Occupy Wall Street “What’s Your Agenda?"
Politics / US Politics Oct 30, 2011 - 12:20 PM GMTBy: Danny_Schechter
 One of the most frequently repeated, recycled and dismissive questions  about Occupy Wall Street is its supposed lack of an “agenda.”
One of the most frequently repeated, recycled and dismissive questions  about Occupy Wall Street is its supposed lack of an “agenda.”
The “what do you people want” question has featured in media interviews almost to the exclusion of all others.

It’s as if the movement won’t be taken seriously by some, unless and until, it enunciates list of “demands” and defines itself in a way that can allow others, especially a cynical media, to label and pigeonhole it.
Many are just frothing at the mouth for some political positions they can expose as shallow or absurd. Teams of pundits are being primed to go on the attack once they have some bullet points to refute.
(Many police departments don’t need bullet points to go on the attack. They have been having a field day arresting occupiers in many cities, while collecting overtime and readying their own bullets as needed.)
Some on Wall Street already denounce these adversaries as “unsophisticated” for their formulation of the 99% versus the 1%. You’d expect the 1 % to reject this way of seeing the world.
On the right, there is no factual inaccuracy or bizarre incident they won’t invoke to dismiss a movement they lack the mental tools to understand.
The Drudge Report was delighted to expose an incident involving public  masturbation in one city. A group of gun nuts blasted away a group of people  who in their majority are deeply disappointed with President Obama’s non-leadership  on economic issues. 
  They write: “Don't be mistaken. The Wall Street  protestors aren't peaceful hippies congregating about greed or social  inequality. They are uniting to destroy America and everything we stand for.  Their model is the "Arab Spring" which discharged their Governments  in favor of anti-Israel agitators and Muslim fundamentalists. …They are NOT  about freedom, but about World domination and total control. And Obama is  supporting them..........fully.”
  Hmm.
  Others  like Reverend Jesse Jackson want more engagement with legislative issues and  even the backing of candidates. Democratic Candidates, even progressive ones  like Elizabeth Warren, seem ambivalent about backing the occupations. Most are  taking their cue from President Obama who only say he understands their  “frustrations.”)
  Some on the left, including friends of  mine, seem to suffer from undisguised vanguardism and want the Movement to  raise the red flag right away, despite all the anarchists, libertarians and  Democrats among them. Here’s Bill Bowles writing from London:
  “Although many on the established Left  are claiming OWS as their own, latching on to the anti-capitalist theme that  figures prominently, at least in some locations, it's clear that the focus of  the OWS 'movement' varies greatly from place to place. Thus where it all  started, in downtown Manhattan, the focus is very much on capitalist  criminals rather than criminal capitalism. But little or no  mention of the dreaded word- socialism, ironically for fear of alienating even  those who occupy, never mind what the rabid corporate/state media does with  that which shall remain nameless.”
  These are old and, in many instances,  predictable debates but what they miss is what’s new and so vital about this  decentralized, mostly leaderless movement that has captured the worlds  imagination. 
  Judging by the media attention it has  received and polls that show large numbers of supportive Americans. it is  touching a global nerve and changing the national, even international  conversation. It seems to be doing a lot that’s right!
  Not only have they survived mass arrests  and continuing harassment, they showed they could brave what Mother Nature  threw their way. They are in the best tradition of the post office which still  projects this creed despite the spectre of cutbacks:”
  "Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of  night stays these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed  rounds"
  Occupy’s  “couriers” have self-appointed rounds in self managed occupations run by work  groups and guided by participation in a daily   General assembly where activists listen to each other and disagree  without being disagreeable.
  They  have raised a war chest of several hundred thousand dollars. They keep their  sites clean with their own sanitation department. In New York, they feed their  own with their own kitchen that also serves homeless people in the  neighborhood. They even have their own “people’s library.”
  In  many ways,  they are creating ways of  cooperative living that they want society to be like. The key to it all is  commitment and engagement on the individual level. This way of fusing  pragmatism and idealism is what makes it so impressive.
  Movements  that function from the top-down are more controlled but not necessarily more  effective.
  At  this point, the Occupy movements is still growing, and still spreading its aura  more than its message. When you think of how many unemployed people there are  and how many others are coping with foreclosures or student debt you can see  its potential for organizing and outreach.
  Already  activists in Oakland where attacks by police from 19 different jurisdictions  has galvanized a mass reaction, are calling for November 2 “general strike.” 
  Are  they well organized enough to pull this off and to shut down a whole city? 
  This  may be a case of overreaching in reaction to a brutal police action. But, bear  in mind that since it occurred, no one is cheering. The City’s Mayor says she  now supports Occupy. The Police are now supposedly  investigating their own conduct, and the  occupiers are back in the plaza they were forced to abandon.
  Thee  police attacks often boomerang with the public siding with citizens, not cops.
  There  is a lot to be optimistic about.
  Slavoj  Zijek writes in In These Times, “The  Western Left has come full circle: After abandoning the so-called ‘class  struggle essentialism’ for the plurality of anti-racist, feminist, gay rights  etc., struggles, ‘capitalism’ is now re-emerging as the name of THE problem.’
  Let’s put the  emphasis on words like “emerging” and “awakening,” Politics is always a  process. Give people time to distinguish their  friends from their enemies. Let’s trust the wisdom of the people.  They seem to “get it” much more than the  media or the pols.
  It is significant  that there has been talk of National Convention in Philadelphia on July 4th  next year.
  Right now, as for a  definitive agenda, action always speaks louder than words.
News Dissector Danny Schechters film and book Disinformation. For more information, Http://www.plunderhecrimeofourtime.com.
News Dissector Danny Schechter has made a film and written a book on the “Crime Of Our Time.” (News Dissector.com/plunder.) Comments to dissector@mediachannel.org
© 2011 Copyright Danny Schechter - All Rights Reserved 
    Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.
	

 
  
 
	