Proof Media in Hopeless Moral Hazard When Forbes Compares BP With Goldman

Companies / Oil Companies Jun 01, 2010 - 02:20 AM GMT

Best Financial Markets Analysis Article When a major mainstream media like Forbes compares BP with Goldman Sachs and recommends investors to buy Goldman stocks, you know the world is in total moral hazard and deserved to be doomed as Marc Faber has always been saying.

Since Forbes is a financial publication, I will refute based on the investment thesis first. Granted both stocks are high risk plays right now, but I'd venture to say compared to Goldman, BP is obviously oversold and a victim of media hype and Whitehouse populist approach.

This conclusion is based on BP dividend yield (currently close to 7%), a strong average annual compound rate of return of 17.9% since 1977 vs. 10.7% from S&P, the growth prospect of crude oil and low forward P/E ratio of 5.64.

The in-depth Chart of Day story of BP on May 6 by Bloomberg (Chart below) should more than confirm my conclusion about BP stocks from a technical point of view.

Throughout its history, Goldman has been shortchanging retail investors by abusing its market position, which by the way, is put in place partly by the taxpayers' money. Sure, there were a few "official investigations" throughout the years, but basically went nowhere most likely due to the Vampire Squid's deep pocket, massive legal team, and far reaching influential tentacles into many related government agencies.

Now, the SEC finally brought a civil suit holding Goldman responsible for misstating and omitting key facts about a financial product tied to subprime mortgages as the U.S. housing market was beginning to falter. I will not go into the detail here of how Goldman knowingly contribute to the subprime crisis, which is the closet point of origin of the financial crisis leading to the current "Great Recession" and the current 9.5% jobless rate.

This is not to excuse BP for the Gulf oil spill mess. The environmental and economic impact has yet to be fully assessed. But one thing people seem to have chosen to ignore is that BP has paid and will be paying for a long time to come for this mistake ($930 million to date). But where is Goldman on this??

Almost 1,300 vessels are now involved in the response effort. Other oil companies are also helping BP in the Gulf including the world's top supermajor--ExxonMobile--by providing personnel and vessels. The entire oil industry will bear the brunt of the public outrage and is already working together to improve safety and engineering process and procedure to prevent any future similar incidents.

In contrast, posturing aside, Goldman is yet to even formally acknowledge any misdeed. The entire financial industry, instead of looking into self reform, is fighting tooth and nail with Washington on the proposed financial reform. Many are talking about setting up offshore shops to avoid the regulatory "burden".

Meanwhile, the swift regulatory backlash is coming down on the oil industry hard as we speak to "reform" the drilling safety standard, while a meaningful financial reform act is yet to materialize in our life time.

So excuse me for being more than outraged when Forbes dares to compare BP with Goldman, and the biased-agenda-motivated moral hazard the mainstream media have been brain-washing upon the public.

By Static Chaos

http://static-chaos.blogspot.com

© 2010 Copyright Static Chaos- All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

The Market Oracle is a FREE Financial Markets Forecasting & Analysis web-site.
(c) 2005-2024 MarketOracle.co.uk (Market Oracle Ltd) - Market Oracle Ltd asserts copyright on all articles authored by our editorial team and all comments posted. Any and all information provided within the web-site, is for general information purposes only and Market Oracle Ltd do not warrant the accuracy, timeliness or suitability of any information provided on this site. nor is or shall be deemed to constitute, financial or any other advice or recommendation by us. and are also not meant to be investment advice or solicitation or recommendation to establish market positions. We do not give investment advice and our comments are an expression of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to enter into a market position either stock, option, futures contract, bonds, commodity or any other financial instrument at any time. We recommend that independent professional advice is obtained before you make any investment or trading decisions. By using this site you agree to this sites Terms of Use. From time to time we promote or endorse certain products / services that we believe are worthy of your time and attention. In return for that endorsement and only in the cases where you purchase directly though us may we be compensated by the producers of those products.