Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Friday Stock Market CRASH Following Israel Attack on Iranian Nuclear Facilities - 19th Apr 24
All Measures to Combat Global Warming Are Smoke and Mirrors! - 18th Apr 24
Cisco Then vs. Nvidia Now - 18th Apr 24
Is the Biden Administration Trying To Destroy the Dollar? - 18th Apr 24
S&P Stock Market Trend Forecast to Dec 2024 - 16th Apr 24
No Deposit Bonuses: Boost Your Finances - 16th Apr 24
Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - 8th Apr 24
Gold Is Rallying Again, But Silver Could Get REALLY Interesting - 8th Apr 24
Media Elite Belittle Inflation Struggles of Ordinary Americans - 8th Apr 24
Profit from the Roaring AI 2020's Tech Stocks Economic Boom - 8th Apr 24
Stock Market Election Year Five Nights at Freddy's - 7th Apr 24
It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- 7th Apr 24
AI Revolution and NVDA: Why Tough Going May Be Ahead - 7th Apr 24
Hidden cost of US homeownership just saw its biggest spike in 5 years - 7th Apr 24
What Happens To Gold Price If The Fed Doesn’t Cut Rates? - 7th Apr 24
The Fed is becoming increasingly divided on interest rates - 7th Apr 24
The Evils of Paper Money Have no End - 7th Apr 24
Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - 3rd Apr 24
Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend - 2nd Apr 24
Dow Stock Market Annual Percent Change Analysis 2024 - 2nd Apr 24
Bitcoin S&P Pattern - 31st Mar 24
S&P Stock Market Correlating Seasonal Swings - 31st Mar 24
S&P SEASONAL ANALYSIS - 31st Mar 24
Here's a Dirty Little Secret: Federal Reserve Monetary Policy Is Still Loose - 31st Mar 24
Tandem Chairman Paul Pester on Fintech, AI, and the Future of Banking in the UK - 31st Mar 24
Stock Market Volatility (VIX) - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Investor Sentiment - 25th Mar 24
The Federal Reserve Didn't Do Anything But It Had Plenty to Say - 25th Mar 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Sure Fire Sign that Gas Prices are Heading Higher

Commodities / Gas - Petrol Apr 13, 2008 - 08:41 AM GMT

By: Keith_Fitz-Gerald

Commodities

The U.S. Energy Department said earlier this week that it expects average monthly gasoline prices to peak at $3.60 a gallon this spring, since the high prices will serve to curb demand.

For investors who are tired of feeling like they've been mugged every time they fill up at the corner gas station, this forecast had to nurture a feeling of relief - as well as a belief that pump prices will finally start to decline.


That may well happen in the short term (although even the Energy Department report said that before prices level off there could be interim price spikes that will take pump prices up over the $4 a gallon level).

But for the long haul, after looking at this prediction, we can't think of a more powerful indicator - or surefire sign - that prices at the gas pump are headed higher … much higher.

Here's why.

First and foremost, governments have had an unbelievable record of making bad decisions using bad data. And that record goes back centuries. Unfortunately, it's the taxpayer who usually ends up dealing with the consequences of these ill-advised government "predictions" after these civil-servant prognostications lead to such maladies as inflationary spirals, taxation cycles, recessions, monetary-policy miscues.

Why should this time be any different?

History suggests it won't be.

When it Doesn't Compute

Economic forecasters - especially those employed by the government - have a spectacular history of getting little, if anything, right. Not only that, but according to a study conducted by Societe Generale (OTC: SCGLY ), financial analysts lag reality badly and change their minds only when there is irrefutable proof they are wrong.

William A. Sherdan, author of the book, " The Fortune Sellers: The Big Business of Buying and Selling Predictions ," notes that "economic forecasters have routinely failed to foresee turning points in the economy, the coming of major recessions and the starts of recoveries."

As if that weren't bad enough, University of Chicago Professor Victor Zarnowitz - a leading global expert on business cycles and forecast evaluation - specifically analyzed the U.S. Federal Reserve, the President's Council on Economic Advisors and the Congressional Budget Office to assess the error rates associated with their predictions. His work found that 46 of 48 predictions made by this bunch missed major economic turning points including - most notably, the severe recession beginning in 1974.

Don't expect their marksmanship to get better anytime soon, either. Data we're familiar with suggests that conventional governmental forecasting is actually getting worse over time - not better.

Which makes us all the more suspicious of the $3.60 per gallon price point, particularly since it flies in the face of nearly everything we here at Money Morning know about global gasoline demand - which is accelerating dramatically even as long-term supplies are slowly being squeezed.

We'd love to say that's a surprise, but there's evidence of more government meddling here, too.

A Streetcar Named … Greed

Today, few investors remember the Great American Streetcar Scandal , but it helped set the fuel pinch we're feeling today in motion decades ago. In case you're not familiar with it, the scandal was a joint effort between General Motors Corp. ( GM ), Firestone Tire , Standard Oil Corp. and Phillips Petroleum ( COP ) to acquire streetcar systems nationwide … after which this anti-streetcar syndicate ripped out the municipal trolley systems in order to force the mass adoption of the automobile. This all took place between 1936 and 1950.

Long story short, GM was fined a whopping $5,000 and its executives charged $1 each for conspiracy, but the damage was done. Throw in the Interstate Highway System - which came into existence at about the same time, not coincidentally - and one can easily imagine the links between higher demand and bad decision making, even if only in retrospect.

Which brings us back to the present day…

Gasoline prices are indirectly tied to oil and, as such, the $3.60 line the government drew in the sand stands directly in the face of everything we know about " peak oil " and global demand.

Originally proposed by Shell Oil geophysicist M. King Hubbert in the 1950s, the concept of peak oil refers to the point in time when the maximum rate of petroleum production is reached, after which this production rate endures an irreversible decline.

Originally, it was a highly controversial theory. But in an era where we're burning reserves four times faster than they're being replaced by new discoveries, it's increasingly being accepted as a reality. The sharper experts are no longer asking "if" we're going to run out of oil; now they're trying to predict "when."

It's certainly a vexing question, and we don't pretend to know the answer.

But we do know this: It's likely to be sooner than the world thinks, if for no other reason than global demand is accelerating at a record pace at a time when worldwide inventories are generally declining.

That's why investors can expect more days like Wednesday, when the disclosure that U.S. oil inventories were "lower than expected" torpedoed U.S. stock prices and sent oil futures soaring to a new intraday record of $112.21 a barrel.

The latest Energy Information Administration data suggests that world wide consumption will increase 37% by 2030, which puts demand at staggering 118 million barrels a day. For some perspective: Daily oil consumption in 2006 was 86 million barrels.

Not surprisingly, the lion's share of new demand is coming from the developing world, with China and India leading the way. China, which imports 55% of its oil, is on track to double consumption within 10 years, while India is expected to triple its oil usage in the same period to more than 5 million barrels a day.

Where this gets really interesting is that any number of factors that would reduce supply don't appear to be included in any of the generally accepted equations. For instance:

  • The growth rates in both China and India alone are fast enough and the countries large enough that they could potentially negate any savings we see in this country from higher prices.
  • Oil-exporting countries are becoming increasingly likely to "hold back" oil from the international export markets, opting to keep it at home literally to fuel domestic growth.
  • Several major oil suppliers - most notably Saudi Arabia - may not be accurately reporting their reserve capacity.

Which brings us full circle.

Why I Believe Oil Will Reach $187 a Barrel

I've been projecting energy prices for well over a decade. And I've always made sure to include all the potential catalysts in my forecasts. That's why my projections have been on the mark.

Back in early 2002, when oil was trading at less than $20 a barrel, I conservatively predicted that oil prices would reach $100 a barrel within 10 years. As we now know, it happened in a shorter period than that.

Where do we go from here?

Late last year, when oil was trading in the range of $90 a barrel, I first publicly predicted that crude would trade as high as $187 a barrel in the next three years . In the middle of March, just days after I reiterated that prediction and provided some potential related investment opportunities in an edition of Money Morning , Wall Street giant Goldman Sachs Group Inc. ( GS ) issued a report predicting crude oil prices would reach $175 in the next few years.

Real pricing changes and the altered behavior that flows out of such stressful stretches can only take place when prices are high and when shortages become apparent. Without the benefit of all the information uncovered by such a volatile environment, forecasting can be a fool's game.

As I've demonstrated, whenever I've made price projections, I've always made sure to factor in as many variables as possible. But it's clear to me that the Energy Department did not do the same.

Therefore, as much as we'd love to believe that gasoline prices will stop their incredible ascent at $3.60 a gallon this spring, we can't. Not only does the government's price point seem to be little more than another guess in a long line of baseless predictions, it's even contradicted by the saga that's unfolding on the global economic stage.

Absent the introduction of proven alternatives to gasoline, we're entering an era in which a pump price of $3.60 a gallon is going to be looked back on as a bargain.

And while it's going to be a painful period, investors who view this as an opportunity may well find ways to take the sting out of escalating energy prices. Check out these Money Morning investment research reports:

News and Related Story Links:

By Keith Fitz-Gerald
Investment Director
Money Morning/The Money Map Report

©2008 Monument Street Publishing. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), of content from this website, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Monument Street Publishing. 105 West Monument Street, Baltimore MD 21201, Email: customerservice@moneymorning.com

Disclaimer: Nothing published by Money Morning should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication, or 72 hours after the mailing of printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended by Money Morning should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Keith Fitz-Gerald Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in