Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Investing in a Bubble Mania Stock Market Trending Towards Financial Crisis 2.0 CRASH! - 9th Sep 21
2.Tech Stocks Bubble Valuations 2000 vs 2021 - 25th Sep 21
3.Stock Market FOMO Going into Crash Season - 8th Oct 21
4.Stock Market FOMO Hits September Brick Wall - Evergrande China's Lehman's Moment - 22nd Sep 21
5.Crypto Bubble BURSTS! BTC, ETH, XRP CRASH! NiceHash Seizes Funds on Account Halting ALL Withdrawals! - 19th May 21
6.How to Protect Your Self From a Stock Market CRASH / Bear Market? - 14th Oct 21
7.AI Stocks Portfolio Buying and Selling Levels Going Into Market Correction - 11th Oct 21
8.Why Silver Price Could Crash by 20%! - 5th Oct 21
9.Powell: Inflation Might Not Be Transitory, After All - 3rd Oct 21
10.Global Stock Markets Topped 60 Days Before the US Stocks Peaked - 23rd Sep 21
Last 7 days
CATHY WOOD ARK GARBAGE ARK Funds Heading for 90% STOCK CRASH! - 22nd Jan 22
Gold Is the Belle of the Ball. Will Its Dance Turn Bearish? - 22nd Jan 22
Best Neighborhoods to Buy Real Estate in San Diego - 22nd Jan 22
Stock Market January PANIC AI Tech Stocks Buying Opp - Trend Forecast 2022 - 21st Jan 21
How to Get Rich in the MetaVerse - 20th Jan 21
Should you Buy Payment Disruptor Stocks in 2022? - 20th Jan 21
2022 the Year of Smart devices, Electric Vehicles, and AI Startups - 20th Jan 21
Oil Markets More Animated by Geopolitics, Supply, and Demand - 20th Jan 21
WARNING - AI STOCK MARKET CRASH / BEAR SWITCH TRIGGERED! - 19th Jan 22
Fake It Till You Make It: Will Silver’s Motto Work on Gold? - 19th Jan 22
Crude Oil Smashing Stocks - 19th Jan 22
US Stagflation: The Global Risk of 2022 - 19th Jan 22
Stock Market Trend Forecast Early 2022 - Tech Growth Value Stocks Rotation - 18th Jan 22
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: Are We Setting Up For A 'Mini-Crash'? - 18th Jan 22
Mobile Sports Betting is on a rise: Here’s why - 18th Jan 22
Exponential AI Stocks Mega-trend - 17th Jan 22
THE NEXT BITCOIN - 17th Jan 22
Gold Price Predictions for 2022 - 17th Jan 22
How Do Debt Relief Services Work To Reduce The Amount You Owe? - 17th Jan 22
RIVIAN IPO Illustrates We are in the Mother of all Stock Market Bubbles - 16th Jan 22
All Market Eyes on Copper - 16th Jan 22
The US Dollar Had a Slip-Up, but Gold Turned a Blind Eye to It - 16th Jan 22
A Stock Market Top for the Ages - 16th Jan 22
FREETRADE - Stock Investing Platform, the Good, Bad and Ugly Review, Free Shares, Cancelled Orders - 15th Jan 22
WD 14tb My Book External Drive Unboxing, Testing and Benchmark Performance Amazon Buy Review - 15th Jan 22
Toyland Ferris Wheel Birthday Fun at Gulliver's Rother Valley UK Theme Park 2022 - 15th Jan 22
What You Should Know About a TailoredPay High Risk Merchant Account - 15th Jan 22
Best Metaverse Tech Stocks Investing for 2022 and Beyond - 14th Jan 22
Gold Price Lagging Inflation - 14th Jan 22
Get Your Startup Idea Up And Running With These 7 Tips - 14th Jan 22
What Happens When Your Flight Gets Cancelled in the UK? - 14th Jan 22
How to Profit from 2022’s Biggest Trend Reversal - 11th Jan 22
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: Are We Ready To Drop To 4400SPX? - 11th Jan 22
What's the Role of an Affiliate Marketer? - 11th Jan 22
Essential Things To Know Before You Set Up A Limited Liability Company - 11th Jan 22
NVIDIA THE KING OF THE METAVERSE! - 10th Jan 22
Fiscal and Monetary Cliffs Have Arrived - 10th Jan 22
The Meteoric Rise of Investing in Trading Cards - 10th Jan 22
IBM The REAL Quantum Metaverse STOCK! - 9th Jan 22
WARNING Failing NVME2 M2 SSD Drives Can Prevent Systems From Booting - Corsair MP600 - 9th Jan 22
The Fed’s inflated cake and a ‘quant’ of history - 9th Jan 22
NVME M2 SSD FAILURE WARNING Signs - Corsair MP600 1tb Drive - 9th Jan 22
Meadowhall Sheffield Christmas Lights 2021 Shopping - Before the Switch on - 9th Jan 22
How Does Insurance Work In Europe? Find Out Here - 9th Jan 22
MATTERPORT (MTTR) - DIGITIZING THE REAL WORLD - METAVERSE INVESTING 2022 - 7th Jan 22
Effect of Deflation On The Gold Price - 7th Jan 22
Stock Market 2022 Requires Different Strategies For Traders/Investors - 7th Jan 22
Old Man Winter Will Stimulate Natural Gas and Heating Oil Demand - 7th Jan 22
Is The Lazy Stock Market Bull Strategy Worth Considering? - 7th Jan 22
METAVERSE - NEW LIFE FOR SONY AGEING GAMING GIANT? - 6th Jan 2022
What Elliott Waves Show for Asia Pacific Stock and Financial Markets 2022 - 6th Jan 2022
Why You Should Register Your Company - 6th Jan 2022
4 Ways to Invest in Silver for 2022 - 6th Jan 2022
UNITY (U) - Metaverse Stock Analysis Investing for 2022 and Beyond - 5th Jan 2022
Stock Market Staving Off Risk-Off - 5th Jan 2022
Gold and Silver Still Hungover After New Year’s Eve - 5th Jan 2022
S&P 500 In an Uncharted Territory, But Is Sky the Limit? - 5th Jan 2022

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

France's Iranian Nuclear Obsession

Politics / France Jan 07, 2014 - 04:58 PM GMT

By: Andrew_McKillop

Politics

The Obama Administration Just Might Think

Writing for Wall Street Journal January 7, the former International Herald Tribune editor and Bilderberg Club member John Vinocour said that it looks awfully evident that France's hardline on Iranian nuclear proliferation has been outsmarted by the Iranians – and has even been used by the Obama administration to do what it can to increase the President's tattered public approval ratings at home. Vinocour wrote that if the US “takes over the show” in negotiating with Tehran, “In this case, the Obama administration just might think that France, with its irritating vision of itself as the world's guardian of nuclear non-proliferation, could be dismissed as a strategic nag, increasingly alone, and no longer Washington's co-equal in dealing with Tehran”.


France already consoled itself with Saudi petrodollars. It can comfortably go it alone with Saudi Arabia as its major arms-buying partner in the Middle East - committed to overthrowing the al-Assad regime in Syria and installing a hardline Islamic fundamentalist “caliphate”. As the Wahabite Kingdom less comfortably for France is also trying to do in a string of former French colonies in Africa, which include Mali and the Central African Republic – two countries where French troops are battling Saudi-financed jihadists!

Without a single trace of irony, Hollande-fan John Vinocour says that France is “struggling to halt a jihadist takeover of the broken and lawless Central African Republic”, and because France will need more US military support in its African adventure fighting Saudi funded rebels, Paris will have to stop “butting heads with the Americans on Iran”. If not, he goes on to say, France's so-called mission in Africa could become a shambles, but Vinocour was far too Hollande-friendly to say that many persons in France think the “mission” started out that way, and will end that way.

France and Nuclear Proliferation

President Hollande's hardline on Iranian nuclear proliferation was declared, by himself, to be a constant or “historic” refusal to tolerate or encourage any country – outside the 5 UN Security Council declared nuclear powers – to obtain the means to build or acquire nuclear weapons.

This however and in fact is a travesty of France's historical role as the chief enabler of Israel's atomic weapons program.

Only published for the first time on 17 November 2013 by the French weekly news magazine Le Nouvel Observateur, the long and detailed report of the summit meeting between Charles de Gaulle and David Ben Gurion of Israel – held in France in June 1960 – was supplied to the news magazine by a former close aide of de Gaulle from the 1940s, who had accompanied de Gaulle throughout his political career. The 1960 meeting had French-Israeli nuclear cooperation high up the agenda. Ben Gurion wanted France to continue and intensify this secret aid that had started in 1956.

From 1956, French companies and its State nuclear commission (the CEA) started building a heavy water moderated, plutonium reactor at Dimona. Exactly the same type later used by Pakistan, built by Canada, for its own atomic weapons program, and the same type Iran wants to build at Arak. The terms of the secret 1956 contract and agreement included the condition that when or if Israel utilized its French-built plutonium separating workshops, built in 1957, to produce bomb-grade plutonium and then produce nuclear weapons, Israel would demand France's approval to go ahead.

There was no condition in the agreement of 1956 whereby Israel must not produce weapons – only the requirement that Israel must notify France of its intention to produce them. In his meeting with de Gaulle at the Elysees Palace, Ben Gurion in late Spring 1960 declared that Israel wanted France to accelerate its works at Dimona and the linked plutonium separating facility, with the goal for Israel of rapidly producing its first nuclear weapon.

De Gaulle had a carefully nurtured public image of friend of the oil exporting Arab countries and oil-rich Iran, and of being neutral or hostile to Israel, but his response to Ben Gurion's declaration was to politely ask why Israel wanted the bomb. The verbatim account of their meeting of 53 years ago, published for the first time in 2013, says that both leaders were entirely frank on their positions and throughout the meeting were cordial with each other. Ben Gurion said the USSR's supply of advanced MIG 19 fighter jets to Nasser's Egypt made Israel totally vulnerable, because Israel had no equivalent airplanes. Egypt could bomb Tel Aviv or Haifa, and destroy Israel's three-only military air bases whenever it wanted. Within an hour, Israel would be destroyed, he said.

 The verbatim account of the meeting says that de Gaulle understood the mortal anguish of Israel and, being a declared nuclear power itself, said France would never permit any nation to destroy Israel. But he conceded that even using French nuclear-armed retaliation, this would be too late to save Israel.

De Gaulle also recognized that if Israel had the bomb, this would be the ultimate deterrent – but added this would only be true until Nasser's Egypt itself had either developed nuclear weapons, or acquired them, probably from the USSR.  De Gaulle, according to his aide's word for word account, neither accepted nor rejected the Israeli request for further and deeper nuclear cooperation. He certainly did not terminate the ongoing French nuclear aid to Israel. Ben Gurion for his part, the account states, openly lied by saying that Israel would always and only utilise Dimona and the plutonium-separating facility “for scientific purposes”.

Second Thoughts – The French Special Side Dish

The verbatim report of the de Gaulle-Ben Gurion summit makes it clear that nothing was decided at this long and secret-agenda meeting. On both sides, facesaving played a key role. De Gaulle neither accepted nor rejected the Israeli demand for more and faster French nuclear construction work. Ben Gurion openly lied, but in a diplomatic way, after stridently saying how much Israel needed the bomb, by claiming the French-built nuclear installations would always and only be used for scientific work and producing electricity. 

De Gaulle was under political pressure inside France, on the secret aid to Israel. Very soon after his Ben Gurion meeting, he received the then-minister for Nuclear Affairs (Affaires atomiques), Pierre Guillaumat who proposed what French call “couper la poire en deux”, some for us, and some for them. If France pulled out of its secret nuclear aid to Israel, Guillaumat noted, it would be held to pay several billion French Francs in non-performance of its contract for the works. But if France continued with the works, Israel would produce the bomb. Thus he suggested to de Gaulle that France must immediately operate political damage-limiting measures, namely to stop the works at the plutonium-separating facility but continue with the Dimona reactor works.

In that way, France could claim it had not been fooled by Israel, and also had taken steps to slow or prevent Israel from building atomic weapons. To Israel, it could claim it had not abrogated the terms of their secret contract.

By 12 January 1961 de Gaulle swung around to this position, and announced it as his own, in a special restricted-member National Council meeting at the French parliament. Somewhat incredibly, this formal and disclosed French position was coordinated with the bizarre public declarations of Shimon Peres, then-director of the Israeli national military program for atomic weapons development, made at the same time. Peres said that French-Israeli nuclear cooperation was now being extended and intensified “for seawater desalination and the development of the Negev desert”, as well as for scientific research and electricity generating.

Fifty-two years later, in Jerusalem, President Shimon Peres of Israel received President Francois Hollande for a warm and friendly “meeting of minds” on the gravity of the Iran nuclear threat!

The Nuclear Cat Out of the Bag

Probably of slender interest for a journalist with slender knowledge of nuclear science and technology like Vinocour, and certainly of no interest to a politician like Francois Hollande, the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters have fully proven, if proof is needed, that large-sized civil nuclear power plants are Doomsday Machines. To be sure, average journalists and politicians are only interested in nuclear devices which go “bang”, calling them devastating weapons, but the economic damage from each of these two civil nuclear disasters is measured in the hundreds of billions of dollars.

The world's civil reactor fleet of about 440 operating reactors produces around 36 tons of plutonium, every year. Puny military-use heavy water reactors able to produce a few kilograms of plutonium per year, the amount needed for one Hiroshima-sized bomb, are in the Boy Scout's department for damage-potential.

Producing nuclear weapons is not necessary if your enemy possesses nuclear reactors. You use missiles, aerial bombing, drone attack, ground-based attack by kamikaze if needed, to take out and destroy your enemy. They will suffer maximum-credible economic damage. As the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters have also proven, it is not even necessary to declare a war, to produce devastating nuclear damage! Nuclear hubris or technological arrogance – a French specialty – is all that is needed to produce nuclear catastrophe.

To date, the Fukushima disaster is estimated by several experts as having releasing more nuclear contamination than from all weapons testing by the UN Security Council 5 declared nuclear powers throughout the 1960s.

By Andrew McKillop

Contact: xtran9@gmail.com

Former chief policy analyst, Division A Policy, DG XVII Energy, European Commission. Andrew McKillop Biographic Highlights

Co-author 'The Doomsday Machine', Palgrave Macmillan USA, 2012

Andrew McKillop has more than 30 years experience in the energy, economic and finance domains. Trained at London UK’s University College, he has had specially long experience of energy policy, project administration and the development and financing of alternate energy. This included his role of in-house Expert on Policy and Programming at the DG XVII-Energy of the European Commission, Director of Information of the OAPEC technology transfer subsidiary, AREC and researcher for UN agencies including the ILO.

© 2013 Copyright Andrew McKillop - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisor.

Andrew McKillop Archive

© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in