Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. The Trump Stock Market Trap May Be Triggered - Barry_M_Ferguson
2.Why are Central Banks Buying Gold and Dumping Dollars? - Richard_Mills
3.US China War - Thucydides Trap and gold - Richard_Mills
4.Gold Price Trend Forcast to End September 2019 - Nadeem_Walayat
5.Money Saving Kids Gardening Growing Giant Sunflowers Summer Fun - Anika_Walayat
6.US Dollar Breakdown Begins, Gold Price to Bolt Higher - Jim_Willie_CB
7.INTEL (INTC) Stock Investing to Profit From AI Machine Learning Boom - Nadeem_Walayat
8.Will Google AI Kill Us? Man vs Machine Intelligence - N_Walayat
9.US Prepares for Currency War with China - Richard_Mills
10.Gold Price Epochal Breakout Will Not Be Negated by a Correction - Clive Maund
Last 7 days
WAYS TO SECURE YOUR FINANCIAL FUTURE - 20th Aug 19
Holiday Nightmares - Your Caravan is Missing! - 20th Aug 19
UK House Building and House Prices Trend Forecast - 20th Aug 19
The Next Stock Market Breakdown And The Setup - 20th Aug 19
5 Ways to Save by Using a Mortgage Broker - 20th Aug 19
Is This Time Different? Predictive Power of the Yield Curve and Gold - 19th Aug 19
New Dawn for the iGaming Industry in the United States - 19th Aug 19
Gold Set to Correct but Internals Remain Bullish - 19th Aug 19
Stock Market Correction Continues - 19th Aug 19
The Number One Gold Stock Of 2019 - 19th Aug 19
The State of the Financial Union - 18th Aug 19
The Nuts and Bolts: Yield Inversion Says Recession is Coming But it May take 24 months - 18th Aug 19
Markets August 19 Turn Date is Tomorrow – Are You Ready? - 18th Aug 19
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON - JNJ for Life Extension Pharma Stocks Investing - 17th Aug 19
Negative Bond Market Yields Tell A Story Of Shifting Economic Stock Market Leadership - 17th Aug 19
Is Stock Market About to Crash? Three Charts That Suggest It’s Possible - 17th Aug 19
It’s Time For Colombia To Dump The Peso - 17th Aug 19
Gold & Silver Stand Strong amid Stock Volatility & Falling Rates - 16th Aug 19
Gold Mining Stocks Q2’19 Fundamentals - 16th Aug 19
Silver, Transports, and Dow Jones Index At Targets – What Direct Next? - 16th Aug 19
When the US Bond Market Bubble Blows Up! - 16th Aug 19
Dark days are closing in on Apple - 16th Aug 19
Precious Metals Gone Wild! Reaching Initial Targets – Now What’s Next - 16th Aug 19
US Government Is Beholden To The Fed; And Vice-Versa - 15th Aug 19
GBP vs USD Forex Pair Swings Into Focus Amid Brexit Chaos - 15th Aug 19
US Negative Interest Rates Go Mainstream - With Some Glaring Omissions - 15th Aug 19
GOLD BULL RUN TREND ANALYSIS - 15th Aug 19
US Stock Market Could Fall 12% to 25% - 15th Aug 19
A Level Exam Results School Live Reaction Shock 2019! - 15th Aug 19
It's Time to Get Serious about Silver - 15th Aug 19
The EagleFX Beginners Guide – Financial Markets - 15th Aug 19
Central Banks Move To Keep The Global Markets Party Rolling – Part III - 14th Aug 19
You Have to Buy Bonds Even When Interest Rates Are Low - 14th Aug 19
Gold Near Term Risk is Increasing - 14th Aug 19
Installment Loans vs Personal Bank Loans - 14th Aug 19
ROCHE - RHHBY Life Extension Pharma Stocks Investing - 14th Aug 19
Gold Bulls Must Love the Hong Kong Protests - 14th Aug 19
Gold, Markets and Invasive Species - 14th Aug 19
Cannabis Stocks With Millennial Appeal - 14th Aug 19
August 19 (Crazy Ivan) Stock Market Event Only A Few Days Away - 13th Aug 19
This is the real move in gold and silver… it’s going to be multiyear - 13th Aug 19
Global Central Banks Kick Can Down The Road Again - 13th Aug 19
US Dollar Finally the Achillles Heel - 13th Aug 19
Financial Success Formula Failure - 13th Aug 19
How to Test Your Car Alternator with a Multimeter - 13th Aug 19
London Under Attack! Victoria Embankment Gardens Statues and Monuments - 13th Aug 19
More Stock Market Weakness Ahead - 12th Aug 19
Global Central Banks Move To Keep The Party Rolling Onward - 12th Aug 19
All Eyes On Copper - 12th Aug 19
History of Yield Curve Inversions and Gold - 12th Aug 19
Precious Metals Soar on Falling Yields, Currency Turmoil - 12th Aug 19
Why GraphQL? The Benefits Explained - 12th Aug 19

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

The No 1 Gold Stock for 2019

U.S. January Employment Report Suggests Continutation of Fed Easy Monetary Policy Stance

Economics / US Economy Feb 05, 2011 - 05:10 AM GMT

By: Asha_Bangalore

Economics

Diamond Rated - Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleThe January employment report includes special factors, so the format of today's commentary is different from the procedure we follow for each month's employment report.  The comment starts with a discussion of the special factors, followed by a conclusion, and ends with an analysis of customary details. 


The employment report for each month is compiled from two surveys - household survey and establishment survey.  The unemployment rate, derived from the household survey, fell to 9.0% in January from 9.4% in December and 9.8% in November (see Chart 1).  This is significantly bullish, given that the jobless rate has declined eight-tenths of a percentage point in a short span of two months.  At the same time, overall payroll employment rose only 36,000 in January (see Chart 2) and private sector payrolls climbed 50,000 (these estimates are from the establishment survey).  At first blush, these headlines present a mixed message. 


However, there are three aspects to note that will help in interpreting today's report:  (1) Inclement weather distorted survey results.  The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) indicated that 886,000 people were not at work in January due to bad weather as per the household survey (see Chart 3).  The count for January 2011 is high compared with similar tallies reported over the past decade for the January-February months, with the exception of the number reported for February 2010.  The status of these people in the labor force is still classified as "employed" in the household survey.  However, they would not be counted in the establishment survey.  The impact on the establishment survey count is a reduction in payrolls but the precise number is unclear.



(2) In January of each year, the BLS includes population adjustments in the estimates of the labor force which is an additional source of difficulty for interpretation of data.  (3) Payroll estimates, from the establishment survey, include benchmark revisions going back to April 2009.  These three factors make it challenging to draw firm conclusions from the data published today; essentially, we need 2-3 months of additional employment data to get a clean assessment of labor market conditions. 


In the meanwhile, we can use other information from the BLS to evaluate the current status of the labor market.  Table 1 is a comparison of data from the establishment survey and adjusted household survey numbers such that comparisons are on an apples-to-apples basis.  Employment estimates from the two surveys differ because they are based on different concepts of employment and estimation methods.  Three sets of numbers are listed in the table - payroll numbers as we see in the headlines of the report and adjustments to the household survey estimates after adjusting for population changes and consistent with the payroll survey concept of employment. 

                Source: http://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/ces_cps_trends.pdf.


1 - Payroll estimates for December 2010 and January 2011 are subject to revision.
2 - Adjusted for changes in population.
3 - Adjusted for changes in the population and the concept of employment in the payroll survey.
4 - The National Bureau of Economic Research established that the recession began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009.  Therefore, the peak of the prior business cycle is December 2007 and trough of the current business cycle is June 2009. 

The main takeaway from these numbers is that the number of jobs created since the recovery commenced in June 2009 is troubling and raises the level of concern for policymakers.  As shown in table 1, during the 19 months of economic recovery total payroll employment has dropped 284,000, while private sector payrolls have risen only 94,000 (not shown in Table 1).  Employment, as measured by adjustments to household survey data, also show declines.  Chart 4 illustrates the level of employment as noted in the three measures of employment in Table 1 and also includes private sector employment.  The most compelling point of Chart 4 is that the level of employment, irrespective of how it is measured, is still significantly below the prior peak even after 19 months of economic growth. 


 
Therefore, data from both surveys strongly suggest that job creation is proceeding in the desirable direction but at a tepid pace such that it is does not offer sufficient justification for the Fed to end the $600 billion purchase of Treasury securities (also known as QE2) before the planned expiration date of June 2011.  In light of this information, it is hardly a astonishing that Chairman Bernanke, indicated the following in his speech on February 3, 2011:  "Until we see a sustained period of stronger job creation, we cannot consider the recovery to be truly established."

Proceeding to details from the household survey, the labor force fell 504,000 in January after posting declines during each month since October and a nearly steady reading in September.  Typically, in a growing economy, the labor force grows.  As Chart 5 indicates, the labor force has failed to post a meaningful year-to-year increase after 19 months of economic growth.  The current trend is a new feature in the entire post-war period.  It should not be surprising to see an expansion of the labor force in the months ahead and a slightly higher unemployment rate, if employment falls short of the growth in the labor force. 


 
The participation rate inched down in January (64.2% vs. 64.3% in December) and the employment-population ration edged up (58.4% vs. 58.3% in December).  The broader measure of unemployment fell to 16.1% in January from 16.7% in December (see Chart 6), the lowest since April 2009.  The median duration of unemployment declined to 21.8 weeks from 22.4 weeks in December.  The percent of the unemployed who have been unemployed for six months and over fell to 43.8% in January from 44.3% in November.  In sum, although measures of unemployment remain at unacceptable levels, the January readings point to improving labor market conditions. 


 
Details of the establishment survey indicate that firms have not raised their payrolls at a robust pace in January.  Overall payrolls increased 36,000 and private hiring increased 50,000 in January, which is disappointing given that the economy has registered 19 months of growth.  The BLS published benchmark revisions from April 2009 in today's report.  As a result of the benchmark revisions, total payroll employment increased 909,000 in 2010, which is 215,000 lower than the prior estimate and private sector payrolls increased 1.145 million in 2010 vs. a gain of 1.346 million before revisions. 

In January, bad weather contributed to a reduction in construction employment but factory hiring increased and overall service sector employment rose only 18,000.  The highlights of changes in payroll employment in January 2011 are listed below.

Highlights of changes in payrolls during January 2011:
Construction: -32,000 vs. -17,000 in December
Manufacturing: +49,000 vs. +14,000 in December
Private sector service employment: +32,000 vs. +146,000 in December
Retail employment: +28,000 vs. +3,000 in December
Professional and business services: +31,000 vs. +54,000 in December
Temporary help: -11,400 vs. +38,100 in December
Financial activities: -10,000 vs. no change in December
Health care employment: +10,600 vs. +26,700 in December

In January, hourly earnings increased 0.4% to $22.86, a noticeable jump but not problematic as it yields a year-to-year gain of only 1.9%.  In addition, the high level of unemployment indicates that it is by no means a signal of future wage inflation.  The mild growth in payroll employment and the strong increase in hourly earnings points to a more-than-moderate increase in personal income during January.  The steady manufacturing man-hours index suggests an unchanged reading of factory production in January. 

Asha Bangalore — Senior Vice President and Economist

http://www.northerntrust.com

Asha Bangalore is Vice President and Economist at The Northern Trust Company, Chicago. Prior to joining the bank in 1994, she was Consultant to savings and loan institutions and commercial banks at Financial & Economic Strategies Corporation, Chicago.

Copyright © 2011 Asha Bangalore

The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of The Northern Trust Company. The Northern Trust Company does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of information contained herein, such information is subject to change and is not intended to influence your investment decisions.


© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules