Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Stocks, Bitcoin and Crypto Markets Breaking Bad on Donald Trump Pump - 21st Nov 24
Gold Price To Re-Test $2,700 - 21st Nov 24
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: This Is My Strong Warning To You - 21st Nov 24
Financial Crisis 2025 - This is Going to Shock People! - 21st Nov 24
Dubai Deluge - AI Tech Stocks Earnings Correction Opportunities - 18th Nov 24
Why President Trump Has NO Real Power - Deep State Military Industrial Complex - 8th Nov 24
Social Grant Increases and Serge Belamant Amid South Africa's New Political Landscape - 8th Nov 24
Is Forex Worth It? - 8th Nov 24
Nvidia Numero Uno in Count Down to President Donald Pump Election Victory - 5th Nov 24
Trump or Harris - Who Wins US Presidential Election 2024 Forecast Prediction - 5th Nov 24
Stock Market Brief in Count Down to US Election Result 2024 - 3rd Nov 24
Gold Stocks’ Winter Rally 2024 - 3rd Nov 24
Why Countdown to U.S. Recession is Underway - 3rd Nov 24
Stock Market Trend Forecast to Jan 2025 - 2nd Nov 24
President Donald PUMP Forecast to Win US Presidential Election 2024 - 1st Nov 24
At These Levels, Buying Silver Is Like Getting It At $5 In 2003 - 28th Oct 24
Nvidia Numero Uno Selling Shovels in the AI Gold Rush - 28th Oct 24
The Future of Online Casinos - 28th Oct 24
Panic in the Air As Stock Market Correction Delivers Deep Opps in AI Tech Stocks - 27th Oct 24
Stocks, Bitcoin, Crypto's Counting Down to President Donald Pump! - 27th Oct 24
UK Budget 2024 - What to do Before 30th Oct - Pensions and ISA's - 27th Oct 24
7 Days of Crypto Opportunities Starts NOW - 27th Oct 24
The Power Law in Venture Capital: How Visionary Investors Like Yuri Milner Have Shaped the Future - 27th Oct 24
This Points To Significantly Higher Silver Prices - 27th Oct 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

The Dummies Guide To Valuing A CDO: Reference Barnett-Hart’s Thesis

Interest-Rates / Credit Crisis 2010 Mar 20, 2010 - 03:01 PM GMT

By: Andrew_Butter

Interest-Rates

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleThe “News” over the past eighteen months, is that the people who said that they knew how to do a rating on a CDO (Collateralized Debt Obligation), now say they don’t know how to do that.

And the people who said they knew how to value a CDO, or a RMBS (Residential Mortgaged Backed Security), now say they can’t do that either.


And The Reason Why? Well they realised that in fact they never knew how to do it in the first place, which is why they managed to lose “X” trillion for their employers or customers, which fortunately (for them) the American Taxpayer has agreed to pay back, on account of the fact that people who are completely clueless are essential for the proper functioning of the US economy.

That’s nice.

Although, on reflection, I’m quite glad I don’t pat US taxes.

I was reading A.K. Barnett-Hart’s now famous undergraduate thesis “The Story of the CDO Market Meltdown: An Empirical Analysis”. It’s impressive, it’s also a very well written and easy-to-read account of what happened; you can find a link to it here:

http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2010/03/15/michael-lewiss-the-big-short-read-the-harvard-thesis-instead/

One of her conclusions, based on doing multivariate regression analysis was that the best predictor of a CDO default; is the year it was written, like if it used mortgages written in 2006 and 2007.  I’m not sure if I understood her table right but it looked like she got a 35% R-Squared on that.

Pity she didn’t put in the extent of mispricing of the housing market as a variable (housing was the fundamental asset that collateralized most of those instruments).

For example – here is a plot of data that I eyeballed from one of her charts (Fig 11), plotted against the extent of market mispricing that I calculated in September 2008:

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article6250.html

What that says is essentially confirming what Barnett-Hart was saying, i.e. that when the junk going into the CDO was 2006 or 2007 vintage, well, they blew up; but what that adds is putting a number to it, and identifying the key driver.

The straight line R-Squared is 88% for twenty points of data (love to have the actual but there you go), I suspect though the best-fit is an “S” curve which has a 92% R-Squared.

That’s a pretty similar result to the analysis that I did a while ago:

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article12918.html

That was looking at an analysis that I did of a study done by a team from Columbia University led by Dr. Wei Jiang which as far as I have seen represents the most coherent study of the mortgage market in USA (not as famous as Ms. Barnett-Hart but then she writes really nice, and dare I say it, she is a LOT prettier).

So two pieces of evidence that basically the level of toxicity is a function of how badly the geniuses misread the market mispricing, basically if the LTV you use is about right, then OK, defaults are low, like about zero.

You are a genius – collect $6 billion in fees.

BUT if the value you use for the “L” in the LTV is wrong – like by about 40% too high (I’m talking about reference “Other than Market Value here, not “What you might have sold the asset to some dumb bastard to yesterday” (M-2-M)),  then the chances of a default are well pretty much linear in line with the mispricing.

Except there is an “S-Curve” – which is normal in nature.

I used to work on a toxic-asset-assembly line, my job was to work out “V” , and I’m proud to say that every  “V’ that I worked out was the “V” in ten years time (that I said it would be).

Pretty boring stuff, but if you have money and you want to make you “V” go up, it’s a good idea to know what “V” really is today (outside of the “V” you can get from selling something to someone dumber than you).

Insofar as either rating or valuing a CDO (or any other sort of toxic asset is concerned), what this analysis shows is that 90% of that is about the “V”.

Work out the “V” and well, let the remaining 10% just take care of itself.

By Andrew Butter

Twenty years doing market analysis and valuations for investors in the Middle East, USA, and Europe; currently writing a book about BubbleOmics. Andrew Butter is managing partner of ABMC, an investment advisory firm, based in Dubai ( hbutter@eim.ae ), that he setup in 1999, and is has been involved advising on large scale real estate investments, mainly in Dubai.

© 2010 Copyright Andrew Butter- All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Andrew Butter Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in