Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Stocks, Bitcoin and Crypto Markets Breaking Bad on Donald Trump Pump - 21st Nov 24
Gold Price To Re-Test $2,700 - 21st Nov 24
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: This Is My Strong Warning To You - 21st Nov 24
Financial Crisis 2025 - This is Going to Shock People! - 21st Nov 24
Dubai Deluge - AI Tech Stocks Earnings Correction Opportunities - 18th Nov 24
Why President Trump Has NO Real Power - Deep State Military Industrial Complex - 8th Nov 24
Social Grant Increases and Serge Belamant Amid South Africa's New Political Landscape - 8th Nov 24
Is Forex Worth It? - 8th Nov 24
Nvidia Numero Uno in Count Down to President Donald Pump Election Victory - 5th Nov 24
Trump or Harris - Who Wins US Presidential Election 2024 Forecast Prediction - 5th Nov 24
Stock Market Brief in Count Down to US Election Result 2024 - 3rd Nov 24
Gold Stocks’ Winter Rally 2024 - 3rd Nov 24
Why Countdown to U.S. Recession is Underway - 3rd Nov 24
Stock Market Trend Forecast to Jan 2025 - 2nd Nov 24
President Donald PUMP Forecast to Win US Presidential Election 2024 - 1st Nov 24
At These Levels, Buying Silver Is Like Getting It At $5 In 2003 - 28th Oct 24
Nvidia Numero Uno Selling Shovels in the AI Gold Rush - 28th Oct 24
The Future of Online Casinos - 28th Oct 24
Panic in the Air As Stock Market Correction Delivers Deep Opps in AI Tech Stocks - 27th Oct 24
Stocks, Bitcoin, Crypto's Counting Down to President Donald Pump! - 27th Oct 24
UK Budget 2024 - What to do Before 30th Oct - Pensions and ISA's - 27th Oct 24
7 Days of Crypto Opportunities Starts NOW - 27th Oct 24
The Power Law in Venture Capital: How Visionary Investors Like Yuri Milner Have Shaped the Future - 27th Oct 24
This Points To Significantly Higher Silver Prices - 27th Oct 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

The Foolish Policy of Exporting Natural Gas

Politics / Natural Gas Apr 18, 2012 - 08:20 AM GMT

By: BATR

Politics

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleThe lack of a government policy that promotes domestic energy independence in the United States is a tragic consequence of playing politics for decades. The current rage is the natural gas boom that offers the alternative of producing a plentiful and inexpensive source of fuel. Economic prosperity rests upon cheap and reliable power and natural gas offers the best option.


The pricing of natural gas is regional and quite different from trading crude oil. Loren Steffy reports in the Houston Chronicle, "A surge in drilling for gas from shale formations around the U.S. has generated a glut of natural gas, pushing prices below $2 per million British thermal units."Forbes set out the basic dilemma that conflict with the true long-term internal energy benefit, from the use of our own resources, for the national interest.

"The U.S. government may soon decide on the request from Cheniere Energy to build an LNG export terminal that allows the company to liquefy natural gas and export to international markets, where prices are much higher than in America.

Natural gas exports could allow companies to take advantage of higher gas prices in Asian and European markets and ease the supply glut in the U.S."

Hello, just think about this corporatist lunacy that wants to grab up our own natural gas supplies at rock bottom price, so that companies can export a crucial national resource, to foreign markets that are willing to pay $10.00 and above, merely for the enrichment of some business enterprise. An American government policy that allows for this legalized theft is absurd.

The true underlying basis for establishing a supply and demand floor for a national gas source is to transition gasoline and diesel vehicles to burn natural gas. This obvious assessment received major push back because it disrupts the oil monopoly for fueling cars, buses and trucks.

Since the cost of natural gas has averaged above $6.00 per BTU for the last decade, the cost for conversion should anticipate a much higher price when the gas fracking rage comes down to reality. The idea that insufficient regulated policing of a dangerous process of chemical and water contamination is justified in order to export natural gas is shameful.

As long as shortsighted politicians and insatiable companies seek to misuse our internal resources for international greed, the country will suffer another round of energy dependency.

Note the significance from the Executive Order: Feds To Take Control of Domestic Natural Gas Production.

"The President’s order establishes an "Interagency Working Group" to be composed of deputy level or higher representatives from federal agencies that include the Defense Department, Transportation, Agriculture, Health and Human Services, Energy, Homeland Security, and the Environmental Protection Agency.

Moreover, because a key stated purpose of the Executive Order is to ensure long-term supplies, the President’s decree gives the federal government the ability to shut down gas production operations as they see fit, potentially leading to government price fixing and centralized control of an essential natural energy resource."

Wrapped in the guise of ensuing domestic natural gas supplies is the actual drive behind the fracking rage. Exporting Natural Gas Would Be Very Profitable For North American E&P Companies admits the unmistakable motivation that confirms the previous report.

"The best way to alleviate the problem of natural gas oversupply in North America is to increase its export. The most economical way to export natural gas is to liquefy it; this type of natural gas is called LNG. In its liquid state natural gas takes up 1/600 of its normal volume, making it ideal for export. There are currently over 100 production, export and storage facilities in the U.S. Many companies have submitted applications with the U.S. Department of Energy for LNG export terminals, such as BG and Sempra (SRE). The nation's largest exporter of LNG is Cheniere Energy (CQP). Last year, Cheniere's Sabine Pass terminal was the first export terminal project in more than 40 years to get authorization from the U.S. Department of Energy to export natural gas to major importing countries."

An executive order does not make a sound energy policy. The Energy Department continues its pattern of stripping domestic independence production. The fact that our natural resources are squandered for export will never develop a marketplace where inexpensive domestic usage becomes the driving fuel behind a viable national transportation system.

How can anyone reasonably expect that an agency established by President Jimmy Carter will do any better? What came from the shale oil or coal conversion initiatives of the late 1970’s? Continuous government incompetence and misguided export direction will never restore economic affluence on the home front.

Natural gas is a superior fuel resource that needs to benefit our own consumers. As long as national policy ignores this goal, our interests will continually be shipped overseas.

The growth trend for using natural gas worldwide is clearly advancing. The Obama administration wants to eliminate electric generation from coal. Natural gas will become the energy of choice for utilities. Is it not time to establish a long-term market ceiling on electric costs?

Pursuing and encouraging a LNG sell abroad strategy just rewards the gas drillers and exporters. The very real risks and environmental fallout from unsafe fracking methods are a bad trade off when the natural gas ultimately goes for foreign use.

As gas exploration advances and production increases, the opportunity is historic to lower our domestic fuel costs. This is no time for allowing the exporters to exploit the natural gas resource of America.

James Hall – April 18, 2012

Discuss or comment about this essay on the BATR Forum

http://www.batr.org

"Many seek to become a Syndicated Columnist, while the few strive to be a Vindicated Publisher"

© 2012 Copyright BATR - All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.


© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Comments

Mightycline
19 Apr 12, 19:01
$6.00 per BTU

Well, so much for error free writing. The $6.00 per BTU written below the second graph must really mean $6.00 per Therm, right? Once you err, the whole article gets off track. What you don't know, hurts you. The whole idea of government intervention on CNG exporting suggests to me a democrat is writing this article. There is no strategic value to CNG if we are completely dependent on oil for gasoline for our automobiles. Pass more legislation to ban exporting CNG? You must be planning ahead to when the Democrats are in power again. Like never. However, if they do get back in power, then it is all over for any need of gasoline, right? Right.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in