Wanted! Bearish Gold Bulls
Commodities / Gold and Silver 2012 Mar 16, 2012 - 01:17 PM GMTBy: Adrian_Ash
Gold's bull run is  exhausted, apparently. Yet it's due only a shower, not a bath...
  
SO GOLD BULLS are turning bearish. But not really.
"A number of things which would have kept people with an eye on the upside  for gold prices have now been  neutralized," says RBS's Nick Moore, who cut the state-owned UK bank's  2012 targets for precious metals other  than gold in January.
Like the rest of Bloomberg's regular gold-forecaster respondents, Moore says "Everything's beginning to look as if it's turning the corner...We've passed the point of maximum despair."
And without despair, gold must be set to fall hard, no? No indeed. "Gold can now settle back," reckons Moore, plumping its pillows for an afternoon snooze.
"The  one danger" for gold prices, says British  MEP Nigel Farage – who used to trade base metals, and so is less clueless than  your average politico – "is that the bullish consensus on gold is now  higher than it's been at any time for the last two or three decades." But  while that consensus means "the short-term speculative market [might find]  itself a bit long of gold," Farage  tells King World News,  the worst that might happen to gold is "that it could have a dip." Do  fetch a towel, would you?
  
  At Mineweb, the same story: "Is gold now the contrarian play?" asks  Geoff Candy,  answering his own question just by raising it, and finding only "fairly optimistic"  calls from even those analysts warning that gold could lose its mojo short  term. Doom-n-gloom heavy Dylan Grice at Societe Generale agrees, writing this  week how "Gold just isn't the misunderstood, widely shunned asset it was a few  years ago," but again finding only good cause to stay long from here,  rather than taking the contrary path. And "10 years ago gold was not owned  by retail investors but was primarily held by central banks," nods the  UK's Armstrong  Investment.
"Strong  performance, uncorrelated returns with other asset classes and the advent of  easily-accessible ETFs have seen investors make ever-increasing allocations to  the precious metal." Yet once more, "An allocation to gold [still]  makes sense in a diversified portfolio."
  
  So far, so what. But hold on – "Investors should not view [gold] as a safe  haven without its own inherent risks," Armstrong go on – about as bearish  a view as you'll find amongst long-term gold bulls today. Anyone wanting a real  sell-off in gold, most especially those who then expect it – revived and  refreshed – to resume the bull market, might have to settle for this.
  
  "Over the long term," says Armstrong, "gold has been a perfect  portfolio diversifier – positive returns with no correlation to traditional  asset classes. [But] over the past three years gold prices have shown a  correlation of +0.8 with the S&P500."
  
  What does that mean? If gold and US equities were joined at the hip, they'd show  a positive correlation of 1.00. And if they moved in opposite directions – but  by precisely the same proportion each time – they'd show a perfectly negative  correlation of 1.00 instead. Whereas over the long-term, the average  correlation between gold prices and stocks actually  comes out at zero. Making gold, as Armstrong notes of the past, the perfect  foil for investors wanting to improve the risk-return profile of their position  in stocks.
So today's current 3-year figure, therefore, up near gold's strongest-ever link with the stock market, does suggest gold has dropped nearly all of its diversification powers. But only if you neglect how that magic comes about in the first place. Not by sitting bang on zero forever, but by swinging now higher, now lower, and averaging out at "non-correlated" by in fact being positive or negative at any one time.

Overall, since gold prices began to move freely amid the last pretence of a Gold Standard in the late 1960s, the metal has moved in the same direction as stocks – on a quarterly basis – for roundabout half of the time. It's gone in the other directon to stocks for pretty much the other half of the time, making gold uncorrelated in total.
Neither positive nor negative, gold in the long run is just unconnected. Which suggests that, whatever next comes for the stock market, trying to time a gold sale (or purchase) based on today's correlation is unlikely to pay.
Chalk another fake bear up as only bullish long term.
By Adrian Ash 
  BullionVault.com 
Gold price chart, no delay | Buy gold online at live prices
Formerly City correspondent for The Daily Reckoning in London and a regular contributor to MoneyWeek magazine, Adrian Ash is the editor of Gold News and head of research at www.BullionVault.com , giving you direct access to investment gold, vaulted in Zurich , on $3 spreads and 0.8% dealing fees.
(c) BullionVault 2012
Please Note: This article is to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it.
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.
	

  