Gold Tit for Tat, Stocks Are Still A Lousy Investment
Stock-Markets / Stocks Bear Market Oct 07, 2009 - 01:16 AM GMTBy: Adam_Brochert
 NOTE: This is a sort of tit-for-tat rebuttal of a classic hatchet piece on Gold   as an investment class that recently appeared in the Wall Street Journal (see   the article here). All plagiarism is intentional to show the ridiculousness   of such articles and if you haven't read the original article, this rant may not   make a whole lot of sense.
NOTE: This is a sort of tit-for-tat rebuttal of a classic hatchet piece on Gold   as an investment class that recently appeared in the Wall Street Journal (see   the article here). All plagiarism is intentional to show the ridiculousness   of such articles and if you haven't read the original article, this rant may not   make a whole lot of sense.
  
Stocks, like other Wall Street offerings, are a notoriously volatile and fickle investment. They have enjoyed periods of very high interest from investors, followed by long bouts of absolute indifference. Today, stocks are having an intermediate-term period of the former, shining brightly in an otherwise tumultuous investment environment.
The question for investors: Will stocks remain bright or not? More long term, what role should stocks play in an investor's portfolio? The answer to both questions might disappoint the growing stockbug horde.
Stocks had a terrific run in the 1990s. Since 1995, the price of the S&P 500 has essentially doubled -- something few other assets can claim. But the recent short-term surge in stock prices masks some underlying realities. Stocks long-term track record isn't great and financial assets have a penchant for huge, long swings that can burn investors. That's a reason to be cautious about the stock market's current clarion call.
Peak in the Early 2000s
 During the mid 1990s, not long after the U.S. went off any   semblance of a set of accounting standards to back their financial offerings,   stocks skyrocketed, eventually reaching about 1555 for the S&P 500 in   2000.
  
  The thinking at the time seemed straightforward. An unrelenting   internet boom, untameable financial asset inflation and soaring speculation in   the financial markets would place huge pressure on the dollar, Gold and other   international currencies (you aren't one of those people who think Gold is a   commodity, are you?), making stocks one of the few investments that would hold   its value.
  
  The arguments had some merit. Wall Street had just invaded   Washington, Gold prices were racing toward $250 an ounce and the financial   market inflation days of the late-1980s were fresh in the mind.
  
  But what   happened? Stock prices plunged.
  
  Stocks skidded from 1550 for the S&P   500 in 2000 and could only double top in 2007 despite massive currency   depreciation practiced by Washington and their non-federal, private, for-profit,   federal reserve bank. Stocks probably won't see the 2000 or 2007 highs again for   two or three decades -- and on inflation-adjusted terms stocks since 1999 are   down 80% relative to Gold, the non-debaseable true money of a free marketplace.   Stock investing is now a fool's game, a land of dead and lost money. Instead of   the world unfolding as stockbugs expected, the non-federal, for profit federal   reserve lost control of their Ponzi scheme, Wall Street petered out and the   S&P 500 dropped into the ominous 666 range last spring, a harbinger of   what's to come.
  
  In other words, investing in stocks may sound simple, but   history tells us it's anything but.
  
  What drives stock prices? It's an   alchemist's mixture of fundamentals and fantasy. Stock certificates certainly   have industrial uses as toilet paper and they are a hot item for mandatory   purchases in 401(k) accounts, especially in the United States.
  
  But   fundamentals don't support the soaring stock picture of late. As Carl Disberg, a   no-name chief economist at Low Reality Economics, said: "Investor demand for   damaged financial assets surely is depressed -- along with demand for other Wall   Street materials -- and toilet paper use stock certificate demand has also been   damaged by the global recession because shit don't fly as well as shinola in a   secular stock bear market."
  
  Adding to the fundamental doubts about   stocks' surge is the performance of other financial bubble asset classes.   Houses, commercial real estate and corporate bonds have all declined from highs   reached during the global financial crisis, which is in its early stages.   Lately, however, stocks have simply marched higher with barely a pause, smashing   through 1075 on the S&P 500 in September before a recent   retreat.
  
  That brings us to the fantasy half of the equation, which seems   to be the main driver of stocks today. Stocks are the asset class of choice for   those who think everything will return to business as usual when even your 6   year old knows it cannot. A strong dollar policy that has been very effective to   date. Conservative and productive fiscal and monetary policy. Average Joe   prosperity at a higher level than ever. Some stockbugs talk of stockpiling SUVs,   big screen TVs and McMansions. It can get a little Flip That House.
  
  As   with many fantasies, there's a whiff of possibility to some of these fears. The   dollar may get stronger than ever for many reasons -- declining deficits,   short-term memory loss related to the ongoing financial crisis that is not close   to being over -- and some countries may soon call for a fresh supply of   trillions of U.S. paper Dollars to hoard since they are such a great store of   value.
  
  Don't Expect Civic Obedience
  Civic obedience? Because   of the many battles with protesters around the world lately and people fed-up   with the bullshit that comes from Washington and the mainstream media, the   notion of civic obedience seems increasingly far-fetched.
  
  The interest in   stocks does stem from some fundamental issues, namely accounting fraud and a   scramble for protection from attempts to destroy the Dollar by those sworn to   protect it.
  
  For inflation, investors would be better served investing in   Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS, than stocks. The risk of TIPS   declining dramatically and becoming dead money for decades is high, but stocks   may well do even worse. Moreover, if inflation doesn't surge, TIPS will be an   imperfect store of wealth due to the now essentially unavoidable risk of an   eventual currency debasement, while Gold will offer better protection during   deflation and eliminate counterparty risk if one takes delivery of physical   metal.
  
My apologies in advance to Mr. Dave Kansas, who   I'm sure has his reasons for spreading misinformation about Gold. Perhaps some   day Mr. Kansas will learn about the Dow   to Gold ratio, secular credit contractions, breakdowns in the international   monetary system and what these concepts mean for his readers going forward. 
Visit Adam Brochert’s blog: http://goldversuspaper.blogspot.com/
Adam Brochert
  abrochert@yahoo.com
  http://goldversuspaper.blogspot.com
BIO: Markets and cycles are my new hobby. I've seen the writing on the wall for the U.S. and the global economy and I am seeking financial salvation for myself (and anyone else who cares to listen) while Rome burns around us.
© 2009 Copyright Adam Brochert - All Rights Reserved 
  Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors. 
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.
	

 
  
 
	