Most Popular

EU Super State Wants the Power to Sack Journalists to Control the News

Politics / Propaganda Jan 31, 2013 - 02:02 PM GMT

By: Mike_Shedlock

"Big Brother" in Action

In case you have not already realized it, 1984 has come and gone politically. All that remains is how fast we march down the path of "thought suppression". Here are a couple of articles that will make my point.

The Telegraph reports EU wants power to sack journalists

A European Union report has urged tight press regulation and demanded that Brussels officials are given control of national media supervisors with new powers to enforce fines or the sacking of journalists.

The "high level" recommendations that will be used to draft future EU legislation also attack David Cameron for failing to automatically implement proposals by the Lord Justice Leveson inquiry for a state regulation of British press.

A "high level" EU panel, that includes Latvia's former president and a former German justice minister, was ordered by Neelie Kroes, European Commission vice-president, last year to report on "media freedom and pluralism". It has concluded that it is time to introduce new rules to rein in the press.

"All EU countries should have independent media councils," the report concluded.

"Media councils should have real enforcement powers, such as the imposition of fines, orders for printed or broadcast apologies, or removal of journalistic status."

"The national media councils should follow a set of European-wide standards and be monitored by the Commission to ensure that they comply with European values," the report said.

Nigel Farage, the leader of Ukip, compared the proposals to "Orwell's 1984". "This is a flagrant attack on press freedom. To hear that unelected bureaucrats in Brussels want the power to fine and suspend journalists is just outrageous," he said.

Reflections on "European Values" and a UK Referendum

Financial transactions taxes and agricultural crop subsidies are bad enough. This proposal for "thought police" should scare everyone.

What the hell are "European values"?

Even if there was such a thing, it is absurd and scary to cram them down everyone's throat. If ever there was any justification for Cameron to tell the EU to "go to hell" this is surely it.

Conservatives in UK need to demand an in-or-out referendum now.

Prime Minister Rajoy Threatens Newspapers Following Corruption Article

Want to report on government corruption? Better think twice. "Big Brother" is always watching out (for himself).

Please consider the saga of bribes paybacks and corruption in Spain where the former treasurer of the People's Party, Luis Bárcenas, had amassed up to €22 million ($30 million) from dubious sources, and hid them in Switzerland. Regardless of how Bárcenas got the money, he handed party officials envelopes filled with banknotes worth between €5,000 and 15,000 every month.

Rajoy, opposition leader and head of the PP at the time of transgressions, protected Bárcenas. Now Rajoy wants the disclosures to stop.

How Powerful People React in Tight Spots

Der Spiegel reports Envelopes of Cash: Corruption Charges Put Madrid on Defensive.

The powerful reacted the way powerful people react when they are in a tight spot. Former Prime Minister José María Aznar instructed his attorneys to sue the newspaper El País.

Current Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy, a conservative like Aznar, threatened to sue anyone who leveled accusations at his People's Party (PP).

Bárcenas denies all accusations. And if he is sent to prison, he has threatened that an "atom bomb" will explode.

Reflections on the "Atom Bomb" Threat

It's rather curious how Bárcenas can deny all accusations while simultaneously threatening to set off a political "atom bomb". If everyone is innocent, then it is logically impossible for there to be a political bomb to explode.

In an attempt to sweep this under the rug, Prime minister Rajoy is now threatening newspapers or anyone else throwing charges against the PP.

However, the more they try and sweep under the rug, the bigger and faster the rug needs to grow.

Nineteen Eighty-Four

If you have not yet read Nineteen Eighty-Four, please do so because you are living it. Here is a synopsis from Wikipedia.

Nineteen Eighty-Four is a novel by George Orwell published in 1949. It is a dystopian and satirical novel set in Oceania, where society is tyrannized by The Party and its totalitarian ideology. The Oceanian province of Airstrip One is a world of perpetual war, omnipresent government surveillance, and public mind control, dictated by a political system euphemistically named English Socialism (Ingsoc) under the control of a privileged Inner Party elite that persecutes all individualism and independent thinking as thoughtcrimes. Their tyranny is headed by Big Brother, the quasi-divine Party leader who enjoys an intense cult of personality, but who may not even exist. Big Brother and the Party justify their rule in the name of a supposed greater good. The protagonist of the novel, Winston Smith, is a member of the Outer Party who works for the Ministry of Truth (Minitrue), which is responsible for propaganda and historical revisionism. His job is to re-write past newspaper articles so that the historical record always supports the current party line. Smith is a diligent and skillful worker, but he secretly hates the Party and dreams of rebellion against Big Brother.

As literary political fiction and as dystopian science-fiction, Nineteen Eighty-Four is a classic novel in content, plot, and style. Many of its terms and concepts, such as Big Brother, doublethink, thoughtcrime, Newspeak, and memory hole, have entered everyday use since its publication in 1949. Moreover, Nineteen Eighty-Four popularised the adjective Orwellian, which describes official deception, secret surveillance, and manipulation of the past by a totalitarian or authoritarian state. In 2005 the novel was chosen by TIME magazine as one of the 100 best English-language novels from 1923 to 2005. It was awarded a place on both lists of Modern Library 100 Best Novels, reaching number 13 on the editor's list, and 6 on the reader's list. In 2003, the novel was listed at number 8 on the BBC's survey The Big Read.

By Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List

Mike Shedlock / Mish is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management . Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction.

Visit Sitka Pacific's Account Management Page to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.

I do weekly podcasts every Thursday on HoweStreet and a brief 7 minute segment on Saturday on CKNW AM 980 in Vancouver.

When not writing about stocks or the economy I spends a great deal of time on photography and in the garden. I have over 80 magazine and book cover credits. Some of my Wisconsin and gardening images can be seen at MichaelShedlock.com .

© 2013 Mike Shedlock, All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Mike Shedlock Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.

Comments

Fitzroy 01 Feb 13, 21:43

Press Censorship perhaps Mike Shedlock, a resident of Wisconsin it seems, would like to restrain his spurious comments about press freedom, just because the EC wants to ensure that the govt of this country actually does something after the Leveson enquiry has found the self-regulation of the UK press entirely toothless. A fact that most residents of the UK with any knowledge or interest in the subject have been perfectly well aware of for decades. And for him to start quoting The Telegraph and UKIP as informed comment rather than merely reactionary nonsense and mutter things about Orwell is just plain preposterous. What pray, does he know about the state of, for the most part, our dire British press and it's subservience to the politics of greed, hate, envy and war? Of course any regulation of the press or broadcast media is a double-edged sword. But currently the only journalists who get fired or publicly vilified in this country are the ones who attempt to tell the truth about our warmongers, fat cats and financial thieves. Some kind of press regulation with teeth should be welcomed. It is abusable, of course. But it is unlikely to be anything like as awful as the abuse meted out by our press on innocent and defenceless people day in day out. But of course Mike is probably still of the opinion that any regulation, and especially financial regulation, is the devil's work. Conveniently ignoring the almost inescapable fact that if deregulation had not begun from the 1980's onwards, the construction of the criminally fraudulent derivatives that led to the 2008 crash would never have been allowed. Be that as it may. As far as the freedom of the media is concerned, I suggest Mike devotes himself more to worrying about how Murdoch's media empire is subverting his own political system rather than trying to protect his UK media empire's ability to subvert ours. But perhaps Mike imagines that he still lives in a free country with a free press and not an evermore constricted national security state? If so, he should wake up. In any event, let him spend more time pontificating about things other than his concerns for a free European press. Or maybe just spending more time in his garden... Fitzroy