, ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER.
Before making any type of investment, one should consult with an investment professional to consider whether the investment is appropriate for the individuals risk profile.
David Urban Archive |
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.