U.S. Debt Limit Debate Sign of Deeper Economic Dysfunction
Economics / US Debt Jul 28, 2011 - 03:43 AM GMTBy: The_Gold_Report
ShadowStats Editor John Williams advises  legislators to stop fooling around with the country's credit rating. Regardless  of the deal reached, he predicts that the Treasury and Fed will continue to  print money to meet obligations and add liquidity to the economy. In this  exclusive interview with The Gold Report, he explains how that will have  the effect of pushing the price of gold and other commodities even higher. 
The Gold  Report: Unless  Congress approves and President Obama signs an increase in the $14.29 trillion  debt ceiling, the U.S. Treasury is set to begin defaulting on payments starting  August 2. That threat launched months of competing big deals to cut spending  and/or raise taxes. To add to the pressure, in mid-July the credit rating  agencies Moody's and Standard & Poor's threatened to downgrade the U.S.  credit rating from its historic AAA status if the debt limit isn't raised in  time to avoid defaulting on interest and bond payments. That could raise  interest rates for the government and trickle down to consumer mortgage loan  and credit card payments. John, what kind of deal would be good enough to  satisfy bond rating agencies and avoid a double-dip recession? 
  
  John Williams: First of all, the chances are nil that the government  actually will default. There is some talk that if the debt ceiling were not  raised by the August 2 deadline, the government could avoid default for a while  by playing games with its payments—pay interest and debt first instead of  paying other obligations. That could trigger a rating downgrade, if one had not  occurred otherwise. Also, I don't think global investors would view non-payment  of general obligations as a plus and could engage in dumping the dollar. I  think Congress will agree, however, to something by the deadline. I have no  expectation, though, that the deal will be of any substance; nothing that has  been proposed would improve U.S. fiscal conditions meaningfully. 
  
  A country's credit rating is a measure of the risk of debt default. The U.S.  dollar, as the world's reserve currency, is considered the benchmark instrument  for an AAA rating. That generally is considered the riskless category. It would  be very unusual for rating agencies to downgrade a benchmark. Yet the credit  rating agencies now are seeing risk of a U.S. default and are talking a  possible downgrade of U.S. Treasuries. A downgrade would have about as much  negative impact as an actual default. You don't want to see a downgrade. You  don't want to see a default. Those actions would have all sorts of implications,  very negative implications for the financial markets, particularly for the U.S.  dollar. You would see heavy U.S. dollar selling and dumping of U.S.  dollar-denominated assets such as Treasury bonds. You would see a spike in  dollar-denominated commodity prices such as oil. Gold prices would rally  sharply, as would silver, as traditional hedges against inflation. 
  
  TGR: Is printing more money really what the government is going to do to  pay its debt?
  
  JW: That is what countries that spend beyond their means usually do if  they can't raise adequate tax revenues. I can tell you that the current  government cannot raise enough taxes to bring the actual deficit under control.  It could tax 100% of income, take 100% of income and corporate profits, and it  would still be in deficit. In terms of generally-accepted accounting principles  (GAAP) that include annual increases in the unfunded liabilities on a net  present value basis, the U.S. is long-term bankrupt. A true balanced budget  approach would require excessive overhaul—I'm talking massive cuts in the  social programs because cutting every penny of government spending except for  Social Security and Medicare would still leave the country in deficit. We are  spending well beyond the bounds of reason in a number of areas. The country  just does not have the ability to pay for all the services it provides.
  
  TGR: In a July 14 commentary, you said that, "In the event of an  actual default or downgrade, the United States position as the elephant in the  bathtub of sovereign risk likely would cause the dollar to plummet against all  major currencies irrespective of any ongoing concerns related to Euro-area  debt." What would this mean for the U.S. dollar and the price of gold  going forward?
  
  JW: Already stocks are down because the markets are frustrated with the  lack of a deal. The U.S. is such a large player in the world markets that if  the dollar is downgraded, the impact will be felt globally. The dollar should  sink against most major currencies, including the euro, and gold prices would  experience a big bump up. It should be very positive for gold long term. It  doesn't mean that Central Banks aren't going to intervene and that the Treasury  or IMF are not going to try to keep gold prices down. But, over the long haul,  you'll see much higher gold prices. 
  
  TGR: What would default or downgrading mean for the dollar? 
  
  JW: If the U.S. defaults or gets downgraded, that likely will end the  U.S. dollar as the global reserve currency. That's not a viable option for the  United States. People involved with getting the country to that point should be  removed from office. If you are the most financially powerful country on earth,  you don't fool around with your creditworthiness. 
  
  TGR: So, if the dollar isn't the benchmark, would it be the euro? Would  it be the yen? Would it go back to a gold standard? What would happen?
  
  JW: It would probably revert to some kind of a basket of currencies,  probably including gold. The dollar would tend to suffer against the new  benchmark and gold would tend to increase relative to the dollar in such a  circumstance. But I can't tell you exactly what would happen. 
  
  TGR: The new European Union plan for reducing the debt burden for  Greece, Ireland and Portugal offers longer-term and low-interest loans and  allows some bonds to go into temporary default. Does that set a precedent? Will  it contain Europe's debt crisis? 
  
  JW: The euro never should have been put in place. Anyone who ever  thought that the Germans and the Italians could coordinate fiscal policy didn't  know the Germans and the Italians very well. The euro would have been disbanded  or at least realigned by now if we weren't in the middle of a systemic solvency  crisis. The European Union will do anything to keep Greece afloat, as long as  it is viewed as a threat to systemic solvency. Once the system stabilizes, I'd  expect to see a breakup of the euro. 
  
  TGR: In our conversation with you last January, you talked about the difference between  the true deficit and the cash-based deficit published by the government. What  is the true deficit and what can be done to deal with that?
  
  JW: The GAAP-based deficit is running around $5 trillion a year right  now. That includes the numbers popularly looked at in the press and the  year-to-year change in the unfunded liabilities for Social Security and  Medicare adjusted for the present value of money. 
  
  To bring the true deficit into balance, there is nothing that can be done short  of slashing Social Security and Medicare programs, and I see that as a  political impossibility. Again, I mention the entitlement programs here,  because you could eliminate every penny of government spending except for  Social Security and Medicare, and the government still would be in deficit.
  
  TGR: One of the other things that we've discussed with you before is  quantitative easing (QE). Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke said  there will be no more quantitative easing. In your July 8 commentary, you said  the Fed will likely find the markets and banking system pressuring it into some  form of QE3. What form might that take? And, how might that impact the dollar  and precious metals?
  
  JW: Well, Mr. Bernanke hemmed and hawed about the status of QE3 at his  Congressional testimony earlier this month. The economy is weak enough; he will  use that as an excuse. I can't tell you exactly what the Fed is going to do. I  imagine it will go back to buying Treasuries, once the debt ceiling is raised.  That will cause weakness in the dollar and strength in gold. Generally,  anything the Fed does to debase the dollar, which it continues to do on an  ongoing and very deliberate basis, means higher gold. 
  
  TGR: So, what is your prediction for the final solution?
  
  JW: In terms of the debt ceiling, the solution is going to be to  continue raising the debt ceiling. Either that or eliminate the debt ceiling. I  don’t know what can be done politically on either side there. But, the  government is committed to certain obligations. It doesn't make sense that it  wouldn't follow through and borrow the funds to pay what it has already  committed to spend. As to bringing the U.S. fiscal circumstance under control  at present, there simply is no political will by the president or by the  aggregate sitting Congress to do so. 
  
  TGR: Isn't it strange that instead of having this debate when they were  voting about the budget and whether to spend the money, they are talking about  it when it is time to pay the bill for the spending decisions already approved? 
  
  JW: No, we're just dealing with a group of individuals in Washington who  are politicians first, second and last. Most of them have very little real  interest in the nation's fiscal condition. They are looking at getting  reelected and serving their special interests wherever they can. That has been  evident to anyone who has watched the system in recent decades. There are some  new, good people in Congress, but not enough to change things, yet. As Congress  stands right now, there is no chance whatsoever of putting the U.S. fiscal house  in order. 
  
  TGR: You look at a lot of numbers. We have really only talked about the  debt limit. Anything else that you would like to leave us with that could  impact the price of gold?
  
  JW: Well, I think you have covered them. You are going to see ongoing weakness  in the economy. The government is going to respond with more stimulus before  the 2012 election, despite the so-called efforts at reducing the deficit. The  Fed is going to ease liquidity more. All those actions to address the economic  problems will tend to be inflationary, and that is generally positive for gold. 
  
  TGR: Thank you John.
  
  Walter J. "John" Williams was born in 1949. He received an AB in economics, ***** laude, from Dartmouth  College in 1971, and was awarded a MBA from Dartmouth's Amos Tuck School of  Business Administration in 1972, where he was named an Edward Tuck Scholar.  During his career as a consulting economist, John has worked with individuals  as well as Fortune 500 companies. For 30 years he has been a private consulting  economist and a specialist in government economic reporting. His analysis and  commentary have been featured widely in the popular media both in the U.S. and  globally. Mr. Williams provides insight and analysis on his website, www.shadowstats.com.
  
Want to read more exclusive Gold Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you'll  learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews  with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Exclusive Interviews page. 
Streetwise - The Gold Report is Copyright © 2011 by Streetwise Reports LLC. All rights are reserved. Streetwise Reports LLC hereby grants an unrestricted license to use or disseminate this copyrighted material (i) only in whole (and always including this disclaimer), but (ii) never in part.
The Gold Report does not render general or specific investment advice and does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any industry or company mentioned in this report.
From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise.
Streetwise Reports LLC does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported.
Streetwise Reports LLC receives a fee from companies that are listed on the home page in the In This Issue section. Their sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.
Participating companies provide the logos used in The Gold Report. These logos are trademarks and are the property of the individual companies.
101 Second St., Suite 110
  Petaluma, CA 94952
Tel.: (707) 282-5593
  Fax: (707) 282-5592 
  Email: jmallin@streetwisereports.com 
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.
	

  