Odd Business at Twitter
Politics / Social Media Jul 29, 2019 - 05:03 PM GMTBy: Stephen_Merrill
	
	
  
In  today’s political world, there is one place everyone must join, even without a  Facebook account.
  
Twitter is the online platform that has become the singular global  square for interactive discussion of political people and events.  Surprisingly, Twitter has no real  competition as the titan for this niche in the West and well beyond.   The  far smaller Reddit does not have the focus on politics that Twitter offers,  though you will find on Reddit far better discussion of public policy  issues.  Facebook’s market-share in this  space has steadily diminished.
Twitter’s  top-dog status on political talk is also in place when compared to platforms that  concentrate on a single country’s own market.   None match Twitter’s usage in those countries.  
  
Twitter at first helped make Donald Trump the President without really  trying to.  Then Trump became the  guarantor of Twitter’s dominance in its marketplace, despite Twitter’s Leftist identity.  
This  is all very odd, indeed.
  
  Jumping the Shark
  Many  fortnights ago, this author joined the debate at Twitter, despite  earlier pledges that I will never “tweet” since it is sounds so unmanly. StephenMerrill@StephenMerrillAk  
  
  Twitter is the arena, after all.
  
  Naturally from the outset, my tweeting was freedom-fighting across the board in  a political world dominated by corrupt collectivism. The 4200 and running tweets  tend to concentrate on war and peace and therefore protesting the Washington  War Party’s ravaging of the world and of the global reputation of the United  States.
  
  I try to be the scourge for Mike Pompeo, John Bolton, Little Marco, Max Boot,  Bill Krystol and Lawrence Tribe, all oarsmen along the River Styxx.  I have a special place for Psycho Joe Scarborough  and Mean Mika Brzezinski.
  
  So, the libertarian viewpoint of Twitter’s Grizzly Lover was obvious from the  beginning.
  
  Odd Business
  
  After slowly attracting several hundred followers on Twitter, I  noticed something quite distressing.  My  tweets were only being distributed to a couple of dozen hashtags.  My assumption had been that, like Facebook,  my tweets would go to my followers at least, and hopefully to many others  also.  
  I  had no way of knowing who the few people were who were receiving my tweets,  whether followers or someone else.   This  led to the notion that I did not know whether my tweets truly arrived anywhere,  aside from receiving the replies and likes.
  
  Looking  thoroughly through the Twitter rules posted online, I left with zero information  about how your tweet distribution is supposed to flow.
  
  So, I decided to bribe the tiger now, as so many prompts from Twitter ask  you to do.  Paying Twitter directly may be the only way to create my own Twitterati I thought, even  the only way to reach my own followers.  
  After  all, for a mere $100 Twitter promised to deliver my tweet, any tweet, to  48,000 hashtags.
  
  Naturally, I selected the most compelling tweet that a broad range of people might  be attracted to.  The campaign is completed  over 2-3 days.
  
  A few dozen new followers then signed up.   Two repeat purchases accomplished about the same.
  
  The frustrating thing I discovered was that my promoted tweets were only going  to 12,000 to 15,000 hashtags! This is about a 75% breach of contract by Twitter.
  
  I then discovered there is no way at the web site to contest or even discuss a Twitter ad payment with the company.  I  challenge anyone to find an email link, phone number or postal address to contact Twitter about disputed promotions.
  
  Fighting Back Anyway
  Of  course, a lawsuit to recover half of $300 is more bother than benefit and seems  a bit petty.  Even determining the state  court with jurisdiction for a suit over Twitter promotions is a dicey  question.
  
  But there is more than one way to right such a wrong. This time the best alternative  method completely succeeded.
  Consumers  need to know the protections provided by paying vendors with a credit  card.  The strongest privilege by far is  a “rough and ready” smalls claims court for use by any customer, disputing  payments by challenge within 60-days.   The grounds for dispute may be nonperformance, partial nonperformance,  inferior product or fraud.
  
  You may not know your seller online at all, but Visa and Mastercard are holding  their money spigot subject to their rules.
  
  So, I made the three disputes with my credit card account, alleging a large  partial nonperformance for my Twitter promotions.  Twitter did not file a reply within  2-weeks. So, the disputes were all successful, as the rules clearly called-for  in any event.
  
  Most key here, over the very days this was happening my Twitter following  suddenly went down by almost half.  This  is the way Twitter fights back obviously.
  
  So, I decided my further response would be to prove with direct evidence that Twitter treats libertarians entirely different from its favored Leftists, a totally  rigged platform.
  
  So, trying to keep my name out of it, I arranged a Twitter account as a  Bernie Sanders supporter.  I was determined  to find out if even the most clueless Leftism rules by fiat on Twitter.
  
  With some initial progress, the project failed.   I simply could not go online day after day to spout absurd notions about  people and money. So, there is no valid data base.
  
  Generally, if my Twitter posts decline in number, so does my  followership, as if programmed at a certain pace.  The same works in reverse by greatly increasing  the number of tweets, always in a seemingly programmed way.
  An Enterprise for Profit?
  
  Here is a  company that seems wholly concerned with ideology, even to the point of  purposely refusing to do its job for customers who have far different political  views.  
  Twitter strangles the comprehensive debate on its platform that could explode the  company’s appeal and revenues, as the Twitter business plan seeks to accomplish  as a formal matter.  Indeed, the number  of annual tweets has been declining generally since 2014, obviously due to  terrible business sense.
  
  Though the cofounder and CEO of Twitter, Jack Dorsey, through 2017 did  not take a salary from Twitter for his  efforts, the lack of those wages has not prevented Dorsey from being a huge  donor to the US Democratic Party.
  
  Emerging from ten years of bottom-line losses dating from Twitter ‘s beginning,  and now with the commercial power of the Oval Office still wholly at its back, Twitter has claimed a profitable year for the first time, some $1.2B in net  revenues in 2018.  That sounds great  until you consider that in the 2010-2017 period Twitter managed to lose  $2.6b. This brings Twitter’s profit-loss performance overall to a $1.4b  loss, as of the beginning of 2019.
  
  The failure of Twitter to capitalize in profits on its dominant market-share  has not dampened spirits on Wall Street for Twitter though.  The company presently has a $4.7b value for 4000  employees distributing SMS texts, just as so many web sites do with basic  software.   
  It  is as if many of the powerful people know there is so much more working behind  the scenes at Twitter.
  The Trump on Twitter Mystery
  
  What leaves  Trump supporters mystified is why the President apparently is never going to  leave extreme left-wing Twitter.   One would naturally expect a conservative, rabble-rousing President not  to continue to empower the opposition in such a grand way.  
  What  is there to possibly gain in Trump not simply saying “go for it”, let  conservatives now have their own place within the social media business with  his daily support?  
  
  Also, where is the conservatives’ alternative platform to Twitter in any  event, even without Trump directly backing the move?  The platform could be launched in a flash.  
  After  all, half of the potential customers in political America and beyond are being  ripped off and lied to by Twitter?  
  With  a conservative alternative in operation and other political platforms coming,  Twitter would then be headed the way of the dinosaur, given the way it  conducts business.  Indeed, the President  himself could then be quickly forced to abandon Twitter, a death-knell  for Dorsey ever getting that Twitter salary again. 
  What  is the catch then that keeps Twitter the centerpiece?  Is someone in Washington purposely scaring away  venture capital from such a seemingly excellent business opportunity?
  The Common Answer to the Oddest Things
  
  The only available explanation for this conundrum is stated in a single word:  imperialism.  This recognition also  confirms that the Washington War Party demands that Twitter remain the  dominant political platform.  No one  dares try to change things.
  Because imperialism unites Trump, Pelosi and Schumer, the Deep State, the  Pentagon and the spy agencies.  US  Imperialism by any means is favored by almost all the US billionaires, who also  happen to own the nation now.
  Because  billionaires are the only beneficiaries of the US wars going back to the  Vietnam war.  
  Billionaires  own the arms manufacturers, among the most profitable of global businesses  quite perversely.  
  Billionaires  own the fossil fuel extraction companies that love to offer smaller nations  deals they simply cannot refuse.
  Billionaires  own the banks that rule the fiat USD financial system that is the central enduring  power of the US empire.  As Saddam and  Ghaddafi learned, the USD dominance is directly tied to the threat of military  invasion for noncompliance by renegade nations to the New World Order.  Under instruction now are Iran and Venezuela.
  To facilitate this show of horrors, the billionaires own the news media that  over 90% of Americans consume.  The  sophistry for war has been wall-to-wall for decades now.  
  The  more centralized the official narrative, the greater its spell.  The control of the dissemination of  information is central to empire building.  
  Only  one basic news source is the ideal, especially at times of growing economic  failure for the masses.  Were information  to splinter in all directions it would be disastrous to Empire management.
  Service to the Modern Gods
  The  building skills of the human have always been very impressive.  But the ability to puncture oppressive  political ideology has always been sorely lacking.  This dual nature is what led to Egyptians  building great pyramids all to the vanity of a single person.  It has led to a modern world that is corrupted  by war and poverty, when humanity should have long ago overcome these basic  weaknesses, all remaining in place now for the benefit of a tiny fraction of  society.
  So,  Jack Dorsey is prominent within the propaganda department of the Psycho Empire.  He manages information for the illuminati.   His job is entirely secure, about written-in-stone.  He works closely with Mark Zuckerberg of  Facebook and Sundar Pichai of Google, too closely.
  Though  the pay is good for propaganda work like Jack’s, wherever it comes from, Twitter pay is not in the same league with, say, the enforcement end of the  Empire.  Jeffrey Epstein, for instance, high  up in the blackmail division of the Empire, has lived way beyond extravagance  and hugely beyond the rule of law for decades.   No positive achievements needed.
  But one can see now in Epstein what kind of risks this does entail, even as a  loyal subject only doing his job. Fall guys are essential in extreme cases,  after all.
  But even the high-tech news boys could be facing the business end of a people’s  pitchfork rather soon.  When the Empire  expires so will the careers of most of its supplicants, all departments beware.
  Whatever will become of my Twitterati now?
  STEPHEN MERRILL
  Mr. Merrill, a practicing Anchorage attorney,  served in the Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps and as a Navy Reserve  Intelligence Officer.  Contact him here. 
  Mr. Merrill is the editor of the Alaska Liberty Corner.
  
  Copyright © 2019 STEPHEN MERRILL - All Rights Reserved 
Disclaimer:   The above is a matter of opinion provided for general   information purposes only   and is not intended as investment advice.   Information and analysis above are   derived from sources and utilising   methods believed to be reliable, but we   cannot accept responsibility   for any losses you may incur as a result of this   analysis. Individuals   should consult with their personal financial   advisors.
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.
	

  