Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Market Decline Will Lead To Pension Collapse, USD Devaluation, And NWO - Raymond_Matison
2.Uber’s Nightmare Has Just Started - Stephen_McBride
3.Stock Market Crash Black Swan Event Set Up Sept 12th? - Brad_Gudgeon
4.GDow Stock Market Trend Forecast Update - Nadeem_Walayat
5.Gold Significant Correction Has Started - Clive_Maund
6.British Pound GBP vs Brexit Chaos Timeline - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Cameco Crash, Uranium Sector Won’t Catch a break - Richard_Mills
8.Recession 2020 Forecast : The New Risks & New Profits Of A Grand Experiment - Dan_Amerman
9.Gold When Global Insanity Prevails - Michael Ballanger
10.UK General Election Forecast 2019 - Betting Market Odds - Nadeem_Walayat
Last 7 days
What Fake UK Unemployment Statistics Predict for General Election Result 2019 - 6th Dec 19
What UK CPI, RPI and REAL INFLATION Predict for General Election Result 2019 - 5th Dec 19
Supply Crunch Coming as Silver Miners Scale Back - 5th Dec 19
Gold Will Not Surpass Its 1980 Peak - 5th Dec 19
UK House Prices Most Accurate Predictor of UK General Elections - 2019 - 5th Dec 19
7 Year Cycles Can Be Powerful And Gold Just Started One - 5th Dec 19
Lib Dems Winning Election Leaflets War Against Labour - Sheffield Hallam 2019 - 5th Dec 19
Do you like to venture out? Test yourself and see what we propose for you - 5th Dec 19
Great Ways To Make Money Over Time - 5th Dec 19
Calculating Your Personal Cost If Stock, Bond and House Prices Return To Average - 4th Dec 19
Will Labour Government Plant More Tree's than Council's Like Sheffield Fell? - 4th Dec 19
What the UK Economy GDP Growth Rate Predicts for General Election 2019 - 4th Dec 19
Gold, Silver and Stock Market Big Picture: Seat Belts Tightened - 4th Dec 19
Online Presence: What You Need to Know About What Others Know About You - 4th Dec 19
New Company Tip: How To Turn Prospects into Customers with CRM Tech - 4th Dec 19
About To Relive The 2007 US Housing Market Real Estate Crash Again? - 3rd Dec 19
How Far Will Gold Reach Before the Upcoming Reversal? - 3rd Dec 19
Is The Current Stock Market Rally A True Valuation Rally or Euphoria? - 3rd Dec 19
Why Shale Oil Not Viable at $45WTI Anymore, OPEC Can Dictate Price Again - 3rd Dec 19
Lib Dem Election Dodgy Leaflets - Sheffield Hallam Battle General Election 2019 - 3rd Dec 19
Land Rover Discovery Sport Brake Pads Uneven Wear Dash Warning Message at 2mm Mark - 3rd Dec 19
The Rise and Evolution of Bitcoin - 3rd Dec 19
Virtual games and sport, which has one related to the other - 3rd Dec 19
The Narrative About Gold is Changing Again - 2nd Dec 19
Stock Market Liquidity & Volume Diminish – What Next? - 2nd Dec 19
A Complete Guide To Finding The Best CFD Broker - 2nd Dec 19
See You On The Dark Side Of The Moon - 2nd Dec 19
Will Lib Dems Win Sheffield Hallam From Labour? General Election 2019 - 2nd Dec 19
Stock Market Where Are We?  - 1st Dec 19
Will Labour's Insane Manifesto Spending Plans Bankrupt Britain? - 1st Dec 19
Labour vs Tory Manifesto Debt Fuelled Voter Bribes Impact on UK General Election - 30th Nov 19
Growing Inequality Unrest Threatens Mining Industry - 30th Nov 19
Conspiracy Theories Are Killing This Nation - 30th Nov 19
How to Clip a Budgies / Parakeets Wings, Cut / Trim Bird's Flight Feathers - 30th Nov 19
Hidden Failure of SIFI Banks - 29th Nov 19
Use the “Ferrari Pattern” to Predictably Make 431% with IPOs - 29th Nov 19
Tax-Loss Selling Drives Down Gold and Silver Junior Stock Prices - 29th Nov 19
We Are on the Brink of the Second Great Depression - 29th Nov 19
How to Spot REAL Amazon Black Friday Bargains and Avoid FAKE Sales - 29th Nov 19
Central Banks’ Gold Buying and Repatriation Spree - 28th Nov 19
Another Precious Metals’ Reversal Coming Right Up! - 28th Nov 19
Stock Market 100% Measured Moves May Signal A Top - 28th Nov 19
Don’t Look for Investing Advice in the Media - 28th Nov 19
Why You Should Buy Trailer Park Stocks - 28th Nov 19
Will YouGov General Election Forecast 2019 be as Wrong as their REAL Forecast was for 2017? - 28th Nov 19

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

UK House prices predicting general election result

Is Monetary Policy Destroying Our Manufacturing Base?

Economics / Money Supply Feb 06, 2008 - 12:30 AM GMT

By: Gerard_Jackson

Economics In both America and Australia the fear that the manufacturing base is shrinking to the detriment of the economy seems to garner more by the week. Australia's Labor Government has expressed the opinion that the fall in manufacturing as a proportion of GDP is of deep concern. Our so-called free market commentators mock this view, arguing that it is a historical trend that merely indicates that consumer demand has largely moved from manufacturing to services, and this is only to expected as an economy grows richer. In defence of this viewpoint they invoke the law of diminishing marginal utility. This law states that demand for a good will fall as more of it is produced. Hence the shift to services.


Unfortunately they have greatly misunderstood this law. It only applies to homogeneous goods. It is a gross error to apply it to a group of heterogeneous goods. Moreover, if they were right then one would expect the demand for foreign manufactures to also fall. In fact, the US and Australia find themselves 'flooded' with imports. At this point our deep thinking free marketeers resort to the law of comparative advantage which explains why a country imports goods even though it is more efficient in producing them. Now this is a perfectly valid law. However, what is overlooked is that it was formulated within the framework of the gold standard. As Schumpeter put it:

In the first place, the 'classical' writers, without neglecting other cases, reasoned primarily in terms of an unfettered international gold standard. There were several reasons for this but one of them merits our attention in particular. An unfettered international gold standard will keep (normally) foreign exchange rates within specie points and impose and 'automatic' link between national price levels and interest rates. (Emphasis added). (Joseph Schumpeter, The History of Economic Analysis , Oxford University Press, 1994, p. 732).

The reasoning should now become clear: A severe monetary disequilibrium can dislocates exchange rates can badly distort the international patter of trade and production. This fact was debated at length and considerable detail during the "bullion controversy that was triggered in 1801 by Walter Boyd's Open Letter to Pitt. ( A Letter to the Right Honourable William Pitt on the Influence of the Stoppage of Issues in Specie at the Bank of England, on the Prices of Provisions, and other Commodities , 2nd edition, T. Gillet, London, 1801, p. iii).

Henry Thornton played a prominent part in the controversy, and in doing so made significant contributions to monetary theory. England had suspended gold payments in 1797, allowing banks to print their own notes which led to inflation and a disordered balance of trade. This is made clear by the following quote from Thornton:

I t is obvious, that, in proportion as goods are rendered dear in Great Britain, the foreigner becomes unwilling to buy them, the commodities of other countries which come into competition with our's obtaining a preference in the foreign market; and, therefore, that in consequence of a diminution of orders from abroad, our exports will be diminished. . . . But not only will our exports lessen in the case supposed; our imports also will increase: for the high British price of goods will tempt foreign commodities to come in nearly in the same degree in which it will discourage British articles from going out. (Henry Thornton, An Enquiry into the Nature and Effects of the Paper Credit of Great Britain , (1802), London: George Allen and Unwin, 1939, p. 198).

The importance of Thornton's analysis for the balance of trade was indirectly emphasised by David Ricardo when he wrote:

A new tax too may destroy the comparative advantage which a country before possessed in the manufacture of a particular commodity; or the effects of war may so raise the freight and insurance on its conveyance, that it can no longer enter into competition with the home manufacture of the country to which it was before exported. (David Ricardo, Principles of Political Economy and Taxation , Penguin Books, 1971, p. 269).

What these classical economists were saying is that prices matter and that inflationary and tax policies can do considerable damage to exports and therefore domestic manufacturing. However, today's economic commentariat see things very differently. For instance, they grossly misinterpret the great imports of manufactures as being deflationary . But as Wicksell pointed out:

A more important factor is the rise in the supply of imports, and the fall in the demand for exports, which is brought about by a rise in domestic prices, for this in itself exerts a downward pressure on prices. (Knut Wicksell , Interest and Prices , Sentry Press New York, 1936, p. 79. [First published in 1898]).

Wicksell clearly understood that far from being deflationary ' or anti-inflationary ' a great flow imports that exceed exports is due to the central bank's inflationary monetary policy acting through interest rates. Whichever way we turn we therefore find ourselves facing the central bank's monetary policy and its effect on the structure of prices. Mises made an observation that no economist would dispute:

. . . the volume of foreign trade is completely dependent upon prices; that neither exportation nor importation can occur if there are no differences in prices to make trade profitable. (Ludwig von Mises, The Theory of Money and Credit , The Foundation for Economic Education Inc., 1971, p. 250).

Therefore, whatever affects prices affects trade. If the government had a policy of putting a 10 per cent tax on exports while giving importers a 10 per cent subsidy we would have no hesitation in calling it insane. A currency that is overvalued by 10 per cent has exactly the same consequences. It raises export prices by 10 per cent while lowering import prices by the same amount.

It follows that a currency that has been overvalued for sometime might find that its industrial structure has not only become more domestic oriented but that part of it has been shifted abroad in response to the differences in international prices cause by the dislocated exchange rate.

Yet our economic commentariat deny the legitimacy of the above line of reasoning and its genesis. Des Moore - who seems to have become the economic spokesman for our rightwing - condemns this line of thinking as being outside the "traditional explanation". But as we have seen, our economic commentators are the ones who have deviated from the "traditional explanation". It is they who refuse to follow the economic logic that comes from studying the effects of monetary policy on exchange rates and the structure of prices.

By Gerard Jackson
BrookesNews.Com

Gerard Jackson is Brookes' economics editor.

Copyright © 2008 Gerard Jackson

Gerard Jackson Archive

© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Comments

Sile McGrath
07 Feb 08, 14:07
Manufacting base equals power

I agree with you. Have you read Kevin Phillip's "American Theocracy:The Peril and Politics of Radical Religion, Oil, and Borrowed Money in the 21stCentury"? He does a bang up job on the history of the economic rise of the Dutch, Spanish, the British and then Amerian rise to power all based on a MANUFACTURING base. Each lost their power when they exchanged the creation of goods for a financial sector.

Looks like its China's turn again. He also gets into other factors unique to America...the christian conservatives and how they've helped to push us over the edge.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules