Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Stocks, Bitcoin and Crypto Markets Breaking Bad on Donald Trump Pump - 21st Nov 24
Gold Price To Re-Test $2,700 - 21st Nov 24
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: This Is My Strong Warning To You - 21st Nov 24
Financial Crisis 2025 - This is Going to Shock People! - 21st Nov 24
Dubai Deluge - AI Tech Stocks Earnings Correction Opportunities - 18th Nov 24
Why President Trump Has NO Real Power - Deep State Military Industrial Complex - 8th Nov 24
Social Grant Increases and Serge Belamant Amid South Africa's New Political Landscape - 8th Nov 24
Is Forex Worth It? - 8th Nov 24
Nvidia Numero Uno in Count Down to President Donald Pump Election Victory - 5th Nov 24
Trump or Harris - Who Wins US Presidential Election 2024 Forecast Prediction - 5th Nov 24
Stock Market Brief in Count Down to US Election Result 2024 - 3rd Nov 24
Gold Stocks’ Winter Rally 2024 - 3rd Nov 24
Why Countdown to U.S. Recession is Underway - 3rd Nov 24
Stock Market Trend Forecast to Jan 2025 - 2nd Nov 24
President Donald PUMP Forecast to Win US Presidential Election 2024 - 1st Nov 24
At These Levels, Buying Silver Is Like Getting It At $5 In 2003 - 28th Oct 24
Nvidia Numero Uno Selling Shovels in the AI Gold Rush - 28th Oct 24
The Future of Online Casinos - 28th Oct 24
Panic in the Air As Stock Market Correction Delivers Deep Opps in AI Tech Stocks - 27th Oct 24
Stocks, Bitcoin, Crypto's Counting Down to President Donald Pump! - 27th Oct 24
UK Budget 2024 - What to do Before 30th Oct - Pensions and ISA's - 27th Oct 24
7 Days of Crypto Opportunities Starts NOW - 27th Oct 24
The Power Law in Venture Capital: How Visionary Investors Like Yuri Milner Have Shaped the Future - 27th Oct 24
This Points To Significantly Higher Silver Prices - 27th Oct 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

US Treasury Yield BubbleomiX Forecast: 10 Year Bonds Still Targeting 3%

Interest-Rates / US Bonds Mar 18, 2011 - 07:55 AM GMT

By: Andrew_Butter

Interest-Rates

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleThree months ago I wrote a piece saying that the 10-Year was heading for 3% by 20th February. http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article25128.html

 I got a note from someone who is right more often than me saying he had it pegged at 3.8% . I’ll call that a draw although I noticed I made a mistake on the timing, what I really meant was April 20th; I’ll put that down to dyslexia.


The logic there was starting in August the market started to front-run the Fed creating a mini-bubble (the price of a bond is the reciprocal of the yield), then there was a mini-bust. If the Immutable Laws of BubbleomiX apply, then the “fundamental” in such circumstances is the square-root of the peak multiplied by the trough, which gets you to about 3%, Q.E.D.

 I must say I was pretty surprised to hear that PIMCO had dumped all their Treasuries in January and February, by my reckoning they timed the bottom of the market almost to perfection, George Brown would have been proud.

There are a number of wonderful economic theories for what drives the price of US Treasuries which I suspect have their roots in the wonderful valuations that were assigned to all those Toxic Assets that in the event, sadly didn’t quite obey what passes for the Immutable Laws of  Economics.

Apparently, according to those laws what drives the price (yield) is “expectations” of inflation and/or nominal GDP growth. As with most wonderful laws of economics, that’s wonderful, except for one small detail, they don’t work.

Leaving aside the fact that the economists can’t agree how to measure inflation, try plotting twenty or thirty years  “forward” CPI or Nominal GDP (i.e. what actually happened) against US Treasury yields (on the assumption that “expectations” can predict the future – which is a pretty silly assumption if you are talking economics), and you get a pretty lousy correlation. But of course economists don’t care about lousy correlations, when reality contradicts their pre-conceived ideas.

You get a better correlation if you plot the trailing average, this is a four-year-trailing average of Nominal GDP growth, plotted against yield going back to 1980:

That analysis says that Nominal GDP in the past explains 83% to 85% of changes in US Treasury yields. You could probably push that up to about 95% if you could be bothered to do multivariate analysis, but rough numbers I reckon 83% is “good enough for government work”.

What that also says is that the economic sins of the past, stay with you until what the Austrians call the “mal-investments” get washed out of the system, regardless of how hard the politicians try and “start with a clean sheet” to paper-over the extend and pretend.

So that analysis says the “fundamental” (that’s what International Valuation Standards calls “Other-Than-Market-Value”), is a tad over 3% for the 10-Year right now (and that’s what it’s going to be for the next year at least even if nominal GDP grows 5% a year from here on in).

That’s pretty consistent with the “Square-Root-of “Top”-multiplied-by-“Bottom”  line of reasoning, which for me gives an added degree of confidence since those two ways of getting to the same answer are completely independent.

Notice also the “best-fit” is an “S” curve, which makes sense since even if nominal GDP is negative, people are going to always ask for some sort of return. Equally when inflation is raging (the main reason nominal GDP growth gets up to 16% or so), there is a limit on how much people will pay out in interest on a “safe bet”.

So “matey” – is the bet’s still on? How about going to ”Double or Quits?”

By Andrew Butter

Twenty years doing market analysis and valuations for investors in the Middle East, USA, and Europe; currently writing a book about BubbleOmics. Andrew Butter is managing partner of ABMC, an investment advisory firm, based in Dubai ( hbutter@eim.ae ), that he setup in 1999, and is has been involved advising on large scale real estate investments, mainly in Dubai.

© 2011 Copyright Andrew Butter- All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Andrew Butter Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Comments

Rich
02 Jun 11, 13:13
a month late

Andrew,

Your call was about a month off (again) ... but it was the right call. Congrats!


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in