AIG Secret Deals Conspiracy Starting to Unravel
Politics / Market Manipulation Jan 29, 2010 - 12:19 AM GMTBy: Mike_Shedlock
 David Reilly at BusinessWeek takes dead aim at Treasury Secretary Tim   Geithner and the New York Fed in Secret Banking Cabal Emerges From AIG Shadows.
David Reilly at BusinessWeek takes dead aim at Treasury Secretary Tim   Geithner and the New York Fed in Secret Banking Cabal Emerges From AIG Shadows. 
The idea of secret banking cabals that control the country and   global economy are a given among conspiracy theorists who stockpile ammo,   bottled water and peanut butter. Wednesday’s hearing described a secretive group   deploying billions of dollars to favored banks, operating with little oversight   by the public or elected officials.
    
    We’re talking about the Federal   Reserve Bank of New York, whose role as the most influential part of the   federal-reserve system -- apart from the matter of AIG’s bailout -- deserves   further congressional scrutiny.
    
    Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was   head of the New York Fed at the time of the AIG moves. The hearing before the   House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform also focused on what many in   Congress believe was the New York Fed’s subsequent attempt to cover up buyout   details and who benefited.
    
    By pursuing this line of inquiry, the hearing   revealed some of the inner workings of the New York Fed and the outsized role it   plays in banking. This insight is especially valuable given that the New York   Fed is a quasi-governmental institution that isn’t subject to citizen intrusions   such as freedom of information requests, unlike the Federal Reserve.
    
    This   impenetrability comes in handy since the bank is the preferred vehicle for many   of the Fed’s bailout programs. It’s as though the New York Fed was a black-ops   outfit for the nation’s central bank.
    
    As Representative Marcy Kaptur told   Geithner at the hearing: “A lot of people think that the president of the New   York Fed works for the U.S. government. But in fact you work for the private   banks that elected you.”
    
    Let’s take Geithner at his word that a failure   to resolve the insurer’s default swaps would have led to financial Armageddon.   Given the stakes, you might think Geithner would have coordinated actions with   then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson. Yet Paulson testified that he wasn’t in   the loop.
    
    “I had no involvement at all, in the payment to the   counterparties, no involvement whatsoever,” Paulson said.
    
    Fed Chairman   Bernanke also wasn’t involved. In a written response to questions from   Representative Darrell Issa, Bernanke said he “was not directly involved in the   negotiations” with AIG’s counterparty banks.
    
    Geither said he recused   himself from the bank’s day-to-day activities, even though he never actually   signed a formal letter of recusal.
    
    New York Fed staff and outside lawyers   from Davis Polk & Wardell edited AIG communications to investors and   intervened with the Securities and Exchange Commission to shield details about   the buyout transactions, according to a report by Issa.
    
    That the New York   Fed, a quasi-governmental body, was able to push around the SEC, an   executive-branch agency, deserves a congressional hearing all by   itself.
    
    Later, when it became clear information would be disclosed, New   York Fed legal group staffer James Bergin e-mailed colleagues saying: “I have to   think this train is probably going to leave the station soon and we need to   focus our efforts on explaining the story as best we can. There were too many   people involved in the deals -- too many counterparties, too many lawyers and   advisors, too many people from AIG -- to keep a determined Congress from the   information.”
    
  Think of the enormity of that statement. A staffer at a   body with little public accountability and that exists to serve bankers is   lamenting the inability to keep Congress in the dark.
Most know I am   not a big believer in conspiracies. I regularly dismiss them. However, this one   was clear from the beginning and like all massive conspiracies, it is now in the   light of day.
    
    I have talked about conspiracies involving Geithner,   Paulson, Bernanke, and former Bank of America Lewis on many occasions. I am more   than happy to add another post to the list.
    
    April 24, 2009: Let the Criminal Indictments Begin: Paulson, Bernanke,   Lewis
    
    June 26, 2009: Bernanke Suffers From Selective Memory Loss; Paulson Calls Bank of   America "Turd in the Punchbowl"
    
    July   17, 2009: Paulson Admits Coercion; Where are the   Indictments?
    
    October 20, 2009: Bernanke Guilty of Coercion and Market   Manipulation
    
    January 07, 2010: Time To Indict Geithner For Securities Fraud
    
    January 26, 2010: Questions Geithner Cannot Escape
    
    I am quite sure there   will be more opportunities to add to the list.
    
    Strange Conspiracy Involving No One
    
  
- Geithner recused himself although there is no record of it.
- Paulson knows nothing about it and was not in the loop
- Bernanke either does not remember and/or was not involved.
  Amazingly this conspiracy involves no one. It is a   historic event. Hundred billion dollar bailout decisions just happened. No one   made them, no one was responsible for them, and no one was in the loop, yet all   those not involved agree the process must be kept secret.
  
  David Reilly:   "Think of the enormity of that statement. A   staffer at a body with little public accountability and that exists to serve   bankers is lamenting the inability to keep Congress in the   dark."
  
  In the wake of these happenings, David Andolfatto at the   St. Louis Fed just happened to step out of the blue right on time making a   mathematical plea defending secrecy: In Defense Of Secrecy; Three Prong Attack On The Fed; Selective   Myopia .
  
  Steve Keen, a real economist, disputes the thesis as did   others. Please see Steve Keen on Banking Secrets and Fed Transparency for a   detailed rebuttal of the thesis.
  
  Juts the other day, I received an email   from David Andolfatto, the author "On the Social Cost of Transparency in   Monetary Economies", the article praising secrecy, offering to explain the   thesis in plain English. I will take him up on it.
  
However, I think   anyone with any common sense has had more than enough of secret backroom deals,   especially those that somehow no one makes.
By Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.comClick Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List
 Mike Shedlock / Mish is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management . Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. 
  
  Visit Sitka Pacific's Account Management Page  to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.
 I do weekly podcasts every Thursday on HoweStreet  and a brief 7 minute segment on Saturday on CKNW AM 980  in Vancouver. 
  
  When not writing about stocks or the economy I spends a great deal of time on photography and in the garden. I have over 80 magazine and book cover credits. Some of my Wisconsin and gardening images can be seen at MichaelShedlock.com . 
© 2010 Mike Shedlock, All Rights Reserved.
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.
	

 
  
 
	