Most Popular
1. Banking Crisis is Stocks Bull Market Buying Opportunity - Nadeem_Walayat
2.The Crypto Signal for the Precious Metals Market - P_Radomski_CFA
3. One Possible Outcome to a New World Order - Raymond_Matison
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
5. Apple AAPL Stock Trend and Earnings Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
6.AI, Stocks, and Gold Stocks – Connected After All - P_Radomski_CFA
7.Stock Market CHEAT SHEET - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.US Debt Ceiling Crisis Smoke and Mirrors Circus - Nadeem_Walayat
9.Silver Price May Explode - Avi_Gilburt
10.More US Banks Could Collapse -- A Lot More- EWI
Last 7 days
Stock Market Volatility (VIX) - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Investor Sentiment - 25th Mar 24
The Federal Reserve Didn't Do Anything But It Had Plenty to Say - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Breadth - 24th Mar 24
Stock Market Margin Debt Indicator - 24th Mar 24
It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - 24th Mar 24
Stocks: What to Make of All This Insider Selling- 24th Mar 24
Money Supply Continues To Fall, Economy Worsens – Investors Don’t Care - 24th Mar 24
Get an Edge in the Crypto Market with Order Flow - 24th Mar 24
US Presidential Election Cycle and Recessions - 18th Mar 24
US Recession Already Happened in 2022! - 18th Mar 24
AI can now remember everything you say - 18th Mar 24
Bitcoin Crypto Mania 2024 - MicroStrategy MSTR Blow off Top! - 14th Mar 24
Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - 11th Mar 24
Gold and the Long-Term Inflation Cycle - 11th Mar 24
Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - 11th Mar 24
Two Reasons The Fed Manipulates Interest Rates - 11th Mar 24
US Dollar Trend 2024 - 9th Mar 2024
The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - 9th Mar 2024
Investors Don’t Believe the Gold Rally, Still Prefer General Stocks - 9th Mar 2024
Paper Gold Vs. Real Gold: It's Important to Know the Difference - 9th Mar 2024
Stocks: What This "Record Extreme" Indicator May Be Signaling - 9th Mar 2024
My 3 Favorite Trade Setups - Elliott Wave Course - 9th Mar 2024
Bitcoin Crypto Bubble Mania! - 4th Mar 2024
US Interest Rates - When WIll the Fed Pivot - 1st Mar 2024
S&P Stock Market Real Earnings Yield - 29th Feb 2024
US Unemployment is a Fake Statistic - 29th Feb 2024
U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - 29th Feb 2024
What a Breakdown in Silver Mining Stocks! What an Opportunity! - 29th Feb 2024
Why AI will Soon become SA - Synthetic Intelligence - The Machine Learning Megatrend - 29th Feb 2024
Keep Calm and Carry on Buying Quantum AI Tech Stocks - 19th Feb 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

U.N. Votes to Do a Kosovo in Libya, Be Fearful When Politicians Dream of Rambo

Politics / Middle East Mar 18, 2011 - 07:48 AM GMT

By: Andrew_Butter

Politics

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleJust for the record I’m not “anti-war”, my uncle was awarded a Military Cross for fighting Hitler, and I’m proud of that. But sometimes I wonder was his sacrifice worth it?

The good news I suppose is that The U.N. has managed to agree on something that might have a minimal impact on the propensity of despots with guns, money and backing from a big power, to terrorise their own people; should we now expect that someday soon:


>>USA, Saudi Arabia and Israel will sign up to the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court?

>>Will they sign Protocol One of the 1977 Geneva Convention? That’s the one where you commit to safeguard the safety of civilians in military conflicts like the Americans manifestly did not do in Iraq, and the Israelis manifestly do not do when they “punish” Palestinian civilians. According to the Lancet more than 500,000 Iraqi civilians died as a result of the US invasion of Iraq, the civilian casualties in Libya are chicken-feed next to that.

>>Will Tony Blair who participated in that slaughter, and was the leader of a country that did actually sign Protocol One of the 1977 Geneva Convention, be prosecuted for crimes against humanity under the terms of that protocol?

>>Will the Palestinians who were “ethnically cleansed” be allowed to go home, and be afforded basic human rights?

>>Will the brave British and American individuals involved in authorizing and conducting torture of suspected Al Qaeda “operatives”, be prosecuted?

>>Will what the Sydney Herald calls the “US-backed Sunni regime” in Bahrain and the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia get the same treatment?

>>Will the U.N. censure Russia for their human rights abuses in Cheznya?

>>Will the “Brave Brits” go up against the strong-man Mugabe in Zimbabwe, who has reneged on every commitment he made to UK when they ran away with their tails between their legs, and who has committed a hundred-times more human-rights abuses than Gaddafi?

Not likely, but in any case we should be thankful for small mercies.

At least the U.N. did not hand over carte-blanche to the Anglo-American alliance, to use Donald Rumsfeld’s favourite phrase, to “bomb Libya back into the Stone Ages”.

As they did in Kosovo and Afghanistan; targeting anything that could remotely be considered as having “military significance”; such as Red-Cross warehouses, bridges, electricity power plants, water supply systems, petrol installations, and even hospitals. As if civilians in a war-zone deprived of those amenities aren’t likely to end up as “collateral damage”.

Isn’t it funny how politicians losing popularity at home can’t resist re-focusing their efforts on some great enterprise a long-way-away that can be used to paper-over their own incompetence. When politicians start to play Rambo, well someone is going to get hurt.

The “solution” agreed in the U.N. is a typical politician’s compromise, a Green-Light for bombing but no ground troops. Ah the language of the brave, how easy it is to stand-off and bomb without the pain of committing ground troops.

If you put a gun against the head of a six year old child and pull the trigger, that’s a crime against humanity. But according to the rules of engagement of the New World Order, if you blow the same child up by dropping a bomb from 10,000 feet, that’s just “collateral damage”.

Oh well, just let the protagonists use AK-47’s which were the weapon of choice that the Serbians used when the brave Dutch “peacekeepers” handed over Muslims to be “processed” in Kosovo, and then “sensibly” retreated to their luxury barracks to watch the fun on CNN. Or let them use knives and hatchets as in Rwanda, where the U.N. and the world stood-by crying crocodile tears. 

Everyone knows that the only thing that can sort out Libya would be ground forces and a U.N. managed interim government. But as Angela Merkel wisely pointed out, if you do that in Libya, why not do it in Israel, Bahrain, Iran, the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Zimbabwe…etc?

Why pick on Libya?

Well first of all it’s an easy target, Gaddafi has a pretty useless air-force (in case it was used against him), and a tank sitting out in the desert is an easy target once you have control of the sky, which will be achieved in about five minutes.

More important, USA, UK and French oil companies all signed up to some great concessions in Libya over the past few years, particularly UK which traded the Lockerbie bomber for “special favours” for BP.  Funny how those governments had no problem with what Gaddafi had been doing for years, when they signed those deals, but of course now they see an opportunity to “re-negotiate”.

What will happen next is that probably the war will degenerate into street fighting and sieges, and protracted, long-drawn out suffering for civilians, with the victor being the most ruthless man on the block; which is how civil wars play out.

The only quick solution will be if the U.N. starts a dialogue with Gaddafi, gives his family his money back, grants him an amnesty and then sets up a U.N. interim government, on the ground.

But that’s pretty unlikely, because as is clearly demonstrated in this article, the U.N. and particularly USA, UK and France, have got “principles”. As if anyone cared for the past forty years when Gaddafi was looting his country and stashing the money abroad?

The “evidence” that Gaddafi was using his air-force or his tanks to target civilians, is about as solid as the “evidence” that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, standing-by ready to unleash on “peace-loving” nations, but who cares?

Gaddafi is an easy-target who managed to be a threat to both Israel via support for the Palestinians, and also a threat to Saudi Arabia because he deposed a monarch and he is against monarchies (dictators are not monarchs). Thus he is a threat to USA and UK who will support Israel no matter how many human-rights abuses are inflicted on the Palestinians, and they will always support the status quo in Saudi Arabia, so long as they promise to keep oil prices “fair”.

What the U.N. resolution is most likely to achieve is much more civilian casualties in exchange for oil concessions for the victors.

Long Live the New World Order! Just please don’t insult my intelligence by saying the U.N. resolution was about “human rights” or preventing “crimes against humanity”.

By Andrew Butter

Twenty years doing market analysis and valuations for investors in the Middle East, USA, and Europe; currently writing a book about BubbleOmics. Andrew Butter is managing partner of ABMC, an investment advisory firm, based in Dubai ( hbutter@eim.ae ), that he setup in 1999, and is has been involved advising on large scale real estate investments, mainly in Dubai.

© 2011 Copyright Andrew Butter- All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Andrew Butter Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in