The Fed Induced Recessions
Economics / Recession 2023 Nov 08, 2022 - 10:17 PM GMTBy: Dan_Steinbock
From early 2020 to early 2021, the Fed funds rate had been at 0.25%. Though the inflation rate in the US slowed for the third month to 8.2% in September 2022, it remained above market forecasts.
The energy index increased almost 20%, while the increase in the cost of food (over 11%) was close to its highest since 1979. Moreover, the core rate which excludes volatile food and energy, rose to 6.6%, the highest since August of 1982, and above market expectations. Inflationary pressures remain elevated (Figure).
Figure           US Inflation and interest rate
  
  Source:  TradingEconomics, DifferenceGroup
Recently, the Fed raised the rate to 3.75%-4%. It was a sixth consecutive hike and the fourth straight three-quarter point increase, pushing borrowing costs to a new high since 2008.
Downplayed  risks
  Since  the onset of 2020, the Fed has made two cardinal mistakes. Ignoring the WHO’s warnings about the  international spread of the Covid-19, it began to cut rates only belatedly in  March 2020. The second mistake ensued after mid-year 2021, when inflation started  to climb rapidly. Instead of a timely response, the Fed chairman Jerome Powell downplayed  the threat of soaring prices calling them “transitionary." 
  Despite  multiple red flags since then, the rate hikes’ net effects continue to be  underestimated. Last January, I warned that US inflation is the global risk of 2022.  Until then, the Fed had largely ignored soaring inflation. Due to the belated  response, I expected the ensuing risks to penalize the ailing global recovery.
  In  February, after the disastrous failure of international diplomacy over Ukraine,  I cautioned that global recovery is fading and the world economy must cope with  the risk of stagflationary recession. 
  In  the first week of March, I predicted that the unwarranted proxy war in Ukraine  would “severely penalize Ukraine, Russia, the US and  the NATO, Europe, developing countries and the global economy” which  would compound the threats of energy and food inflation. 
The  Fed’s rampage toward 5% 
  In  September, I predicted that US inflation and aggressive rate hikes are pushing  the West into recession territory, while collateral damage is derailing development  elsewhere. 
  As  I projected then, the Fed was preparing another 75-point hike, followed by another  50-points hike. That would take the year-end rate to 4.5%. 
  What  next? While the markets hoped for  a smaller hike in December, Fed chair Powell noted the ultimate level of interest  rates will be higher than previously expected. 
  Assuming  still another 50 points hike in the first quarter of 2023, the Fed seems to be  aiming at a rate of 5%. But will that prove "terminal"? 
  Trade  wars, deglobalization and unwarranted conflicts tend to foster inflation. Will  their impact really diminish by March 31, 2023? And what about energy and food  inflation, and the new pandemic variants? 
  If  assumptions are flawed, corrections ensue in the markets.
Toward  an inclusive global monetary system
  If the Fed’s monetary pain isn’t enough, the  White House’s foreign policy fosters runaway inflation and elevated uncertainty.  The net effect has been the lethal mix of a global energy crisis and what the  UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has called the “meltdown of the global food  system.” 
  As aggressive rate hikes continue to push the  US, the UK, and Europe toward a stagflationary recession, peace talks are  avoided in Ukraine whereas war rhetoric is gaining in Taiwan and several other  international "hot spots." 
  Indeed,  a rapid, proactive diplomacy  has not been the objective in Ukraine. Instead, as US defense secretary Lloyd Austin acknowledged in late April:  “We want to see Russia weakened.” Today it seems that the effective strategic  objective is to undermine China’s economy, even at the expense of Chinese,  Asian and global economic prospects.
Aggressive  rate hikes are predicated on greater unemployment and income polarization in  America and worldwide. It is the 1980s déjà vu all over again, but with lost years  in many advanced and emerging economies, and lost decades in developing countries.  The difference is that today’s  international environment is far more dire. 
  That’s  what happens when the monetary policy of a single major country dominates the  global economic prospects. Effectively, 332 million people dictate the future  of 8 billion people. It is a system mired in conflicts of interests; and a  system that fosters unwarranted suffering worldwide.
  What  we need is a monetary system that prioritizes peace and stability, full  employment and steady prices - an inclusive system that looks like the world  population it is supposed to serve.
Dr. Dan Steinbock is the founder of Difference Group and has served at the India, China and America Institute (US), Shanghai Institute for International Studies (China) and the EU Center (Singapore). For more, see http://www.differencegroup.net/
© 2022 Copyright Dan Steinbock - All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.
Dan  Steinbock Archive  | 
    
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.
	

  